Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,013 posts)
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 09:47 AM Sep 2018

NYT Boom: Those secret Kavanaugh emails that the Judiciary Committee won't let out? We've got them:

Boom: Those secret Kavanaugh emails that the Judiciary Committee won't let out? We've got them: Abortion, affirmative action, surveillance. Now the committee has something to talk about.




Leaked Documents From Kavanaugh’s Time in White House Discuss Abortion and Affirmative Action

WASHINGTON — As a White House lawyer in the Bush administration, Judge Brett Kavanaugh challenged the accuracy of deeming the Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision to be “settled law of the land,” according to a secret email obtained by The New York Times.

The email, written in March 2003, is one of thousands of documents that a lawyer for President George W. Bush turned over to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the Supreme Court nominee but deemed “committee confidential,” meaning it could not be made public or discussed by Democrats in questioning him in hearings this week. It was among several an unknown person provided to The New York Times late Wednesday.

Judge Kavanaugh was considering a draft opinion piece that supporters of one of Mr. Bush’s conservative appeals court nominees hoped they could persuade anti-abortion women to submit under their names. It stated that “it is widely accepted by legal scholars across the board that Roe v. Wade and its progeny are the settled law of the land.”

Judge Kavanaugh proposed deleting that line, writing: “I am not sure that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme Court level since Court can always overrule its precedent, and three current Justices on the Court would do so.”

..............









The rest:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/us/politics/kavanaugh-leaked-documents.html#click=https://t.co/lJJm7CADbU


20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT Boom: Those secret Kavanaugh emails that the Judiciary Committee won't let out? We've got them: (Original Post) kpete Sep 2018 OP
BOOM! Good! empedocles Sep 2018 #1
More from NYT: kpete Sep 2018 #2
K&R HipChick Sep 2018 #3
I want to see more recent stuff. Cracklin Charlie Sep 2018 #4
Here you go...from 2013 about presidential powers to stop prosecutions etc. brush Sep 2018 #6
In one email called affirmative action in the DOJ a "naked racial set-aside". Fred Sanders Sep 2018 #12
They aren't really "leakers." watoos Sep 2018 #14
Rachel touched on a good point last night stopwastingmymoney Sep 2018 #20
Great news malaise Sep 2018 #5
authoritarianism & greed will dominate the 'civilized' world until we get some real sex education certainot Sep 2018 #10
Will this change minds on the Republican side? Will the Democrat's vote as a solid block to oppose jalan48 Sep 2018 #7
but he's the most qualified EVER!!! /s/ certainot Sep 2018 #9
When trump said qualified mikeysnot Sep 2018 #16
Yeah, this might just coalesce the Republican vote LiberalLovinLug Sep 2018 #17
Rec'd and kick'd lunatica Sep 2018 #8
r and k... Stuart G Sep 2018 #11
"Failing", eh? nolabear Sep 2018 #13
Call your repuke senators! Auggie Sep 2018 #15
Beautiful! (nt) klook Sep 2018 #18
KICK Hekate Sep 2018 #19

kpete

(72,013 posts)
2. More from NYT:
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 09:50 AM
Sep 2018

Other documents provided to The Times included a document showing that in September 2001, after the terrorist attacks, Judge Kavanaugh engaged with a Justice Department lawyer about questions of warrantless surveillance at the time that lawyer wrote a memo an inspector general report later portrayed as the precursor to the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program.



Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)
4. I want to see more recent stuff.
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 09:55 AM
Sep 2018

Surely Ms. Kamala had something in mind when she asked the nominee if he had had contact with Trumps lawyers. Like a dog on a bone, she was. And he would NOT answer.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
12. In one email called affirmative action in the DOJ a "naked racial set-aside".
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 12:18 PM
Sep 2018

God bless the leakers, the informants, the bloodless coup leaders and of course, the truths they reveal being hidden by evil.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
14. They aren't really "leakers."
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 12:25 PM
Sep 2018

This information should be available and Republicans are hiding it from us.

stopwastingmymoney

(2,042 posts)
20. Rachel touched on a good point last night
Fri Sep 7, 2018, 09:18 AM
Sep 2018

They aren't just hiding it from us, 'committee confidential' they're also trying to hide it from Senators not on the committee

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
10. authoritarianism & greed will dominate the 'civilized' world until we get some real sex education
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 12:02 PM
Sep 2018

thanks to the universally dreaded 'sex on the wrong brain'

jalan48

(13,881 posts)
7. Will this change minds on the Republican side? Will the Democrat's vote as a solid block to oppose
Thu Sep 6, 2018, 11:40 AM
Sep 2018

his nomination?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT Boom: Those secret Ka...