Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(182,848 posts)
Sat Oct 6, 2018, 04:37 PM Oct 2018

McConnell just explained that this a "project"

“This project ... is the most important thing that the Senate and an administration of like mind — which we ended up having — could do for the country,” McConnell said. “Putting strict constructionists, relatively young, on the courts for lifetime appointments is the best way to have a long-term positive impact on America. And today is a seminal moment in that effort.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/06/kavanaugh-confirmation-mcconnell-877474

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McConnell just explained that this a "project" (Original Post) underpants Oct 2018 OP
. eleny Oct 2018 #1
The old man just admitted that he intentionally created a conservative partisan Baitball Blogger Oct 2018 #2
Of course they did...we know they have been having secret meetings since at least the '80s unitedwethrive Oct 2018 #25
That was his/their plan all along I thing.. mitch96 Oct 2018 #3
Bush v. Gore, Citizens United - strict constructionists, my ass dalton99a Oct 2018 #4
"Strict constructionists" are activist judges. They just make decisions the Repukes agree with. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Oct 2018 #9
Strict constitutionalist TNLib Oct 2018 #29
Expect them to try to replace Clarence Thomas with a younger model next. GoCubsGo Oct 2018 #5
Stack this sucker when we get power. roamer65 Oct 2018 #6
Absolutely. dalton99a Oct 2018 #7
They did everything they could to obstruct. No McConnell breaks every rule he can. underpants Oct 2018 #17
I hope that old fuckwad dies off soon Horse with no Name Oct 2018 #8
He is a disgrace to democracy. JudyM Oct 2018 #10
He is a disgrace to humanity Horse with no Name Oct 2018 #11
Yes. As with Scalia, I will celebrate the day he dies. JudyM Oct 2018 #13
you and I should make a date for that day! My bladder will be full! n/t Horse with no Name Oct 2018 #15
Right there with ya, Horse! JudyM Oct 2018 #16
#YouToo? LovingA2andMI Oct 2018 #33
well we know bdamomma Oct 2018 #37
I'm going to piss on his grave. Ace Rothstein Oct 2018 #14
A nice painful disease or illness for which there is neither cure nor remedy dalton99a Oct 2018 #21
I hate McConnell most of all. -nt CrispyQ Oct 2018 #28
Don't count on it. I'm still waiting for Darth Cheney to kick off. woodsprite Oct 2018 #38
We will be back, Mitch. Enjoy it while you can. IluvPitties Oct 2018 #12
let me put it this way... If Mitch McConnell was dying in a fire and I just drank a six pack of beer Snake Plissken Oct 2018 #18
If I accidentally hit him in a car accident...oh the temptation for "R" gear. roamer65 Oct 2018 #20
The project andym Oct 2018 #19
They also ignored the "blue slip" courtesy on Kavanaugh too underpants Oct 2018 #22
Mitch has ignored the blue slip courtesy leftieNanner Oct 2018 #26
Trump's goal is to have the court expand the scope of his get-out-of-jail-free cards, CrispyQ Oct 2018 #30
essentially, to entrench white male privilege in the judiciary, since the legislative is likely lost anarch Oct 2018 #34
McConnell has spent his life doing nothing positive for the American people Johonny Oct 2018 #23
WHAT A LOAD OF BULLSHIT! In It to Win It Oct 2018 #24
Those are just RW marketing terms YessirAtsaFact Oct 2018 #31
The dems conceded the narrative to the right almost 4 decades ago. CrispyQ Oct 2018 #32
Since there's no mention of "air force" in the Constitution, constructionists will soon defund it ck4829 Oct 2018 #27
we should damn well pay attention to this 0rganism Oct 2018 #35
If and when we get back the White House. The President must increase the size of the Supreme Court. Fla Dem Oct 2018 #36

Baitball Blogger

(46,750 posts)
2. The old man just admitted that he intentionally created a conservative partisan
Sat Oct 6, 2018, 04:40 PM
Oct 2018

Supreme Court.

Let's see, where was Scalia at in his reasoning before he died? Oh, yes, that it was okay to discriminate against people of color.

unitedwethrive

(1,997 posts)
25. Of course they did...we know they have been having secret meetings since at least the '80s
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:07 PM
Oct 2018

with this very goal in mind. All of it, the gerrymandering, the stacking the courts, the voter restrictions, and the outright cheating...all part of their plan since there was no honest way for a small minority of people to gain control of the government given the old rules (so they are making new ones).

mitch96

(13,919 posts)
3. That was his/their plan all along I thing..
Sat Oct 6, 2018, 04:52 PM
Oct 2018

Even to the point of loosing the house and senate, they wanted a conservative court for a long time. Congress swings right and left but the court stays the same for a long time...
Now my question is WHY..... what are those guys cooking up??
m

9. "Strict constructionists" are activist judges. They just make decisions the Repukes agree with.
Sat Oct 6, 2018, 05:10 PM
Oct 2018

"Activist judges" are those who decide in a way contrary to the way the Right Wing wants.

