"premature" for House Democrats to be talking about re-investigating or impeaching Kavanaugh

[Snake Plissken]

Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) on Sunday said it's "premature" for House Democrats to be talking about re-investigating or impeaching Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh if they win back control of the chamber.

https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/410290-coons-premature-for-house-dems-to-talk-about-impeaching-kavanaugh

This is exactly why Republicans control all three branches of government and the majority of Americans are left being underrepresented, people like Coons more interested in coddling the minority of Republicans in the country than representing the demands of his own voters, let alone the majority of Americans.

An investigation into Kavanaugh should start within microseconds of Congress being sworn in and it should last until all of eternity if that is what it takes, a pile of shit like Kavanaugh has no business being on the Supreme Court.

[Squinch]

1. Impeachment without conviction is useless. Investigation into Kavanaugh should start within

microseconds of BOTH houses of a Democratic Congress being sworn in, and not before.

We need the House to impeach and the Senate to convict.

If we go when we only control the House, we are spitting into the wind.

[john657]

10. Even if we regain control of the Senate,

conviction and removal isn't a done deal, it still takes 67 Senators voting to convict and remove.

[Me.]

2. If It's A Matter Of Holding Your Fire For The Moment

I'm ok with it

[Hermit-The-Prog]

3. Not much point in investigating at this time

Focus on November.

[Turbineguy]

5. There is no sense

in trying to impeach him as long as repubs control the Senate. What does make sense is to encourage people with credible information to come forward. The GOP wanted this, now they can own it.

[rockfordfile]

7. They have no problem in that.

[MiniMe]

11. Even if the Dems take the Senate back, which will probably not happen

It would be by a narrow margin, and it takes 67 Senate votes to impeach

[Turbineguy]

12. It's better to expose

him for the person he is. And there's another thing. This is John Roberts' Court. He may not like being tied to this guy and having his Court's reputation turned to shit.

[Socal31]

6. The OP's sentiment is honorable.

But impeachment doesn't mean he is removed from the bench. So if removal is the goal, then it is premature to use political capital on it.

[Snake Plissken]

8. I don't want him impeached, I want him wearing an orange jumpsuit and handcuffs as he is sentenced

for perjury

[rockfordfile]

9. This is the same guy that got suckered.