General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have a bad feeling about the Manafart trial...
Defense is exuding onfidence, judge is berating prosecution, does not sound like a good picture...
Could become an embarrassment for Mueller, which is what we don't need right now...
(Hope I'm wrong...)
lamp_shade
(14,836 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Their lack of a presentation for defense is a desperate measure I've seen attempted several times but never successfully.
Watch trump. If he loses his mind and does something crazy to distract, you'll know he's feeling the pressure.
PaddyIrishman
(110 posts)When the law is on your side, pound the law
When the facts are on your side, pound the facts
When neither law nor facts are on your side, pound the table.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)GetRidOfThem
(869 posts)...if the jury does convict, it will so much more difficult to appeal...
former9thward
(32,017 posts)Appeals are made on disagreements on the law and court precedent. The jury does not decide those. The jury only decides the facts. Appellate courts do not revisit the facts.
MaryMagdaline
(6,855 posts)Would be tough to beat even half of them.
If one or two jurors decide to hang the jury, they would have their work cut out (so many counts) and the other jurors could be tough to ignore.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)If he gets acquitted on 10 of 18 counts, that still leaves many, many years in jail.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)He blames other people for messing up his taxes. But we all pay tax and we know what it means when you sign your tax form.
former9thward
(32,017 posts)Income tax law is different than many other types of law. To violate the law the prosecution must show the defendant knew what he was doing when the tax forms were submitted. The must show he knew he was violating the law.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Jurors have experience with taxes and accountants. They know their own income, they prepare their own taxes or they know what they told their accountant, so they are starting with the assumption that Manafort should do the same. They are not so experienced with shell corporations and international wire transfers, so other charges may be harder for them to understand.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)He used wire transfers from them to pay for many of his purchases. It's hard to argue that he "just forgot" to check off the Form 1040 box that asks if you have any foreign financial accounts. Manafort's accountants testified they were not told/did not know of his foreign bank accounts. When you sign your federal tax return, you are saying that what's in it is true and accurate. We all have that shared experience.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)He deliberately signed forms that included a check in a box indicating he had NO accounts.
Once might have been an error. But he did this over and over -- on purpose, as part of a pattern.
spooky3
(34,456 posts)and as a loan on day Y, when it would benefit him to do so, suggests strongly that he knew exactly what the implications were of underreporting income on his tax forms.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,719 posts)no matter how shitty you really think the trial went. Lawyers are also actors.
PunksMom
(440 posts)tRump does this on a daily basis.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)If they put Manafort in the witness box, all kinds of things would have come out in open court that are much more valuable to them as leverage.
Rudy has effectively dangled the pardon in recent ramblings, but the Feds have the threat of NY state charges to entice him with a coordinated plea/immunity deal that will keep him from dying in prison.
They are now waiting for the "best & final" offers.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)ADX
(1,622 posts)...Manafort is going to be convicted, period.
manor321
(3,344 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)Isn't DU supposed to be a place where things are discussed?
GetRidOfThem
(869 posts)A lot of things don't go the way they should. And a lot of things don't appear the way they should.
Otherwise Agent Orange would never have been inaugurated. See, he was never going to win...
And the institutions are going to protect us from him...
The same institutions that allowed him and his Cabal to get to power....
kentuck
(111,098 posts)The best he can hope for is a re-trial. It would be a win for him, I suppose, since he will have bought more time.
rainbowsnunicorns
(9 posts)It really doesn't matter what the outcome is. He's going to be pardoned either way.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And Trump cant pardon on state charges. He could spring him for a while and then hell be back for tampering w witnesses again.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)It may not be all we hope for, but he will get convicted of at least some of them.
PatSeg
(47,483 posts)Doesn't look good for Manafort. The worst thing I can imagine is possibly a hung jury.
GetRidOfThem
(869 posts)...I am just get adjusted to the fact that we are living in a topsy-turvy world where anything can happen...
spooky3
(34,456 posts)sense to be cautious. But as I've posted in several places, one source of some comfort that may be helpful for you to remember is that jurors from Alexandria are likely to have AT LEAST bachelor's degrees, and both sides were able to strike a number of prospective jurors that gave clues that they might be biased.
Research in general shows that jurors do work hard to do a good and fair job.
I had jury duty in a neighboring county last spring. I was amazed as one prospective juror after another were asked questions about their occupations, and heard "doctor"; "lawyer"; "investment banker"; "nurse practitioner"; "physical therapist"; "teacher"; etc., etc. These people are going to take these charges very seriously.
And only about 18% of the voters in Alexandria City voted for Trump in 2016. Also 50% of the jurors are female per the WaPo. I don't know about minority membership on the jury.
This is NOT to say that people without degrees aren't also smart and conscientious. Many are. It is just that as a group, they are more likely to support Trump, if they are also white.
PatSeg
(47,483 posts)I'm feeling a little less confident right now. Such an roller coaster ride every day.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)They pretty much only could go after Gates.
And there is SOOOO much evidence corroborating Gate's testimony.
maryellen99
(3,789 posts)People thought he was going to be acquitted of all charges. He wasnt and there were people on the jury who voted for him twice.
riversedge
(70,239 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)jury nullification will occur in this case as some alleged happened in the OJ Simpson trail. The jurors are required to follow the judge's instructions and because jurors take the honor and responsibility of jury duty seriously, I believe they will follow his instructions which is to use the evidence.
Now if the judge, the defense attorneys, the defendant did anything to tamper with the jury then they will be prosecuted.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)of our democracy for tramps and thieves.
Demsrule86
(68,582 posts)GetRidOfThem
(869 posts)One Trumpian juror holdout prevented the conviction on all 18 counts. Geez maneez...