Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 09:03 PM Aug 2012

When will these gun massacres become so routine

that we all just shrug and say, 'oh well, another month, another slaughter'?

It is increasingly clear that NOBODY in government is going to do ANYTHING to stop this madness, so, what the hell, looks like we just have to live with the horror and hope and pray that 'me and mine' are not randomly chosen to be gunned down.

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When will these gun massacres become so routine (Original Post) MoonRiver Aug 2012 OP
Ten years ago at least Peepsite Aug 2012 #1
pretty soon they will become as routine as US drone massacres in the mid east nt msongs Aug 2012 #2
That is NOT the same thing and you know it. Zalatix Aug 2012 #11
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #26
people who love guns more than life are already saying no big deal fascisthunter Aug 2012 #3
Yes, and how well has that worked out for them? MoonRiver Aug 2012 #21
Them getting a clue? Nope...that's a good thing fascisthunter Aug 2012 #30
Now. (nt) enough Aug 2012 #4
10-15 years ago cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #5
Does anyone know if any former pro-gun advocates... OneGrassRoot Aug 2012 #6
I had a thread shut down for saying this after Aurora, SheilaT Aug 2012 #7
How do you stop this when owning guns is legal? n-t Logical Aug 2012 #18
Assault rifles. SheilaT Aug 2012 #19
This person had a single 9mm pistol according to CNN. N-t Logical Aug 2012 #20
An assault rifle Jenoch Aug 2012 #23
your abhorrent source for info makes you look bad tiny elvis Aug 2012 #27
Your first link Jenoch Aug 2012 #28
They're routine already. And we're numb to it xchrom Aug 2012 #8
"Will?", or "Did?" TheCowsCameHome Aug 2012 #9
Unless they happen in a movie theatre or a temple nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #10
It's true. ananda Aug 2012 #12
San Diego afternoon, on the scanner nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #13
. UnrepentantLiberal Aug 2012 #14
Right. Because people, professionals, in the schools, have been TELLING you all for 10+years MichiganVote Aug 2012 #15
you have three days to openly discuss the last massacre tiny elvis Aug 2012 #16
Is it actually becoming entertainment? MoonRiver Aug 2012 #22
gladiators running amok in the streets would not have been entertaining tiny elvis Aug 2012 #24
Are you sure? MoonRiver Aug 2012 #25
(1)The militia consists of all able-bodied citizens of this state......... Edweird Aug 2012 #29
They already are. Zoeisright Aug 2012 #17
 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
11. That is NOT the same thing and you know it.
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 10:07 PM
Aug 2012

American Exceptionalism CLEARLY states that when massacres happen to us, it is a tragedy, when it happens to pesky brown people overseas, it is the war on terror.

Response to Zalatix (Reply #11)

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
21. Yes, and how well has that worked out for them?
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:16 AM
Aug 2012

I know YOU know the answer, but are THEY getting a clue?

OneGrassRoot

(22,920 posts)
6. Does anyone know if any former pro-gun advocates...
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 09:11 PM
Aug 2012

were involved in any of these more recent incidents and subsequently became gun-control advocates?

Surely some changed their tune after witnessing such horrors?

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
7. I had a thread shut down for saying this after Aurora,
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 09:27 PM
Aug 2012

but I just want to hear some "all guns everywhere anytime are okay" person say something on the order of, "It's just fine with me that my six year old grandchild was murdered because I fully support the right of everyone to be armed."


I just wonder if those who support the current idiotic gun laws ever, ever lose someone to gun violence. And if they are simply okay with that.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
19. Assault rifles.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:18 AM
Aug 2012

clips that allow 30 or more shots. Maybe some of those shouldn't be legal.

We have some huge number of deaths every year from guns in this country. Other countries, which restrict gun ownership in sensible ways, don't have those deaths.

I just wish that the only people who got hurt in these various mass murder incidents were those, and only those who support unrestricted gun ownership.

Until you say and really mean it, It's okay if my child or grandchild or mother or brother or nephew, or any other close relative, is killed in these kinds of incidents, it's okay because everyone is entitled to assault weapons, then let's find a way to restrict some kinds of gun ownership.


I am so freaking tired of these things happening, and it's always treated as some kind of weird aberration, as if our gun laws have absolutely nothing to do with these things. Isn't it somewhat odd that these things don't happen in other countries?

