Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 05:07 AM Aug 2012

To put the Mars landing in perspective...

Last edited Tue Aug 7, 2012, 03:35 AM - Edit history (2)

One of the engineers at the NASA press conference mentioned that landing Curiosity on Mars cost the US about $7 per US citizen. A quick back of the napkin calculation shows the war in Iraq has cost $2588 per US citizen. Or in other words for the cost of the war in Iraq they could have landed about 370 Mars rovers. I'm not even going to bother to mention how much could have been accomplished in other sectors with such money.

The result of the Mars landing? Mountains of invaluable scientific research. An inspiration to an entire generation of young minds to reach for the stars, quit literally (and apply themselves in school to get there). Off shoot, unintended, engineering / scientific developments which will ripple back through society. An expansion of our understanding of the universe and our place in it. A shining example of how different countries can come together peacefully to contribute to something that gives back to all and is so much more than the sum of its parts.

Result of the war in Iraq? 4400+ US troops killed, 100-500,000 Iraqi's killed. Families torn apart. US international image dragged through the mud. International relations severed or severely strained. A likely contributing factor to the largest global meltdown since the great depression (we haven't seen the end of this yet). Unknown but doubtless great harm done to archaeological and other cultural sites of importance in Iraq. A shining example of how one country, unchecked, overpowered, over militarized, under-educated and ignorant can single handedly break the ties that bond the world together in the best of times and thrust us into the worst.

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To put the Mars landing in perspective... (Original Post) Locut0s Aug 2012 OP
Good cost comparison DontTreadOnMe Aug 2012 #1
Good Post dballance Aug 2012 #2
Science, exploration and knowledge are always worth it, IMHO. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #3
Republicans Detest Facts, Science and Knowledge. They Love War. They Paid For Their Blood Lust cantbeserious Aug 2012 #4
+10000 Missycim Aug 2012 #7
sadly we all pay barbtries Aug 2012 #8
Bingo. GaYellowDawg Aug 2012 #9
I'd bet that... Plucketeer Aug 2012 #22
I don't wanna talk to a scientist, y'all muther fuckas lyin' and gettin me pissed. progressoid Aug 2012 #12
Because nothing pays like war. Helps Wall St, creates jobs and gives some people pride. raouldukelives Aug 2012 #17
+1, Only 6% of US Scientist consider themselve GOP uponit7771 Aug 2012 #19
I don't think republicans should be allowed to celebrate Curiosity's successful delivery to Mars aka-chmeee Aug 2012 #44
It's another example of gubmint not doing anything right. bulloney Aug 2012 #5
Great post! longship Aug 2012 #6
Thanks, my spelling has always been atrocious, even though my prose is fairly good. nt Locut0s Aug 2012 #48
K&R! So very well said! Rhiannon12866 Aug 2012 #10
K & R. May I share this? mac56 Aug 2012 #11
Excellent post malaise Aug 2012 #13
I'll second that... Jeff In Milwaukee Aug 2012 #14
Sources for figures used in those calculations would be awesome. snot Aug 2012 #15
SOURCES... Locut0s Aug 2012 #46
Thank you! This I can use. snot Aug 2012 #59
When people say we need to go to Mars Johonny Aug 2012 #16
Great point. MatthewStLouis Aug 2012 #18
Good perspective! BrendaBrick Aug 2012 #20
Spending priorities Ron Obvious Aug 2012 #21
I might add one more thing freethought Aug 2012 #23
Squandered. That's the word I think of when I think of the Bush administration. CrispyQ Aug 2012 #24
Imagine what they could do with the climate change issue lunatica Aug 2012 #25
+1 Faygo Kid Aug 2012 #26
Yes. Most of the $2581 per US citizen remaining should have been invested in that, instead of Amonester Aug 2012 #28
Do you think the Curiosity budget, or even NASA's, could do all of that? Posteritatis Aug 2012 #32
Investing in space is a good long term tactic lunatica Aug 2012 #37
+1 mike_c Aug 2012 #47
+1000000000! FailureToCommunicate Aug 2012 #52
What else has the illegal and immoral war in Iraq accomplished? Raster Aug 2012 #27
I have no problem with the $7 per US citizen. RebelOne Aug 2012 #29
Mars mission cost less than Pentagon's A/C budget Nevernose Aug 2012 #30
Here's a great comment by Phil Plait: The Bad Astronomer LongTomH Aug 2012 #31
Hmmm. That *has* to be the worst $2588 I have ever spent (nt) Nye Bevan Aug 2012 #33
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Aug 2012 #34
Maybe with 370 Mars Rovers we would have found the WMD ashling Aug 2012 #35
Bravo KauaiK Aug 2012 #36
Yeah, All of NASA's budget for all of time is equal to about RoccoR5955 Aug 2012 #38
Comparing apples to oranges magic59 Aug 2012 #39
Can you tell us what NASA's budget is, or how many people it employs, without using Google? (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2012 #41
Can you ol great one? magic59 Aug 2012 #53
Yes, actually, I can. If you think NASA's budget's the problem you need a few clues. (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2012 #56
The fail is so amazingly strong with this one.... (nt) eqfan592 Aug 2012 #43
Yes, NASA 1, the American tax payer 0 magic59 Aug 2012 #54
American tax payer 1 Austerians/know nothings/science haters 0 neverforget Aug 2012 #58
I will be happy to see NASA gutted along with the Pentagon... mike_c Aug 2012 #45
Great Post! burrowowl Aug 2012 #40
Well put ... N_E_1 for Tennis Aug 2012 #42
You're welcome :) nt Locut0s Aug 2012 #49
Excellent post! luv_mykatz Aug 2012 #50
Wiki says Iraq is more like $6,300 per citizen. I'll take space exploration, instead, Alex. DirkGently Aug 2012 #51
Now is not the time to point fingers.....n/t Hotler Aug 2012 #55
Your post covers a lot of ground. jaysunb Aug 2012 #57
Perspective... reeds2012 Aug 2012 #60
+1,000 Rec JohnnyRingo Aug 2012 #61
book marked for money references.... MrsBrady Aug 2012 #62
 

