General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"the "soros-funded protesters" thing should be understood as an anti-semitic dogwhistle"
?
Verified account
@jbouie
13h13 hours ago
More the soros-funded protesters thing should be understood as both an anti-semitic dogwhistle and an attack on the idea of legitimate opposition itself, a tactic imported from european far-right parties
Thank you Jamelle Bouie
MountCleaners
(1,148 posts)A lot of right-wing "populist" rhetoric is.
The people spouting this stuff might not think they are being anti-Semitic, but they walk a path that was created with anti-Semitic hate.
JHan
(10,173 posts)It's become normalized.
DavidDvorkin
(19,480 posts)Of course it's an anti-semitic dogwhistle, and there really is no need to dilute that by interpreting in more general terms.
brewens
(13,608 posts)both right.
kimbutgar
(21,172 posts)JI7
(89,259 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,210 posts)Behind the Aegis
(53,967 posts)It is an effective one, and used way more than most would even imagine.
JHan
(10,173 posts)It was an argument with a progressive too, and we're both on the left. He goes on and on about Goldman Sachs, so I ask him - how come J.P Morgan doesn't get the same level of demonization? Why does the bank with the Jewish name get all the hits? I easily critique consolidation and the current state of financial corruption without mentioning Goldman Sachs, but for some this is impossible and it morphs from Goldman Sachs to Globalist Bankers to "Zionist banks" to "Zionist Capitalist conspiracy", to "Zionist Media Conspiracy" and "Soros funded" conspiracies.
Just yesterday Rudi Guiliani retweeted this:
Link to tweet