General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBooker: The subject of an investigation should not pick his judges
Link to tweet
@SethAbramson:
YES! Booker has adopted the legal argument I and other attorneys have put forward as to why the Senate cannot permitwithout its own legal liabilitythe subject of an Obstruction investigation to interview the judges that will ultimately hear his case. It's legally impermissible.
@KeithBoykin:
Senator Cory Booker: "The president of the United States is a subject of an ongoing criminal investigation...that could end up before the Supreme Court," so any Trump SCOTUS nomination should be "delayed until the Mueller investigation is concluded."
BigmanPigman
(51,635 posts)He is speaking on MSNBC right now. He is urging people to speak up. Ari Melber wasn't able to get the exact strategies and tactics out of him on national TV. I am glad the Dems do have strategies and are going to fight this.
Every American can not be silent! This is crucial and we must RESIST! Activists and organizers need to have the town halls, calls to our reps, protests, etc. Call the Senate (202) 224-3121. Spread the word!
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)csziggy
(34,138 posts)Since his appointment was by the person whole instituted it. I expect any of the Republi-- er, conservative Justices will follow Clarence Thomas' lead and not recuse themselves even from cases where they have blatant conflicts of interest.
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)But no one can challenge a SC justice if he does not recuse.
janterry
(4,429 posts)OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,311 posts)total conflict of interest
Sen. Booker has unearthed a powerful argument here
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,045 posts)Don't tie it to Mueller specifically because somebody else would pick it up, maybe even a Democratic House.
And "orderly way" would preclude firing Mueller as a way to end it.
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)Cory Booker for president! pls run.
thinkingagain
(906 posts)Or any other orders that has to do with our country
kimbutgar
(21,211 posts)Should memorize this statement and say it like a robot. Great talking point.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)OliverQ
(3,363 posts)absolutely mind blowing that the subject of multiple criminal investigations can pick the Judges who will decide elements related to that investigation.
It should be illegal for Republicans to confirm a new Justice under these circumstances.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Keep on fighting them and never give up. It is people like you who keeps the flame of hope going for the rest of us.
JHan
(10,173 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,768 posts)There are probably Senators and Representatives who are also subject to the investigation that perhaps we don't know about. I've heard that lots of Republican Congressmen got some of that NRA money that was paid for out of Russian donations. I would be surprise to find out that McConnell, Ryan, Nunes and many others get caught up in this investigation. I'm not surprised that they are calling for an end, hoping they will quit looking before they get to them.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)if you can pull this off, you may get my vote in the 2020 Democratic primaries - I've never committed early to a candidate, but this would do it for me.