Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Mon Aug 13, 2018, 03:03 PM Aug 2018

Pierce: The Trump Regime Will Make It Easier for Financial Firms to Gouge U.S. Veterans

Swine, the lot of them.

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a22713386/consumer-financial-protection-bureau-military-lenders/

The Trump Regime Will Make It Easier for Financial Firms to Gouge U.S. Veterans
Mick Mulvaney's CFPB continues to ignore its duty—and Betsy DeVos is getting in on the game, too.
By Charles P. Pierce
Aug 13, 2018


Memo To Reporters: in the future, any reference by the president* to "our wonderful vets" should be translated into "our wonderful campaign props." The Management.


From The New York Times:

Mick Mulvaney, the interim director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, intends to scrap the use of so-called supervisory examinations of lenders, arguing that such proactive oversight is not explicitly laid out in the legislation, the main consumer measure protecting active-duty service members, according to a two-page draft of the change. The agency’s move comes as a Senate committee prepares to vote on the nomination of Kathleen Kraninger to succeed Mr. Mulvaney as chief of the consumer watchdog, which is responsible for protecting consumers from financial abuse. The proposal surprised advocates for military families, who have urged the government to use its powers to crack down harder on unscrupulous lenders. The consumer bureau conducted dozens of investigations into payday and other lenders during the Obama administration without any significant legal opposition, and no lenders are currently challenging its oversight based on the law, according to administration officials.


Yes, it is purely a jurisdictional issue and has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that Mulvaney hoovered up more than $60,000 from the payday loan industry while he was a congresscritter. And I am the Tsar of all the Russias. In addition, Mulvaney's predecessor, Richard Cordray, stands accused, again, of the unpardonable sin of doing his job too well.

The bureau will still bring individual cases against lenders who are found to charge in excess of the annual interest rate cap of 36 percent mandated under the law, and continue to supervise lenders under other statutes. But it will scrap supervisory examinations, which are the most powerful tool for proactively uncovering abuses and patterns of illegal practices by companies suspected of wrongdoing, former consumer bureau enforcement officials said. John Czwartacki, a spokesman for Mr. Mulvaney, said the rule change came from a top-to-bottom review of the bureau’s procedures geared at curtailing what the administration, along with lending industry executives, have criticized as overly aggressive enforcement by the bureau’s first director, Richard Cordray.


You've got to be eight kinds of swine to prey on teenage recruits, and their families, while they're vulnerable and, in many cases, deployed overseas. But that's exactly the kind of scam that Mick Mulvaney sees as having been inconvenienced by the activities of the CFPB. From Military.com:

The report said these lenders damage morale and hurt our military preparedness.Payday lenders typically require borrowers to endorse a postdated check and then trap them into rolling the loan over repeatedly at annual percentage rates that can top 400 percent. The average payday borrower pays back $827 on a $339 loan."I applaud the Defense Department's report," Mr. Calhoun said. "Military families need protection from these predators. We must protect the people who protect us."


The report also admits that the Department of Defense is ill-equipped to deal with this problem itself, that it needs the kind of help the CFPB was designed specifically to provide.

snip//

After all, what good is "eliminating the administrative state" if you can't make a buck on it?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pierce: The Trump Regime ...