General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAbigail Adams (1744-1818)
"Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands. Remember, all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice, or representation."
Do not forget this women of DU. "Remember the ladies" should be a rallying cry.
BigmanPigman
(51,615 posts)We all know.
murielm99
(30,753 posts)It went right over the heads of many of the boys. The girls got it.
BigmanPigman
(51,615 posts)Volaris
(10,273 posts)Somehow she was a hundred and fifty years smarter than the Enlightened-Age Geniuses who wrote the Constitution.
I think her husband probably married her cause he knew she was smarter he was...
Gothmog
(145,427 posts)murielm99
(30,753 posts)"Remember the ladies."
Cha
(297,442 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,833 posts)Domo Arigatou gozaimashita! ども ありがとう ございました。 ほんと です。
nycbos
(6,035 posts)A letter written by her on March 31, 1776, explained that she doubted most of the Virginians had such "passion for Liberty" as they claimed they did, since they "deprive[d] their fellow Creatures" of freedom.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abigail_Adams#Slavery
brer cat
(24,585 posts)K&R
cachukis
(2,248 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)she became First Lady at the age of 22.
murielm99
(30,753 posts)Thank you.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)She was quite a person. Here's the letter to her husband she wrote that in. She would have been about 32 in 1776.
https://www.masshist.org/digitaladams/archive/doc?id=L17760331aa
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)as much to her. Some things are more the same than otherwise.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)JudyM
(29,251 posts)mountain grammy
(26,638 posts)sheshe2
(83,833 posts)Thank you Muriel.
backtoblue
(11,344 posts)mcar
(42,356 posts)Abigail Adams knew. The time is long overdue for a reckoning.
JHan
(10,173 posts)A truly amazing woman with a keen mind, and smarter than her husband
Thank you for this muriel <3
TallMike
(161 posts)C'mon guys...
show our sisters the love.
watoos
(7,142 posts)it took until 1920 before white men allowed women to vote. I live in the middle of Trumpers in central Pa. and my 85 year old golfing buddy told me that giving women the right to vote was the biggest mistake this country made.
He even added that that day was the one that will go down in infamy. Misogyny and bigotry are alive and well in 2018.
Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)As to your extraordinary Code of Laws, I cannot but laugh. We have been told that our Struggle has loosened the bands of Government every where. That Children and Apprentices were disobedient -- that schools and Colledges were grown turbulent -- that Indians slighted their Guardians and Negroes grew insolent to their Masters.
But your Letter was the first Intimation that another Tribe more numerous and powerfull than all the rest were grown discontented. -- This is rather too coarse a Compliment but you are so saucy, I wont blot it out.
Depend upon it, We know better than to repeal our Masculine systems. Altho they are in full Force, you know they are little more than Theory. We dare not exert our Power in its full Latitude. We are obliged to go fair, and softly, and in Practice you know We are the subjects. We have only the Name of Masters, and rather than give up this, which would compleatly subject Us to the Despotism of the Peticoat, I hope General Washington, and all our brave Heroes would fight. I am sure every good Politician would plot, as long as he would against Despotism, Empire, Monarchy, Aristocracy, Oligarchy, or Ochlocracy. -- A fine Story indeed.
cachukis
(2,248 posts)The repartee of their conversation was dependent on his successful parlaying of words.
She had one of the masters to dance with.
While her independent streak kept the family and its matters going, she knew she had an ear that had been turned countless times to see what others had missed.
He was practical, but leant towards altruism. He knew he was only a subject.
His response is really a recognition of her sentiments, but Peticoat Despotism would be a hard sell.
He was in the game that the gamesters couldn't give up with out losing what false sense of dignity they had.
She relied on his bravado because the world would not recognize hers until too many years later.
His response is a high brow acknowledgement of social issues that have yet to be resolved.
At least there a few women in Congress today.
still_one
(92,303 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)She knew that women weren't mentioned once in the constitution.
"Remember the ladies"!