DontTreadOnMe

(2,442 posts)
1. Good cost comparison
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 05:22 AM
Aug 2012

Write details about what we "could" be doing... and more people will see the light.

FORWARD.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
3. Science, exploration and knowledge are always worth it, IMHO.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 05:43 AM
Aug 2012

It's sad that even when we see an amazing triumph like this; and make no mistake, this was a technological and engineering achievement of tremendous magnitude; inevitably people will complain about the price tag. Despite the fact that NASA recieves a tiny sliver of the discretionary budget, they can't sneeze without the press and the naysayers reminding us how much everything they do costs.

Here are some appalling costs, for you: The Military Industrial Complex, cashing out at around a Trillion a year. The Prison-Industrial Complex. The fact that, even above and beyond costs of local law enforcement, prosecution, and incarceration, we spend $60 Billion a year to keep cancer grannies from smoking pot. 60 Billion! That's 24 Mars Rovers. A year.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
22. I'd bet that...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:52 PM
Aug 2012

THE day of 9/11, the Bush regime already KNEW they were gonna fight the resultant war on credit. If they asked the American people to do it (pay out of pocket, that is) - they would have - for a time. But once it really started to sink in - the cost - in dollars and lives...... Heh - Bush and his mafia would've been run outta DC on a rail!

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
17. Because nothing pays like war. Helps Wall St, creates jobs and gives some people pride.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 10:10 AM
Aug 2012

I'm actually kind of surprised Nasa hasn't been privatized yet. You know if they could it'd be a no-bid contract with Halliburton. But of course they know the rocket would fall apart halfway so they probably figure its best to do some things correct.

aka-chmeee

(1,132 posts)
44. I don't think republicans should be allowed to celebrate Curiosity's successful delivery to Mars
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:34 PM
Aug 2012

They seem to hate anyone with more than a Sunday school education.

bulloney

(4,113 posts)
5. It's another example of gubmint not doing anything right.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:20 AM
Aug 2012


Great perspective on comparing the cost per U.S. citizen. We never seem to have a shortage of money for warmongering. Everything else....

