Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:44 PM Aug 2012

NYT editorial slams Romney and his embrace of Ryan

Editorial

Mr. Ryan’s Cramped Vision

Mitt Romney’s safe and squishy campaign just took on a much harder edge. A candidate of no details — I’ll cut the budget but no need to explain just how — has named a vice-presidential running mate, Paul Ryan, whose vision is filled with endless columns of minus signs. Voters will now be able to see with painful clarity just what the Republican Party has in store for them.

As House Budget Committee chairman, Mr. Ryan has drawn a blueprint of a government that will be absent when people need it the most...More than three-fifths of the cuts proposed by Mr. Ryan, and eagerly accepted by the Tea Party-driven House, come from programs for low-income Americans. That means billions of dollars lost for job training for the displaced, Pell grants for students and food stamps for the hungry. These cuts are so severe that the nation’s Catholic bishops raised their voices in protest at the shredding of the nation’s moral obligations.

Mr. Ryan’s budget “will hurt hungry children, poor families, vulnerable seniors and workers who cannot find employment,” the bishops wrote in an April letter to the House. “These cuts are unjustified and wrong.”

<...>

Mr. Romney had already praised the Ryan budget as “excellent work,” but until Saturday the deliberate ambiguity of his own plans gave him a little room for distance, an opportunity to sketch out a more humane vision of government’s role. By putting Mr. Ryan’s callousness on his ticket, he may have lost that chance.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/11/opinion/paul-ryans-cramped-vision.html


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT editorial slams Romney and his embrace of Ryan (Original Post) ProSense Aug 2012 OP
Yes, the difference between the NYT and the WSJ couldn't be clearer. Viva_Daddy Aug 2012 #1
K&R BumRushDaShow Aug 2012 #2
These same Catholic bishops will line up to support him in November though. Ruby the Liberal Aug 2012 #3
I'm afraid so Freddie Aug 2012 #5
Biden will eat Ryan for lunch in the debate Marzupialis Aug 2012 #4
Agree. n/t ProSense Aug 2012 #6

Viva_Daddy

(785 posts)
1. Yes, the difference between the NYT and the WSJ couldn't be clearer.
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:04 PM
Aug 2012

Now maybe this Presidential campaign and all the rest of the campaigns will finally focus on the very real differences in ideology and policy between Democrats and Republicans.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
3. These same Catholic bishops will line up to support him in November though.
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:37 PM
Aug 2012

They will outweigh the social contract with their anti-abortion stance. Pro-life, right up to birth, then you're on your own.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT editorial slams Romne...