General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo, gloomy gusses, Schumer didn't cave on the judge appointments. Check the NLRB.
He actually got a good deal. Mark Pearce got reappointed to the NLRB in return for not gumming up the works on appointments Schumer ultimately couldn't block anyways.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Nice to see there was more to the deal than benefits on the campaign trail. I imagine we will find out more, as well.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)fallout87
(819 posts)Sure, this may have sped up the release, but still... LIFETIME JUDGES!!
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)I suspect youve been waiting a few years to see what we get for being the reasonable party. So have I.
fallout87
(819 posts)New strategy is needed ASAP. Possibly new leadership in the Senate depending on how the midterms turn out.
fallout87
(819 posts)down which would have slowed down the SC nominee. 14 in one month is something that should have taken the rest of the YEAR!
Response to Recursion (Original post)
octoberlib This message was self-deleted by its author.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)Republicans retain the majority of seats on the five-member partisan panel, which gives the party greater discretion over workplace policy coming from the NLRB. But Pearces renomination is nonetheless a significant and surprising victory for worker advocates and Democrats. The White House made the move despite sharp and near-unanimous criticism of Pearce by Republicans and the business community, and an established practice of leaving seats open in order for an administration to keep their partys majority.
Practically speaking, the renomination will have a substantive impact on Board procedures and decisions if Pearce is confirmed by the U.S. Senate for another term, Jerry Hunter, a former Republican NLRB general counsel, told Bloomberg Law Aug. 29.
https://www.bna.com/trump-renominates-pearce-n73014482088/
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...than what the average citizen sees.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Thanks for posting some common sense in a non-sensical afternoon.
Sid
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Some people here are determined to think the worst of Democrats. Don't confuse them with facts.