Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 08:59 AM Aug 2012

Remember When Homeland Security issued a report about terror threats from the military?

And remember how the Republicans got their panties in a wad about it?

"I am disturbed and personally offended by the Department of Homeland Security's view that returning military veterans and gun owners are likely to commit terrorist acts," said Gus Bilirakis (R-FL).

Said the DHS Report, "The consequences of a prolonged economic downturn—including real estate foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability to obtain credit—could create a fertile recruiting environment for rightwing extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and government authorities similar to those in the past."

So Republican policies of easy access to firearms AND the Republican policy of keeping the economy in the toilet for as long as possible might - just might - lead to incidents were individuals who are already mentally unstable might be pushed over the edge. And if these persons were former military, there could be dangerous consequences.

I'm so terribly sorry that Rep. Bilirakis had his tender feelings hurt. Really. So terribly shocked that something as horrible as that could happen.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remember When Homeland Security issued a report about terror threats from the military? (Original Post) Jeff In Milwaukee Aug 2012 OP
You mean when Janet Napolitano had to issue an apology for suggesting that ex-military msanthrope Aug 2012 #1
Yes. How DARE she examine the evidence dispassionately... Jeff In Milwaukee Aug 2012 #2
This fucker was dishonorably discharged in 1998...Fort Bragg, psyops. nt msanthrope Aug 2012 #4
Psyops? Dishonorable? SQUEE Aug 2012 #5
Little slip there at the end. JoeyT Aug 2012 #7
I can see where you might think it was my idea, SQUEE Aug 2012 #8
Sorry about that. JoeyT Aug 2012 #12
Here's the report.... msanthrope Aug 2012 #3
Thanks for posting that Jeff In Milwaukee Aug 2012 #6
that is downright scary LittleGirl Aug 2012 #9
This guy was a peacetime soldier with no combat experience hack89 Aug 2012 #11
They have weapons training in the military Jeff In Milwaukee Aug 2012 #14
Wade was NOT a "returning" veteran. TahitiNut Aug 2012 #10
Read the report... Jeff In Milwaukee Aug 2012 #13
I understand that. TahitiNut Aug 2012 #15
It's not "because" he's a returning veteran... Jeff In Milwaukee Aug 2012 #16
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
1. You mean when Janet Napolitano had to issue an apology for suggesting that ex-military
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:07 AM
Aug 2012

might be recruited for terror attacks?????

I hate that she was right.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
2. Yes. How DARE she examine the evidence dispassionately...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:11 AM
Aug 2012

and come to logical conclusions.

She clearly hates America.

SQUEE

(1,315 posts)
5. Psyops? Dishonorable?
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:20 AM
Aug 2012

Please define what you think you are saying, I am only seeing that he was less than honorable, and also so called PsyOps could be anything from a information specialist to an interogator, it is no where as sinister as people are making it out to be. Looks like this guy started out in ADA, then changed his MOS after his Hawk program was shuttered... Lets not add some form of sinister credibility to an obvious shitbird.

This douche probably never even served in combat and thought he was "gonna get him a hadji" never realizing Sikhs have been very instrumental in fighting Islam for centuries...

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
7. Little slip there at the end.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 11:25 AM
Aug 2012

We're not supposed to be "fighting Islam", as you put it.

Or at least we're not supposed to admit that it was a holy war under Bush.

SQUEE

(1,315 posts)
8. I can see where you might think it was my idea,
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 11:33 AM
Aug 2012

should have added a roll eyes, was more trying to convey the thought process of the types that see anyone in Mufti as a muslim and a terrorist.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
6. Thanks for posting that
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:24 AM
Aug 2012

I should have remembered to do it with the OP.

From the Report, "Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists. DHS/I&A is concerned that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to boost their violent capabilities."

There has also been persistent concern (I found an article dated 1996) that White Supremacists were using the military for training purposes. They join with no intention of defending their country -- just to get weapons and tactical training that they can use against civilian authorities later.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
11. This guy was a peacetime soldier with no combat experience
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:04 PM
Aug 2012

he doesn't even appear to have served in the combat arms.

He was kicked out of the Army 14 years ago - a lot can happen in 14 years.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
14. They have weapons training in the military
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:01 PM
Aug 2012

And this guy hit the SLPC's radar of hate groups back in 2000. He has a history.

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
10. Wade was NOT a "returning" veteran.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:02 PM
Aug 2012

He served in a peacetime Army and got a "less-than-honorable" discharge. That alone, IMHO, should disqualify him on a background check.

As a Viet Nam veteran, I'm all-too-aware of the stigma associated with being a "returning veteran" and take umbrage at smears against a demographic of which I'm a part.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
13. Read the report...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:33 PM
Aug 2012

Edit: The guy was on the Southern Povery Law Center's radar starting in 2000. Unless he had a "Saul on the Road to Damascus" moment sometime in 1999, this guy was bad news on the day he was discharged.

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
15. I understand that.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 02:37 PM
Aug 2012

But, it's NOT due to him being a "returning veteran" ... and I'm pretty sure the seeds of his problems were evident even before he enlisted. But sometimes they're desperate for warm bodies. As I've said, I don't believe someone with a "less-that-honorable" discharge should pass a background check. In MY ideal USA, an honorable discharge (into the "well-regulated militia&quot should be a prerequisite for gun ownership.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
16. It's not "because" he's a returning veteran...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 03:23 PM
Aug 2012

As the report says, you're talking about young men (mostly) who are prone to making very bad decisions even under ideal conditions. And given ongoing economic hardships and a 24/7 diet of rightwing radio, these are persons who are highly susceptible to being recruited. Combine that with the fact that white supremacist groups are actively seeking out these young men, and you have the potential for trouble.

And as I said elsewhere, some white supremacist groups are using the military as a training program for militants who will later turn these skills on civilian law enforcement officers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember When Homeland Se...