Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:17 PM Sep 2018

Rosenstein: The Gist of it

Let me see if I have this right.

So, Trump’s Admin Trolls concocted a story about Rosenstein that was designed to pressure him to resign. They then fed it to a news organization detested by Trump, probably figuring ‘hey, bonus’ if the story was questioned and the NYT was called out for printing ‘fake news.’

The right wing press dutifully amplified the noise from the story in the attempt to up the pressure on Rosenstein to leave.

Rosenstein calmly denied the report.

Trump’s Admin Trolls then made up a follow-up story that Rosenstein succumbed to the pressure and, resigned because he feared being fired (with an inference of feeling guilty about actions accused of in NYT story).

Again, Rosenstein calmly denied the report.

Except, Rosenstein is clearly not fearful and quite strong and none of the above actions ascribed to him actually took place, except in the fevered imagination of the Trump Admin Trolls.

Do I have this right?

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rosenstein: The Gist of it (Original Post) suffragette Sep 2018 OP
I have no idea what the hell is going on but that's as good an explanation as any. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2018 #1
When you have people who detest governance running the government, you get a big mess. suffragette Sep 2018 #18
Yes. That sounds pretty accurate. nt GoCubsGo Sep 2018 #2
Trump is acting like a cornered criminal C_U_L8R Sep 2018 #3
Well! malaise Sep 2018 #6
I wonder what will happen NewJeffCT Sep 2018 #12
Yes. Grasping at anything to save his criminal ass. suffragette Sep 2018 #21
"designed to pressure him to resign"? not sure how anything was meant to do that. unblock Sep 2018 #4
By twisting a sarcastic comment supposedly made by Rosenstein about taping Trump into an action he suffragette Sep 2018 #10
but a gotcha of what? so what if he was seriously talking about wearing a wire to talk to donnie? unblock Sep 2018 #14
I agree completely with you. That's why the whole thing has an imaginary vibe, because it was suffragette Sep 2018 #22
Now someone explain to me in simple terms TlalocW Sep 2018 #5
Rosenstein is Mueller's boss; a right-wing successor could shut down Mueller. lagomorph777 Sep 2018 #15
he's the only person who can really fire mueller and/or stop the investigation. unblock Sep 2018 #16
Unfortunately, bluescribbler Sep 2018 #25
it's certainly hard to see it, but the ugly truth is that unblock Sep 2018 #26
There is also the strange and actually innocent coincidence that Sessions was scheduled to Fred Sanders Sep 2018 #7
Spot on. Nevilledog Sep 2018 #13
I didn't know that. Very interesting. suffragette Sep 2018 #17
OK, have to admit it is on the Fox website, but since that does not help the narrative for them Fred Sanders Sep 2018 #19
Bingo! happy feet Sep 2018 #8
Baby out with bath water? Fred Sanders Sep 2018 #20
I wonder that also. And could this be a way to get subscribers to leave that FAILING NYT? erronis Sep 2018 #27
MSM can't resist... GeorgeGist Sep 2018 #9
and media is now acting like Rosenstein mcar Sep 2018 #11
Don't know exactly what happened, but the scenario in the OP sounds plausible. n/t Different Drummer Sep 2018 #23
You forgot the NYT anonymous OpEd just days before jmbar2 Sep 2018 #24
The New York Times should have known better. D23MIURG23 Sep 2018 #28

NewJeffCT

(56,829 posts)
12. I wonder what will happen
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:43 PM
Sep 2018

when we get Roger Stone indicted, followed by Don Jr and/or Jared Kushner? And, then one of them flips on Don Sr?

unblock

(52,329 posts)
4. "designed to pressure him to resign"? not sure how anything was meant to do that.
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:27 PM
Sep 2018

i think they might have thought it could provide cover for firing him.
i think they might have thought it could pressure senators to vote for kavanaugh by reminding them they need a stooge on the court.

but i'm not sure how they would think that it would pressure rosenstein into resigning.
well, they're idiots, so who knows.
but... target of investigation doesn't like the investigator... so what? how is that supposed to make him resign?

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
10. By twisting a sarcastic comment supposedly made by Rosenstein about taping Trump into an action he
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:42 PM
Sep 2018

was proposing.

