General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat about all the Enquirer front page articles against Hilary? Isn't that a campaign
contribution for trump? Was that ever claimed as a contribution? It must have amounted to a huge amount.
pnwmom
(108,994 posts)But they can't coordinate with a candidate, as AMI did when it offered to troll for stories, arrange for payment, kill the stories, and get reimbursed by DT.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)shraby
(21,946 posts)doc03
(35,364 posts)time every morning.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)She will win.
Boomerproud
(7,964 posts)Are the libel laws that toothless? They have her (or BIll) dying every six months.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Enquirer can post whatever the hell it wants.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,364 posts)Citizens United says so.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)if Hillary were to sue them for libel, they couldn't hide behind an absence of malice defense, since clearly, they knew the stories were false.
She could clean their clocks.
But even if Hillary doesn't sue them - and I doubt she will - other victims of their "journalism" would likely have an easier time proving libel given what's come out about the Enquirer patterns and practices.