General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFuntatlaguy
(10,887 posts)Desert grandma
(804 posts)I donated some $$. We DO need to fight back and whatever works is the thing to do.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)bdamomma
(63,923 posts)I just donated. I'm going to do everything in my power to get these SOB's out.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,869 posts)I can think of better uses of my money - I'm contributing directly to candidates I support.
oldtime dfl_er
(6,931 posts)He's loud, he's on our side, and he has the attention of the media. That's more than can be said for Chuck Schumer or a whole host of others. I would throw money at him just to see him make noise. We NEED that.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,869 posts)about what will be done with the money - how it will be used, to whom it will be distributed, and who decides. Avenatti is a showman and a self-promoter and I don't trust him. My donations won't be going to anybody's PAC but directly to candidates - that way I know it will be used the way I want it to be used.
oldtime dfl_er
(6,931 posts)Your way is as good as any.
We should get big money out of politics altogether, IMHO, although that's a pipe dream at this point.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Ill give the Fight PAC a little and see how it goes. Im intrigued by the idea of fighting to win on our side, instead of holding back so much out of political politeness. Normally I wouldnt support this tactic, but theres just too much at stake.
Ive been an activist union member for decades and know first hand that its when you stop asking politely like Oliver Twist and start using the courts as a means to force your requests be taken seriously you get real results. Avenatti is a pro in this system of getting fair justice. I trust that part of him.
Im also not averse to him running for office. Its our American right to do so. If he fails then best to know it for a fact.
oldtime dfl_er
(6,931 posts)Drumpf has been using the courts and threat of courts all his life to bully and browbeat and intimidate. High time we did the same.
WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)And its under a month out. Seems like this is being set up for the future.
Its rough around here if you say the slightest negative thing about Avenatti. I saw Steins recount as a scam on day one. This one isnt as clear but it seems pretty obvious it will have little impact this time around. I do have a PAC I donate to but I like for my money to go directly to the candidates and the DNC.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)snowybirdie
(5,240 posts)But despite his over the top activism, I can't bring myself to trust him. Now he wants my money? Don't think so.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,869 posts)That way the donation is accounted for and you know it will be used the way you want it to be used. The more I see of Avenatti the less I trust him. I think he's in it for his own ambitions.
pnwmom
(108,996 posts)The PAC gets around donation limits. As long as Citizens v. United is in effect, we shouldn't allow only the R's to benefit.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...on behalf of any candidates for office in 2018.
Not one cent.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211784562
22. Transfers to Affiliated/Other Party Committees 0.00 0.00
23. Contributions to Fed. Candidates/Committees and Other Political Committees 0.00 0.00
24. Independent Expenditures (SCHEDULE E) 0.00 0.00
25. Coordinated Expenditures Made by Party Committees (SCHEDULE F) 0.00 0.00
30. Federal Election Activity
(a) (i) Allocated Federal Election Activity - Federal Share (SCHEDULE H6) 0.00 0.00
(a) (ii) Allocated Federal Election Activity - Levin Share (SCHEDULE H6) 0.00 0.00
(b) Federal Election Activity Paid Entirely with Federal Funds 0.00 0.00
(c) Total Federal Election Activity ( 30(a)(i)+30(a)(ii)+30(b) ) 0.00 0.00
mopinko
(70,239 posts)get some other people elected and we will think about you, michael.
calimary
(81,510 posts)And Im honestly sorry about it. Dreadfully sorry about it. But this is how it has to be. Unfortunately, we cant afford to be nice and fight fair and all those good above-board and admirable things. Not in THIS game. Not in THIS era.
We HAVE to fight dirty. We cant afford to follow rules when the opposition wont. Rules only work and only have meaning when both sides honor those rules and honestly play by those rules. When one side refuses to, then you automatically have a tilted playing field where the rule breakers have the advantage.
So Ive come to believe that WE have to ignore those rules and fight as dirty as we can. Because, sadly enough, thats the name of the game. Not only are rules made to be broken, but following those rules just gets you ROLLED.
Rules get you rolled.
oldtime dfl_er
(6,931 posts)expressed better by you! Thanks
HipChick
(25,485 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,632 posts)and his guests hardly ever support him. I have said it on DU and get nasty replies about "not stooping to their behavior, do we really want to have no morals just to win like they do", etc. We are fighting for our country and this is no exaggeration. I am stubborn and love my country and HATE the GOP!
DemocracyMouse
(2,275 posts)telling women you can't wear a miniskirt and speak with anger.
Has Avenatti ever taken a position in support of the powerful? He defended the weak an adult filmmaker and a woman alleging sexual abuse.
Check your prejudices people. Did Jesus turn away from Mary Magdalen?
I think what rubs some people funny anout Avenatti is a certain street toughness. There's class and sex worker prejudice in the mix here. Avenatti was spoken of in glowing terms by a former professor of his. He was deemed incredibly bright.
We need all hands on deck people. Give Avenatti a break. Do you only want to partner with groomed, prep school smoothies (many with Wall Street support)?
gay texan
(2,477 posts)For a long time, we have needed somebody to show the left how to truly fight the GOP bastards. We ain't going to win it by playing both sides of the aisle. Every time we've tried that we keep getting rolled over
0rganism
(23,971 posts)one of the last things i want to look at when i load a political page is the inside of someone's nose - even Mr. Avenatti's most excellent schnoz
interesting choice - conventional wisdom is you want to avoid bottom-up photographs of people as it reduces sympathy.
oldtime dfl_er
(6,931 posts)I bet he would fix it. I agree with you, it's not a great looking page.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)I think $5,000/individual is the current max cont to a PAC per year.
https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/limits.php
Charlotte Little
(658 posts)He blew it with this last go-around. Ian Masters called him a Trump-clone basically. Same bully bluster not backed by much.
I say it won't end well with this guy constantly inserting himself into the narrative. And I absolutely do not want him running in 2020.
We need experienced adults or this country will just continue to implode.
I've decided to donate to Beto (and make phone calls for him). Better use of my time and money.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)As a default, donations were split 50/50 between Beto and Avenatti
And given Betos campaign does NOT accept money from PACs, arguably all donations would have ended up in Avenattis hands
This guy smells. Badly. Way too many people up here get enamored of anyone boisterous and loud who appears to fight against Trumpers. How many have to Jill Stein when she was going to demand recounts to help Hillary? Stein collected millions and didnt spend it on recounts.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,869 posts)You had to read the fine print and go to a second page in order to reallocate the donation to something other than 50-50. It might have been technically legal but it was deceptive and made me trust Avenatti even less than I did already, which was about as far as I could throw a grand piano. Just shows how easily a flashy loudmouth can fool people if they know all the right things to say. Exhibit A: Donald Trump.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Sleeze comes to mind.