They thought it was a gotcha moment. And yes, cover for firing him, or if believed, to put pressure on him to resign. They may have even thought the stories in the news about Omarosa taping Trump and others possibly doing the same might give more credibility to this. But it wasn’t believable at all and like so much else from this crew, they fumbled the whole thing.

unblock

(52,329 posts)
14. but a gotcha of what? so what if he was seriously talking about wearing a wire to talk to donnie?
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:47 PM
Sep 2018

a prosecutor wearing a wire isn't something surprising or anything they should think to quit over.

exposing that he may have been thinking about wearing a wire to record *someone who is under investigation* isn't anything a prosecutor should think to quit over.





i think it's only a "gotcha" moment for the people who have an "us vs. them" mentality, it reveals he's not on donnie's side.

for the people who place loyalty to donnie above loyalty to country, this is a big deal. but to the real world, it's not.

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
22. I agree completely with you. That's why the whole thing has an imaginary vibe, because it was
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 03:01 PM
Sep 2018

concocted by those who have an “us vs them” mentality and who are loyal to Trump above all. And they are thinking how they might react rather than how a genuine civil servant might behave.

TlalocW

(15,391 posts)
5. Now someone explain to me in simple terms
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:27 PM
Sep 2018

Why is Rosenstein important? I'm having trouble keeping track of all the players.

TlalocW

unblock

(52,329 posts)
16. he's the only person who can really fire mueller and/or stop the investigation.
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:50 PM
Sep 2018

sessions has recused himself from russia matters, so he can't do it.

donnie can't do it legally, at least not directly, though he can fire attorneys general and deputy attorneys general until he finds one who will shut down the investigation.

that's basically what nixon did in the "saturday night massacre", his last major desperate attempt to stop the watergate investigation shortly before he was forced to resign.


bluescribbler

(2,123 posts)
25. Unfortunately,
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 05:06 PM
Sep 2018

in 1974 there were Republican Senators and Congresscrittrers who actually gave a s
shit about rule of law and the Constitution. I see no evidence that there any now.

unblock

(52,329 posts)
26. it's certainly hard to see it, but the ugly truth is that
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 05:14 PM
Sep 2018

we'd actually be in an even worse mess if there weren't *some* republicans holding him back somehow.

if he thought he could get away with it, he certainly would have fired mueller a long time ago. some republicans somewhere talked him out of that. almost surely they convinced him he would have to get impeached and removed, meaning that more than a dozen republican senators would have to abandon him if he did that.

i know, low bar, and they're keeping it quiet, but it actually could be even worse than it is...

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
7. There is also the strange and actually innocent coincidence that Sessions was scheduled to
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:39 PM
Sep 2018

meet with Kelly today, regular thing, but Rosenstein went because Sessions unavailable, for some reason not yet unearthed.

The world works in mysterious ways and even faster than social media sometimes.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
19. OK, have to admit it is on the Fox website, but since that does not help the narrative for them
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:54 PM
Sep 2018

I think it is accurate without checking any more.

happy feet

(871 posts)
8. Bingo!
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:41 PM
Sep 2018

I just cancelled my NYT digital subscription. They gave me an offer to continue but I said ENOUGH!! Will keep my WaPo subscription.

erronis

(15,341 posts)
27. I wonder that also. And could this be a way to get subscribers to leave that FAILING NYT?
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 06:05 PM
Sep 2018

Just watched Active Measures last night. Wouldn't put anything beyond any of them.

mcar

(42,376 posts)
11. and media is now acting like Rosenstein
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 02:43 PM
Sep 2018

just got a reprieve until his meet with Dotard on Thursday. "Will he hold on to his job?" they breathlessly report.

They won't admit they got played.

jmbar2

(4,907 posts)
24. You forgot the NYT anonymous OpEd just days before
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 04:47 PM
Sep 2018

Wonder if that was just testing the NYT, or pump priming.

D23MIURG23

(2,850 posts)
28. The New York Times should have known better.
Mon Sep 24, 2018, 11:14 PM
Sep 2018

This creates a problem even if it is bullshit. With all the shit this fucking rag has pulled in the last 20 years - Judith Miller, fabricated Iraq war stories, Bill fucking Kristol on the editorial staff - I really think they should change their name to the "Empire State Enquirer". Its a name better suited to a journalistic enterprise of their "caliber".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rosenstein: The Gist of i...