General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe allegations against Brett Kavanaugh are not simply a 'he said, she said' situation
Allegations of sexual assault are deserving of a full and fair investigation, particularly when a lifetime appointment to the nations highest court is at stake.
We now have the specifics of an alleged attack Christine Blasey Ford, a California professor, says occurred in the 1980s when she and Judge Brett Kavanaugh were in high school in Maryland. Speaking to The Washington Post, Ford claims that Kavanaugh physically and sexually assaulted her and provided very specific details about how he allegedly pinned her to a bed, groped her and covered her mouth to prevent her from screaming with such force that she was afraid he might suffocate her.
So now the question is: Whats next? The latest proposal is for Ford and Kavanaugh to testify under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday. However, these allegations are extremely serious and we five former federal prosecutors with a combined experience of many decades believe that a Senate hearing, if it indeed occurs, is not enough. It will not adequately provide the American public with the full facts and truth about these allegations, nor, importantly, will it allow the Senate to fulfill its constitutional role of advice and consent in the context of potential Supreme Court justices. Rather, there must be a thorough, unrushed investigation by the FBI or by another independent investigator and a full and fair public hearing, including all relevant witnesses and not just Kavanaugh and his accuser.
Because, if true, the allegation alone should disqualify Kavanaugh from serving on the Supreme Court.
While some argue that the truth about this incident will come down to a he said, she said situation, thats not how it looks to us. Prosecutors and investigators are confronted with these scenarios frequently and dont just throw up their hands and say, We cant decide. Instead, prosecutors look for corroborating evidence and there are strong indications already that Ford is telling the truth about her attack. Here are some of those indicators:
First, there is corroboration. Fords therapists notes in 2012, provided to The Washington Post, generally record her account of the attack. To believe that this is a made-up tale to prevent Kavanaughs confirmation, Ford would have had to plant the seeds of this story in 2012. That makes no sense.
Second, while not determinative, the fact that Ford passed a polygraph administered by a former FBI agent lends credence to her claims. Polygraph exams are inadmissible in court because they are not always reliable, but the FBI and other law enforcement agencies frequently use polygraph tests to assess the credibility of witnesses and defendants.
In addition, consider the motives of Ford, who by all accounts is not a particularly politically active person, to go public with allegations of sexual assault. It appears that she did not want to speak publicly at all, but that reporters discovered her identity and pursued her. Ford knew that she would be personally attacked in front of her children, colleagues, students and friends. There is no reasonable explanation for why she would subject herself to such humiliation other than the reason she has given: that she felt she had a duty as a citizen to speak up.
-more-
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/allegations-against-brett-kavanaugh-are-not-simply-he-said-she-ncna910771
donkeypoofed
(2,187 posts)A fellow high school girl who was a few years ahead of 15 yr old Christine. And while she did not know the victim personally, even she had heard about it.