Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pnwmom

(109,000 posts) Fri Aug 17, 2018, 03:07 PM Aug 2018

Since Judge Ellis has been personally threatened, shouldn't he sequester the jury?

He says he's worried enough that he won't be releasing their names.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Since Judge Ellis has been personally threatened, shouldn't he sequester the jury? (Original Post) pnwmom Aug 2018 OP

Yes Doodley Aug 2018 #1

I hope he never gets to preside over another high profile case. Iliyah Aug 2018 #2

I think I'm gonna 🤤. n/t sprinkleeninow Aug 2018 #4

Yes! Especially now that BLOTUS has shot his big mouth off about... PearliePoo2 Aug 2018 #3

Doodley

(9,142 posts)

1. Yes

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Fri Aug 17, 2018, 03:09 PM

Aug 2018

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)

2. I hope he never gets to preside over another high profile case.

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Fri Aug 17, 2018, 03:12 PM

Aug 2018

sprinkleeninow

(20,267 posts)

4. I think I'm gonna 🤤. n/t

Reply to Iliyah (Reply #2)

Fri Aug 17, 2018, 03:32 PM

Aug 2018

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)

3. Yes! Especially now that BLOTUS has shot his big mouth off about...

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Fri Aug 17, 2018, 03:20 PM

Aug 2018

what a good guy Manafort is and how this is SAD for our country!

There's NO way he should be involved in an active trial and offering opinions. All it takes is one juror and you've got a hung jury.
What are the odds there's at least one Trump-Humper on the jury? They are NOT supposed to listen to any news but still... What the fucking fuck?

Reply to this discussion