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
14. I'll second that...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:07 AM
Aug 2012

Imagine what we could accomplish if we spent a sane and rational amount of our national wealth on defense.

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
46. SOURCES...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:35 PM
Aug 2012

The quote that the mars rover cost $7 per person comes from one of the NASA officials ( Charles Erlachi I believe ) at the Mars landing press conference held right after the landing:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/08/curiosity-lands/

"The rover was subject to delays and cost overruns, eventually coming in at a total cost of $2.5 billion. During the press conference, NASA officials pointed out that this amount to roughly $7 per U.S. citizen"

I did my own calculations based on the published MSL cost and the US population and I got $8, but still that's about the same. As for the cost of the Iraq war per capita that's just the total war cost divided by the total US population:

Total cost of Iraq war: http://costofwar.com/ (I rounded it off to 805 billion)

Total US population: https://www.google.ca/search?q=us+population&rlz=1C1CHFX_enCA469CA469&sugexp=chrome,mod=0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 (I rounded it off to 311 million)

The facts about the number of casualties in the iraq war come from here: http://usliberals.about.com/od/homelandsecurit1/a/IraqNumbers.htm

The estimates for the number of Iraqi casualties range anywhere from 50 to 600,000 so I posted a range of 100 to 500,000.

MatthewStLouis

(904 posts)
18. Great point.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 11:17 AM
Aug 2012

Science spending pays real dividends to humankind, not only as progress in knowledge and technology, but as advancement of spirit. Go Curiosity!



BrendaBrick

(1,296 posts)
20. Good perspective!
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:02 PM
Aug 2012

Here are two other perspectives along the same lines:

Bill Hicks:



...Here's what we can do to change the world, right now, into a better ride. Take all that money we spend on weapons and defense each year and, instead, spend it feeding, clothing and educating the poor of the world, which it would do many times over - not one human being excluded - and we can explore space together, both inner and outer, forever. In peace.

Edgar Mitchell: (Note - have to turn up the volume)



<snip>
from http://www.globaldashboard.org/2011/09/20/a-moment-of-perfect-cognitive-dissonance/

Nor was he the only astronaut to have an experience of this kind:

Other astronauts have had comparable experiences – a ‘wow’ at seeing Earth in the larger scheme of things. We have talked about it over the years, and there’s even been a book written about it by Frank White, called The Overview Effect, which describes all our experiences. We have all said over the years, if we could get our political leaders to have a summit meeting in space, life on Earth would be markedly different, because you can’t continue living that way once you have seen the bigger picture. (bold = mine)

I read this during a break in an all-day meeting of senior policymakers at the United Nations, on the subject of ’global sustainability’. Know what? The room had no windows.
 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
21. Spending priorities
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:15 PM
Aug 2012

Good point. Remember also that story that came out a couple of years ago, that we spend more than 20 Billion dollars annually to provide airconditioning in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is higher than the entire NASA budget.

Insanity.

freethought

(2,457 posts)
23. I might add one more thing
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:12 PM
Aug 2012

Iraq is actually becoming friendly with Iran, probably the last thing that the neocon chickenhawks wanted to see in their twisted ambition to remake the mid-east in the U.S. image.

CrispyQ

(36,464 posts)
24. Squandered. That's the word I think of when I think of the Bush administration.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:26 PM
Aug 2012

They squandered the good will of the rest of the world after 911 with their arrogance. They squandered our treasury on their illegal wars. They squandered the opportunity to unite our country & instead actively worked to deepen any divisions.

Such a goddamned fucking waste.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
25. Imagine what they could do with the climate change issue
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:43 PM
Aug 2012

They could put dollars into alternate forms of energy and skycraper farming.


Ocean turbines














Amonester

(11,541 posts)
28. Yes. Most of the $2581 per US citizen remaining should have been invested in that, instead of
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 03:34 PM
Aug 2012

wasted in these wars of aggression.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
32. Do you think the Curiosity budget, or even NASA's, could do all of that?
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 03:40 PM
Aug 2012

What do you think those budgets are?

