General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTo put the Mars landing in perspective...
Last edited Tue Aug 7, 2012, 03:35 AM - Edit history (2)
One of the engineers at the NASA press conference mentioned that landing Curiosity on Mars cost the US about $7 per US citizen. A quick back of the napkin calculation shows the war in Iraq has cost $2588 per US citizen. Or in other words for the cost of the war in Iraq they could have landed about 370 Mars rovers. I'm not even going to bother to mention how much could have been accomplished in other sectors with such money.
The result of the Mars landing? Mountains of invaluable scientific research. An inspiration to an entire generation of young minds to reach for the stars, quit literally (and apply themselves in school to get there). Off shoot, unintended, engineering / scientific developments which will ripple back through society. An expansion of our understanding of the universe and our place in it. A shining example of how different countries can come together peacefully to contribute to something that gives back to all and is so much more than the sum of its parts.
Result of the war in Iraq? 4400+ US troops killed, 100-500,000 Iraqi's killed. Families torn apart. US international image dragged through the mud. International relations severed or severely strained. A likely contributing factor to the largest global meltdown since the great depression (we haven't seen the end of this yet). Unknown but doubtless great harm done to archaeological and other cultural sites of importance in Iraq. A shining example of how one country, unchecked, overpowered, over militarized, under-educated and ignorant can single handedly break the ties that bond the world together in the best of times and thrust us into the worst.
DontTreadOnMe
(2,442 posts)Write details about what we "could" be doing... and more people will see the light.
FORWARD.
dballance
(5,756 posts)Every day I shake my head when I think of how we decide what our priorities are.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's sad that even when we see an amazing triumph like this; and make no mistake, this was a technological and engineering achievement of tremendous magnitude; inevitably people will complain about the price tag. Despite the fact that NASA recieves a tiny sliver of the discretionary budget, they can't sneeze without the press and the naysayers reminding us how much everything they do costs.
Here are some appalling costs, for you: The Military Industrial Complex, cashing out at around a Trillion a year. The Prison-Industrial Complex. The fact that, even above and beyond costs of local law enforcement, prosecution, and incarceration, we spend $60 Billion a year to keep cancer grannies from smoking pot. 60 Billion! That's 24 Mars Rovers. A year.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
nt
barbtries
(28,794 posts)for their blood lust. and their greed.
GaYellowDawg
(4,447 posts)Too damn bad payment wasn't limited to Republicans.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)THE day of 9/11, the Bush regime already KNEW they were gonna fight the resultant war on credit. If they asked the American people to do it (pay out of pocket, that is) - they would have - for a time. But once it really started to sink in - the cost - in dollars and lives...... Heh - Bush and his mafia would've been run outta DC on a rail!
progressoid
(49,990 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)I'm actually kind of surprised Nasa hasn't been privatized yet. You know if they could it'd be a no-bid contract with Halliburton. But of course they know the rocket would fall apart halfway so they probably figure its best to do some things correct.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)aka-chmeee
(1,132 posts)They seem to hate anyone with more than a Sunday school education.
bulloney
(4,113 posts)Great perspective on comparing the cost per U.S. citizen. We never seem to have a shortage of money for warmongering. Everything else....
longship
(40,416 posts)BTW, it's spelled "shining".
Fix that and it's perfect.
Locut0s
(6,154 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,373 posts)mac56
(17,567 posts)malaise
(268,998 posts)Rec
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Imagine what we could accomplish if we spent a sane and rational amount of our national wealth on defense.
snot
(10,529 posts)The quote that the mars rover cost $7 per person comes from one of the NASA officials ( Charles Erlachi I believe ) at the Mars landing press conference held right after the landing:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/08/curiosity-lands/
"The rover was subject to delays and cost overruns, eventually coming in at a total cost of $2.5 billion. During the press conference, NASA officials pointed out that this amount to roughly $7 per U.S. citizen"
I did my own calculations based on the published MSL cost and the US population and I got $8, but still that's about the same. As for the cost of the Iraq war per capita that's just the total war cost divided by the total US population:
Total cost of Iraq war: http://costofwar.com/ (I rounded it off to 805 billion)
Total US population: https://www.google.ca/search?q=us+population&rlz=1C1CHFX_enCA469CA469&sugexp=chrome,mod=0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 (I rounded it off to 311 million)
The facts about the number of casualties in the iraq war come from here: http://usliberals.about.com/od/homelandsecurit1/a/IraqNumbers.htm
The estimates for the number of Iraqi casualties range anywhere from 50 to 600,000 so I posted a range of 100 to 500,000.
snot
(10,529 posts)Johonny
(20,851 posts)I point out "We're already there."
MatthewStLouis
(904 posts)Science spending pays real dividends to humankind, not only as progress in knowledge and technology, but as advancement of spirit. Go Curiosity!