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
23. An assault rifle
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:28 AM
Aug 2012

has not been documented as used in a crime in the United States since the infamous 1997 North Hollywood bank robbery and shootout in which the only loss of life were the two bank robbers.

By the way, while of course these incidents are abhorrent, they do happen in other countries. Over 70 people lost their lives to a lunatic in Norway not long ago.

tiny elvis

(979 posts)
27. your abhorrent source for info makes you look bad
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 03:36 AM
Aug 2012
http://www.buffalonews.com/city/communities/buffalo/article260214.ece
http://www.thecrimereport.org/archive/more-assault-rifles-turn-up-in-hands-of-criminals
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29423140/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/man-charged-assault-rifle-killings-teens/#.UB9gUKOcBKU

while of course these incidents are abhorrent, they do happen in other countries

that is a non sequitur, one idea does not follow reasonably from the other
without decoration-
although these incidents are bad, they (also) happen in other countries
used this way, the first idea is insincere and the second is made stupid
bereft of a predicate, the last sentence would be neutral if it were not obscurantist,
legitimizing these otherwise foolish questions-

what made people lose their lives to breivik one day?
was he lunatic the previous day when people were not losing their lives to him?
was there some specific action on his part that made people lose their lives to him?
does the awesome power of lunacy make people lose their lives to its wielders?


militia gunpeace to all
 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
28. Your first link
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 11:54 PM
Aug 2012

was to a story about semi-auto rifles and the second did not mention the make of the rifle so it is impossible to be certain it really was an assault rifle. While any murders are of course abhorrent, most media and even law enforcement make mistakes in reporting the type of weapons involved.

I wish somebody had the answers to your questions.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
8. They're routine already. And we're numb to it
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 09:28 PM
Aug 2012

Cause no one can stand the screeching threats from 2a fundies.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. Unless they happen in a movie theatre or a temple
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 10:04 PM
Aug 2012

They are pretty much routine anymore. 62 pages of incidents that qualify since 2005.

The question is what do we do now?

ananda

(28,860 posts)
12. It's true.
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 10:08 PM
Aug 2012

Some multiple shootings don't make the national news.

A month ago four people here were shot downtown
during the night scene... nobody died though.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
13. San Diego afternoon, on the scanner
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 10:34 PM
Aug 2012

Trauma one level alert, MCI declared, two dead seven to trauma centers, ne'er a pip n the media...for me out of coverage area, for rest, Tuesday afternoon in the "right" area of town.

For the record, if that was El Cajon, in area, I would have tried.

 

MichiganVote

(21,086 posts)
15. Right. Because people, professionals, in the schools, have been TELLING you all for 10+years
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 11:01 PM
Aug 2012

Did anyone listen? Oh hell no.

tiny elvis

(979 posts)
16. you have three days to openly discuss the last massacre
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 11:13 PM
Aug 2012

consent and apathy are manufactured for public venues

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
22. Is it actually becoming entertainment?
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 01:20 AM
Aug 2012

This could be the modern day version of Roman gladiator spectacles.

 

Edweird

(8,570 posts)
29. (1)The militia consists of all able-bodied citizens of this state.........
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 12:34 AM
Aug 2012

The 2012 Florida Statutes

Title XVII
MILITARY AFFAIRS AND RELATED MATTERS

Chapter 250
MILITARY AFFAIRS

View Entire Chapter
250.02?Militia.—
(1)?The militia consists of all able-bodied citizens of this state and all other able-bodied persons who have declared their intention to become citizens.
(2)?The organized militia is composed of the National Guard and any other organized military forces that are authorized by law.
(3)?The unorganized militia is composed of all persons who are subject to military duty but who are not members of units of the organized militia.
(4)?Only persons exempt from military duty by the terms of federal law are exempt from military duty in this state.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0200-0299/0250/Sections/0250.02.html






The organized militia created by the Militia Act of 1903, which split from the 1792 Uniform Militia forces, and consist of State militia forces, notably the National Guard and the Naval Militia. The National Guard however, is not to be confused with the National Guard of the United States, which is a federally recognized reserve military force, although the two are linked.
The reserve militia or unorganized militia, also created by the Militia Act of 1903 which presently consist of every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age who are not members of the National Guard or Naval Militia.(that is, anyone who would be eligible for a draft). Former members of the armed forces up to age 65 are also considered part of the "unorganized militia" per Sec 313 Title 32 of the US Code.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When will these gun massa...