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
37. Investing in space is a good long term tactic
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 04:36 PM
Aug 2012

Eventually it will not only pay off, but possibly save us. I have nothing against the space program. I do, however, have a great deal against our military spending.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
27. What else has the illegal and immoral war in Iraq accomplished?
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 03:32 PM
Aug 2012

(1) The entire world was a witness to a drunken, sociopathic Bush* attempting to work through his "daddy" issues; and
(2) All that lovely oil is now accessible to the worldwide petroleum mafia.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
29. I have no problem with the $7 per US citizen.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 03:36 PM
Aug 2012

I will gladly pay that rather than the thousands it is costing each of us for the useless Iraqi war.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
30. Mars mission cost less than Pentagon's A/C budget
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 03:37 PM
Aug 2012

In fact, the entire yearly budgets of NASA since inception in the 50s added together are about half of one year's expanded military budget (expanded because so much of a year's military budget is listed under separate budgets, like VA or nuclear weapons).

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
31. Here's a great comment by Phil Plait: The Bad Astronomer
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 03:39 PM
Aug 2012
The news these days is filled with polarization, with hate, with fear, with ignorance. But while these feelings are a part of us, and always will be, they neither dominate nor define us. Not if we don’t let them. When we reach, when we explore, when we’re curious – that’s when we’re at our best. We can learn about the world around us, the Universe around us. It doesn’t divide us, or separate us, or create artificial and wholly made-up barriers between us. As we saw on Twitter, at New York Times Square where hundreds of people watched the landing live, and all over the world: science and exploration bind us together. Science makes the world a better place, and it makes us better people.

It’s what we can do, and what we must do.


Read the rest here: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/06/mars-orbiter-catches-pic-of-curiosity-on-its-way-down/

ashling

(25,771 posts)
35. Maybe with 370 Mars Rovers we would have found the WMD
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 04:17 PM
Aug 2012

Think what we could have accomplished with a brazillion Mars Rover

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
38. Yeah, All of NASA's budget for all of time is equal to about
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 04:46 PM
Aug 2012

what it takes to air condition military brass in Iraq for a year.

WHERE ARE OUR PRIORITIES?!?!?!

 

magic59

(429 posts)
39. Comparing apples to oranges
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 05:42 PM
Aug 2012

We all agree that wars are always a mistake and a huge waste of money. But being big man in space while keeping the NASA industrial complex going isn't very prudent for a nation with a large % of its population living in poverty and a huge debt that rich corporations are no help paying off.
On FOX snooze a NASA boy was crying about how Obama was cutting NASA programs then this nut had the nerve to compare NASA expense to social security and medicare, like, spending money looking for pretty rocks on mars is much better then helping the poor and elderly.
NASA should be gutted along with the Pentagon.

 

magic59

(429 posts)
53. Can you ol great one?
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 08:40 PM
Aug 2012

I know you are drunk on NASA kool aid but they have been bilking the American tax payer for decades. Its just more corporate welfare.
For those who want to play space cowboy I suggest you do it on your own dime and leave us earth bound taxpayers out of it.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
45. I will be happy to see NASA gutted along with the Pentagon...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:34 PM
Aug 2012

...as long as the Pentagon takes a budget hit deep enough to bring it to NASA's level first. After that, if we still can't afford to explore and dream, then continue cutting the military budget, and match the cuts one-to-one with cuts to NASA. Talk about comparing apples to oranges....

N_E_1 for Tennis

(9,722 posts)
42. Well put ...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 05:49 PM
Aug 2012

Already I have used you comparsion with a neighbor.
He was astounded! "Never thought of it that way" he remarked.

Thanks, ran in to reply to let ya know!!

luv_mykatz

(441 posts)
50. Excellent post!
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:46 PM
Aug 2012

Investing in war = investing in body bags, and things that can only be shot off, blown up, etc. Absolutely horrifying waste of our treasure: people's lives; nature and natural resources; supposedly intelligent minds focused on destruction instead of solving the many challenges we face.

Investing in expanding our knowledge of our solar system and how it was formed: simply priceless!

reeds2012

(91 posts)
60. Perspective...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 11:38 PM
Aug 2012

Putting a robot on Mars: $2.5 billion. TSA budget 2012: $7.85 billion.

And the robot works.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»To put the Mars landing i...