Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRosenstein asked if IG report "vindicates" Trump on collusion...
NBC News
?
Verified account
@NBCNews
JUST IN: Asked if the Justice Dept. IG report has vindicated President Trump as it relates to possible collusion, as the president has asserted, AG Rosenstein tells Congress: "There is an ongoing investigation."
?
Verified account
@NBCNews
JUST IN: Asked if the Justice Dept. IG report has vindicated President Trump as it relates to possible collusion, as the president has asserted, AG Rosenstein tells Congress: "There is an ongoing investigation."
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 4184 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (51)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rosenstein asked if IG report "vindicates" Trump on collusion... (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Jun 2018
OP
No. That means an investigator doesn't draw conclusions until all the evidence is in.
Honeycombe8
Jun 2018
#8
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)1. LOL
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)2. Justice is still investigating Comrade Casino*s TREASON against America
Good.
* aka republican draft-dodger-in-chief
Brother Buzz
(36,469 posts)3. Those smarmy assholes really, really want a gotcha moment
SonofDonald
(2,050 posts)4. It sounds like the questioner is not a puke
At the end they said "Keep on going", sounded like somebody on our side.
But yeah they are grasping at straws otherwise now, can't govern so attack it is.
ChoppinBroccoli
(3,784 posts)5. So That's A "No," Then
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)8. No. That means an investigator doesn't draw conclusions until all the evidence is in.
It likely hasn't even been considered whether the IG report vindicates him. They're still collecting evidence, then will complete analyzing it all (and esp how some evidence confirms or contradicts other)....and THEN you reach a conclusion whether to send to grand jury or not.
orangecrush
(19,624 posts)6. "HELL NO!"
TheBlackAdder
(28,222 posts)7. Was it a Trump toadie asking that question?
markbark
(1,562 posts)9. "Vindicates?"
No, congressman I think the word you're groping for is "implicates"
Nitram
(22,892 posts)10. Like little kids, these GOP congressoids.
Gothmog
(145,619 posts)11. This makes me smile