BrendaBrick
(1,296 posts)Here are two other perspectives along the same lines:
Bill Hicks:
...Here's what we can do to change the world, right now, into a better ride. Take all that money we spend on weapons and defense each year and, instead, spend it feeding, clothing and educating the poor of the world, which it would do many times over - not one human being excluded - and we can explore space together, both inner and outer, forever. In peace.
Edgar Mitchell: (Note - have to turn up the volume)
<snip>
from http://www.globaldashboard.org/2011/09/20/a-moment-of-perfect-cognitive-dissonance/
Nor was he the only astronaut to have an experience of this kind:
Other astronauts have had comparable experiences a wow at seeing Earth in the larger scheme of things. We have talked about it over the years, and theres even been a book written about it by Frank White, called The Overview Effect, which describes all our experiences. We have all said over the years, if we could get our political leaders to have a summit meeting in space, life on Earth would be markedly different, because you cant continue living that way once you have seen the bigger picture. (bold = mine)
I read this during a break in an all-day meeting of senior policymakers at the United Nations, on the subject of global sustainability. Know what? The room had no windows.
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)Good point. Remember also that story that came out a couple of years ago, that we spend more than 20 Billion dollars annually to provide airconditioning in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is higher than the entire NASA budget.
Insanity.
freethought
(2,457 posts)Iraq is actually becoming friendly with Iran, probably the last thing that the neocon chickenhawks wanted to see in their twisted ambition to remake the mid-east in the U.S. image.
CrispyQ
(36,464 posts)They squandered the good will of the rest of the world after 911 with their arrogance. They squandered our treasury on their illegal wars. They squandered the opportunity to unite our country & instead actively worked to deepen any divisions.
Such a goddamned fucking waste.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)They could put dollars into alternate forms of energy and skycraper farming.
Ocean turbines
Amonester
(11,541 posts)wasted in these wars of aggression.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)What do you think those budgets are?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Eventually it will not only pay off, but possibly save us. I have nothing against the space program. I do, however, have a great deal against our military spending.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)(1) The entire world was a witness to a drunken, sociopathic Bush* attempting to work through his "daddy" issues; and
(2) All that lovely oil is now accessible to the worldwide petroleum mafia.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I will gladly pay that rather than the thousands it is costing each of us for the useless Iraqi war.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)In fact, the entire yearly budgets of NASA since inception in the 50s added together are about half of one year's expanded military budget (expanded because so much of a year's military budget is listed under separate budgets, like VA or nuclear weapons).
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)Its what we can do, and what we must do.
Read the rest here: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/06/mars-orbiter-catches-pic-of-curiosity-on-its-way-down/
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)Think what we could have accomplished with a brazillion Mars Rover
Oh that the US would spend as much on NASA as it does on foreign wars. Bravo!
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)what it takes to air condition military brass in Iraq for a year.
WHERE ARE OUR PRIORITIES?!?!?!
magic59
(429 posts)We all agree that wars are always a mistake and a huge waste of money. But being big man in space while keeping the NASA industrial complex going isn't very prudent for a nation with a large % of its population living in poverty and a huge debt that rich corporations are no help paying off.
On FOX snooze a NASA boy was crying about how Obama was cutting NASA programs then this nut had the nerve to compare NASA expense to social security and medicare, like, spending money looking for pretty rocks on mars is much better then helping the poor and elderly.
NASA should be gutted along with the Pentagon.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)magic59
(429 posts)I know you are drunk on NASA kool aid but they have been bilking the American tax payer for decades. Its just more corporate welfare.
For those who want to play space cowboy I suggest you do it on your own dime and leave us earth bound taxpayers out of it.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)eqfan592
(5,963 posts)magic59
(429 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)...as long as the Pentagon takes a budget hit deep enough to bring it to NASA's level first. After that, if we still can't afford to explore and dream, then continue cutting the military budget, and match the cuts one-to-one with cuts to NASA. Talk about comparing apples to oranges....
burrowowl
(17,641 posts)N_E_1 for Tennis
(9,722 posts)Already I have used you comparsion with a neighbor.
He was astounded! "Never thought of it that way" he remarked.
Thanks, ran in to reply to let ya know!!
Locut0s
(6,154 posts)luv_mykatz
(441 posts)Investing in war = investing in body bags, and things that can only be shot off, blown up, etc. Absolutely horrifying waste of our treasure: people's lives; nature and natural resources; supposedly intelligent minds focused on destruction instead of solving the many challenges we face.
Investing in expanding our knowledge of our solar system and how it was formed: simply priceless!
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Hotler
(11,421 posts)jaysunb
(11,856 posts)And, done quite nicely.
reeds2012
(91 posts)Putting a robot on Mars: $2.5 billion. TSA budget 2012: $7.85 billion.
And the robot works.
JohnnyRingo
(18,628 posts)MrsBrady
(4,187 posts)thanks...