Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,028 posts)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:28 PM Aug 2012

NYT Sunday Editorial Smacks Romney/Ryan "A Blueprint Of A Government That Will Be Absent"

Mr. Ryan’s Cramped Vision
Editorial
New York Times
August 12, 2012

Mitt Romney’s safe and squishy campaign just took on a much harder edge…

…Voters will now be able to see with painful clarity just what the Republican Party has in store for them.

As House Budget Committee chairman, Mr. Ryan has drawn a blueprint of a government that will be absent when people need it the most. It will not be there when the unemployed need job training, or when a struggling student needs help to get into college. It will not be there when a miner needs more than a hardhat for protection, or when a city is unable to replace a crumbling bridge.

And it will be silent when the elderly cannot keep up with the costs of M.R.I.’s or prescription medicines, or when the poor and uninsured become increasingly sick through lack of preventive care.

More than three-fifths of the cuts proposed by Mr. Ryan, and eagerly accepted by the Tea-Party-driven House, come from programs for low-income Americans. That means billions of dollars lost for job training for the displaced, Pell grants for students and food stamps for the hungry. These cuts are so severe that the nation’s Catholic bishops raised their voices in protest at the shredding of the nation’s moral obligations.

Mr. Ryan’s budget “will hurt hungry children, poor families, vulnerable seniors and workers who cannot find employment,” the bishops wrote in an April letter to the House. “These cuts are unjustified and wrong…”

MORE:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/11/opinion/paul-ryans-cramped-vision.html?_r=1

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT Sunday Editorial Smacks Romney/Ryan "A Blueprint Of A Government That Will Be Absent" (Original Post) kpete Aug 2012 OP
Sad to say - BUT Laf.La.Dem. Aug 2012 #1
The Government will be all too present n2doc Aug 2012 #2
GOP government not doing its job--like Katrina Democrats_win Aug 2012 #3
Great piece. Thanks! nt Mojorabbit Aug 2012 #4

Laf.La.Dem.

(2,946 posts)
1. Sad to say - BUT
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:49 PM
Aug 2012

The RW and Tea Party will say - "this all sounds good to me"!!

If the NY Times does not like this man - he will get my vote!!

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
2. The Government will be all too present
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:13 PM
Aug 2012

When voter suppression is needed to keep the 'right folks' in office.

When companies need muscle to take your money and property away

When religious zealots want to force you to carry a fetus to term, no matter what

Wherever inequality needs a helping hand.

Democrats_win

(6,539 posts)
3. GOP government not doing its job--like Katrina
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:23 PM
Aug 2012

Our government resembles a "hired man" working on a farm. The "hired man" needs to make sure everything is okay at night so that storms won't damage everything. He needs to kill the weeds so that the crops will grow right. He needs to make sure that insects don't damage the crops.

Government has some things that it needs to do so that everything is okay. For example, they should make sure that cities are protected from floods, they should make sure that our financial system isn't crooked and they need to educate our children for a brighter future. The GOP government tries to stop all of this from happening.

The truth about GOP government is that they will use the taxes we pay (and the loans they obtain) to enrich themselves and their cronies rather than taking care of business.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT Sunday Editorial Smac...