Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RDANGELO

(3,433 posts)
Fri Jul 13, 2018, 03:54 AM Jul 2018

Strzok bias and conduct

As I watched the congressional hearing with stzrok today, I noticed the one word that kept being repeated - bias. Bias bias bias. Stzrok was biased against Trump. Everybody is biased. With the polarization in politics today, you had a man sitting there being accused of bias. The question that they should have been getting at is conduct; did Stzroks bias against Trump cause misconduct in the Russia investigation. There is no proof of that, and they were not going to get any information on the conduct of the investigation from Stzrok because it is an ongoing investigation. Therefore the whole hearing was pointless.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

0rganism

(23,954 posts)
2. i think there was a pretty clear point
Fri Jul 13, 2018, 04:20 AM
Jul 2018

imho, unmistakable. the visuals, the imagery of outraged GOP congresspeople facing off against an FBI official accused implicitly of professional misconduct and procedurally unable to properly answer the charges. turning an institution as durable as the FBI into an "enemy of the people" is a complex objective, and holding this hearing was one of many smaller steps necessary to achieve it.

Reagan was right about the B-reel. nothing hurts them quite like having that stock footage dominated by the obvious assholes who used to work for Agent Orange getting marched into court to drop their pathetic meeping guilty pleas. likewise, nothing helps them more than images suitable for seeding a preconception that the investigators and prosecutors are on some sort of mysterious deep state take to behave unethically.

so they don't need an orderly hearing in which important things are discovered and useful conclusions are reached in a collaborative bipartisan manner. in fact, that's the worst possible means of advancing their cause. the more vulgar and circus-like they can make it, the worse the flavor left in memory by the stock footage from this news cycle, and the more tainted the FBI by proxy.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
4. If bias should have excluded him, then NONE of those GOP Senators
Fri Jul 13, 2018, 06:32 AM
Jul 2018

had any business investigating Hillary Clinton.

Because bias.

bucolic_frolic

(43,161 posts)
5. Logic doesn't work on these GOP people
Fri Jul 13, 2018, 06:32 AM
Jul 2018

you have to fight them with visuals, demeanor, dominance, and votes

Peter Strzok really hit home runs with outrage, facts, and relentless assertiveness

This hearing may have turned the tables on Gowdy and the Investigative Gang of Four

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
6. Someone on MJ this am noted that VP Pence was biased against Trump early in 2016...
Fri Jul 13, 2018, 06:44 AM
Jul 2018

...due to comments he made regarding Trump's candidacy. Should he resign?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Strzok bias and conduct