Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservative law professor unloads on White House counsel Don McGahn for drafting Trump's non-disclo (Original Post) Gothmog Aug 2018 OP
Here's the tweet and you can follow the thread: The Velveteen Ocelot Aug 2018 #1
The White House's non-disclosure agreements aren't normal Gothmog Aug 2018 #3
My Dad used them to intimidate ghostsinthemachine Aug 2018 #6
It's no answer to say, "he knew they were unenforceable."The White House Counsel shouldn't in the bu Gothmog Aug 2018 #2
It's quite possibly a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct in D.C. The Velveteen Ocelot Aug 2018 #5
This is why I love DU. underpants Aug 2018 #4
K&R UTUSN Aug 2018 #7

Gothmog

(145,291 posts)
3. The White House's non-disclosure agreements aren't normal
Mon Aug 13, 2018, 07:55 PM
Aug 2018

These agreements are not enforceable http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-white-houses-non-disclosure-agreements-arent-normal

Marcus spoke to attorney Debra Katz, who has represented numerous government whistleblowers and negotiated nondisclosure agreements, who described Trump’s NDAs as “crazy.”

Circling back to our previous coverage, there are a few angles to this to keep in mind.

First, are these NDAs enforceable? The ACLU believes the answer is no. Ben Wizner, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, said in a statement in March, “Public employees can’t be gagged by private agreements. These so-called NDAs are unconstitutional and unenforceable.” Whether anyone at the White House will test this assessment is unclear.

Second, what’s with Team Trump and its contempt for transparency? We’re not just talking about tax returns and visitor logs anymore. The scope of the secrecy surrounding this presidency is stunning.

And third, Marcus concluded with a key question about how Trump oversees his operation: “Why is he so consistently frantic to ensure that no one knows what goes on behind closed doors?” Under the circumstances, it’s hard not to wonder what it is, exactly, that the president is worried about being exposed.

ghostsinthemachine

(3,569 posts)
6. My Dad used them to intimidate
Mon Aug 13, 2018, 09:19 PM
Aug 2018

People. Scare them into thinking they MIGHT be sued. And for the most part, they worked.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,721 posts)
5. It's quite possibly a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct in D.C.
Mon Aug 13, 2018, 08:37 PM
Aug 2018
Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule 4.1--Truthfulness in Statements to Others
In the course of representing a client, a lawyer shall not knowingly:
(a) Make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person; or
(b) Fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited by Rule 1.6.
https://www.dcbar.org/bar-resources/legal-ethics/amended-rules/rule4-intro.cfm
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Conservative law professo...