Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs Nina Turner set to put another feather in her cap in the Michigan primary?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 980 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Nina Turner set to put another feather in her cap in the Michigan primary? (Original Post)
redstateblues
Aug 2018
OP
I'm being a little facetious. She seems to lose almost every race she runs. I wish she would go away
redstateblues
Aug 2018
#3
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)1. No. Not if you trust the polling out of MI.
Wwcd
(6,288 posts)2. Another?
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)3. I'm being a little facetious. She seems to lose almost every race she runs. I wish she would go away
still_one
(92,325 posts)4. She is a divisionary force who does not wish to work with or within the Democratic party.
Cha
(297,493 posts)5. All her candidate does is disingenuously smear Gretchen Whitmer
Gothmog
(145,479 posts)6. Our Revolution has been not doing well
JCanete
(5,272 posts)7. I think Our Revolution's done alright actually. You want to set an unrealistic bar for a small
fledgling organization, then I guess you can make any point you want to about their record, but they are supporting candidates who don't take big donor money for the most part, and that puts all of them at a huge disadvantage. I'm not a member of our revolution and haven't looked at them closely enough yet to jump on board, but I think you should be more fair given the massive resource gap at play. At least at some point their record was looking pretty good too, all things considered. I'm not sure if its dipped off, but if they're doing from 20 to 40 percent given who their endorsing, that's crazy good really.