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
5. Expect them to try to replace Clarence Thomas with a younger model next.
Sat Oct 6, 2018, 04:59 PM
Oct 2018

Although, it might be tough to get him to hand over his power.

underpants

(182,848 posts)
17. They did everything they could to obstruct. No McConnell breaks every rule he can.
Sat Oct 6, 2018, 05:33 PM
Oct 2018
Prior to November 21, 2013, in the entire history of the nation there had been only 168 cloture motions filed (or reconsidered) with regard to nominations. Nearly half of them (82) had been during the Obama Administration,[36] but those cloture motions were often filed merely to speed things along, rather than in response to any filibuster.[37] In contrast, there were just 38 cloture motions on nominations during the preceding eight years under President George W. Bush.[38] Most of those cloture votes successfully ended debate, and therefore most of those nominees cleared the hurdle. Obama won Senate confirmation for 30 out of 42 federal appeals court nominations, compared with Bush's 35 out of 52.[38][39]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option

bdamomma

(63,913 posts)
37. well we know
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:47 PM
Oct 2018

he hates women. I think he would be very happy to curtail/end women's voting or am I just overly paranoid.

woodsprite

(11,917 posts)
38. Don't count on it. I'm still waiting for Darth Cheney to kick off.
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 02:37 PM
Oct 2018

Maybe these guys drink the blood of the young whose futures they screw over.

Snake Plissken

(4,103 posts)
18. let me put it this way... If Mitch McConnell was dying in a fire and I just drank a six pack of beer
Sat Oct 6, 2018, 05:37 PM
Oct 2018

I would piss my pants before I pissed on him to put out the fire.

andym

(5,445 posts)
19. The project
Sat Oct 6, 2018, 05:45 PM
Oct 2018

Block Obama's lower court appointments
Annoy Reid into using the nuclear option to remove 60-vote threshold for lower courts (mistake by Reid?)
Stonewall Merrick Garland for almost a year.
With Trump in hand, use nuclear option to remove 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court Justices (using Reid as excuse)
Appoint Gorsuch with 54 votes
Get Kennedy to retire.
Appoint Kavanaugh with 50 (51 potential votes).

The goal: overturn Roe V Wade, civil rights expansions

CrispyQ

(36,487 posts)
30. Trump's goal is to have the court expand the scope of his get-out-of-jail-free cards,
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:14 PM
Oct 2018

so he & his putrid offspring never have to go to jail for the crimes they've committed. If the rest of the GOP agenda is enacted as well, so be it, but Trump is after expanded pardon power.

anarch

(6,535 posts)
34. essentially, to entrench white male privilege in the judiciary, since the legislative is likely lost
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:32 PM
Oct 2018

And (unless term limits are done away with--certainly a possibility, since that wasn't in the original constitution) probably also the executive branch, and demographics are not looking good for the odds of the straight white Christian Male maintaining hegemony amongst the voting population going forward...packing the judicial branch with ideologues of their stripe is their last chance to hold on to real power in the future.

As I've seen pointed out, one of the main attractions of the "constructionist" interpretation is that the Constitution was written by white male landowners, and meant to protect their interests as such, and during a period when slavery was a major factor in their economy. Before any amendments, the document doesn't really explicitly address civil rights. Obviously what it turns into is simply picking the parts of the original document that suit your interests.

Anyway, I think that's "the project." Entrenching white male privilege and perpetuating our current wealth structure, at the bottom of it.

Johonny

(20,864 posts)
23. McConnell has spent his life doing nothing positive for the American people
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 12:32 PM
Oct 2018

he'll die without ever doing anything positive for the American people and he knows it. He gives not a shit for any of us. Never has, never will.

In It to Win It

(8,267 posts)
24. WHAT A LOAD OF BULLSHIT!
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:03 PM
Oct 2018

How exactly did we let them claim these ridiculous loaded terms like "constructionist", "patriot", and "constitutionalist"?

YessirAtsaFact

(2,064 posts)
31. Those are just RW marketing terms
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:14 PM
Oct 2018

They have no bearing on reality.

Maintaining the white male dominance is the real goal, but it’s not a good selling slogan.

CrispyQ

(36,487 posts)
32. The dems conceded the narrative to the right almost 4 decades ago.
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:17 PM
Oct 2018

One pundit put it this way: The dems are good at policy but suck at politics.

ck4829

(35,078 posts)
27. Since there's no mention of "air force" in the Constitution, constructionists will soon defund it
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:10 PM
Oct 2018

Right?

0rganism

(23,960 posts)
35. we should damn well pay attention to this
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:35 PM
Oct 2018

sure would be nice to see some Democratic leaders and strategists emerge from this inferno.

Fla Dem

(23,711 posts)
36. If and when we get back the White House. The President must increase the size of the Supreme Court.
Mon Oct 8, 2018, 01:42 PM
Oct 2018

But we have to also have the House and Senate. The President can request an increase in the number of SC Justices, but that would then have to be approved by Congress.

Article III of the United States Constitution does not specify the number of justices. The Judiciary Act of 1789 called for the appointment of six "judges." ... As the nation's boundaries grew, Congress added justices to correspond with the growing number of judicial circuits: seven in 1807, nine in 1837, and ten in 1863.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»McConnell just explained ...