Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's get this straight ..... (Original Post) Tennessee Gal Aug 2012 OP
makes it sound like Jesse James and Tiger woods were a married couple Skittles Aug 2012 #1
Ordering up an ASSKICKING for Skittles for the thought that Tiger Woods and madinmaryland Aug 2012 #2
LOL! Yes it does. nt Tennessee Gal Aug 2012 #3
I don't think they were married, or even living together! NYC_SKP Aug 2012 #4
No they were not Angry Dragon Aug 2012 #6
That was my thought too... AsahinaKimi Aug 2012 #8
He's that guy that married Sandra Bullock. JoeyT Aug 2012 #9
Snagged. Tks! patrice Aug 2012 #5
This graphic is too complicated to do the one two punch many jp11 Aug 2012 #7
Too complicated, yes. Too many words, no pictures. nt Curmudgeoness Aug 2012 #12
thats the primary argument that changed my mind PatrynXX Aug 2012 #10
Protecting "the institution of marriage" was never anything more than a thinly veiled red herring Major Nikon Aug 2012 #11
It's just a buzz word dog whistle for the bullies. xtraxritical Aug 2012 #28
Remember Flatpicker Aug 2012 #13
and the Reagans' daughter... 3catwoman3 Aug 2012 #14
K&R Jamastiene Aug 2012 #15
People say that the homosexuals will ruin marriage.... LynneSin Aug 2012 #16
They left out all tbe married pastors who sleep with people in their Heather MC Aug 2012 #25
I think my favorite response to this will always be to people who oppose gay marriage, blur256 Aug 2012 #17
WTF? jp11 Aug 2012 #18
I'm just being a little tongue-in-cheek when saying that blur256 Aug 2012 #21
And I know that may not follow completely, but hear me out blur256 Aug 2012 #20
In Summation... Godot51 Aug 2012 #19
A huge KnR HCE SuiGeneris Aug 2012 #22
Half of all marriages end in divorce. The other half end in death. tclambert Aug 2012 #23
Nah...there a few of us round kicking and screaming after 30+ years. Sheepshank Aug 2012 #27
Then your marriage hasn't ended yet. tclambert Aug 2012 #35
I count 4....but who's counting? Sheepshank Aug 2012 #36
My response sarge43 Aug 2012 #24
I knew it was Teh Gays. n/t leeroysphitz Aug 2012 #26
I truly wish that those against same sex marriage realize that same sex marriage doesn't amend.... marble falls Aug 2012 #29
I'd bet many religious conservatives would use these same examples in their argument RZM Aug 2012 #30
Who did Adam and Eve's children marry? Peaceful Protester Aug 2012 #31
uh huh. That must be the biblical-type of marriage ol' Chick-filled-with-hate is talking about. Raster Aug 2012 #32
Yet somehow we count on Hollywood to get out the vote for Dems. WTF? nt progress2k12nbynd Aug 2012 #33
Don't forget Henry the VIII. Kurovski Aug 2012 #34

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
2. Ordering up an ASSKICKING for Skittles for the thought that Tiger Woods and
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 08:57 PM
Aug 2012

Jesse James were a married couple!



JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
9. He's that guy that married Sandra Bullock.
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 09:30 PM
Aug 2012

Other than that I had to wikipedia him. Apparently he built motorcycles too.

jp11

(2,104 posts)
7. This graphic is too complicated to do the one two punch many
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 09:12 PM
Aug 2012

RW troll types like to make by posting something racist/inflammatory about democrats/liberals or any other group that offends their superior values in internet motivation-esque graphics.

I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that all but one of these chooses to nitpick individuals as the 'cause/reason' to justify the position with which I completely agree. I think that makes it a failure since anyone can nitpick individual people to 'blame' or make examples of.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
10. thats the primary argument that changed my mind
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 09:35 PM
Aug 2012

ie so if yall can break just about all 10 commandments and don't consider that a sin how are you going to pick and choose which one is? Made no sense to me and the old book is a history book. new book isn't and Jesus said nothing about homosexuals. and how are they going to be the one to shoot first (literally I had this argument after the shooting in WI with my brother saying he's surprised the Homosexuals hadn't done a mass shooting yet. Uh more like the other way round...

Similar to the Pro Life horse shit. Pro life my fucking ass. Anti abortion thats all you can put on paper. pro life doesn't exist. Maybe if your one who believes in reincarnation but other than that most anti abortion people are rich and pro death. and much of the right are farther to the right an the extreme sides of people I know personally who are anti abortion. Odds of them reading this are second to none so I can swear about it as much as I want.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
11. Protecting "the institution of marriage" was never anything more than a thinly veiled red herring
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 09:42 PM
Aug 2012

It's all about bigotry and irrational hatred, in all instances. People just want to pretend it's about protecting marriage so they don't have to admit they are bigots and assholes, even though it's immediately transparent to anyone with more than a handful of synapses actively firing.

3catwoman3

(23,987 posts)
14. and the Reagans' daughter...
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 10:01 PM
Aug 2012

...arrived about 7 months after they married. Guess they didn't "just say no."

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
16. People say that the homosexuals will ruin marriage....
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 10:30 PM
Aug 2012

However, it seems we heteros have been doing an excellent job of it for centuries.

blur256

(979 posts)
17. I think my favorite response to this will always be to people who oppose gay marriage,
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 11:01 PM
Aug 2012

is the gays make better babies. They do, when you think about it. They pick and choose when they want to reproduce instead of popping out tons of kids they don't really care about. And these people are rich and can provide for them, but what about everyone else? Sad. Just sad.

jp11

(2,104 posts)
18. WTF?
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 11:07 PM
Aug 2012

Some people might do as you describe, you are vaguely making a blanket statement about some people that simply aren't true as well as saying that gays 'make better babies'. WTF is that supposed to mean?

Not all gays are rich, nor will every gay person who chooses to have a child, or adopt 'really care' about them. It is a logical conclusion that those people will but it would be the same for a straight woman to subject her body to carrying a child for 9 months and giving birth to do the same yet it is not always true.

It is inaccurate to make such blanket stereotype statements about large groups of people.

blur256

(979 posts)
21. I'm just being a little tongue-in-cheek when saying that
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 11:16 PM
Aug 2012

because that is an argument from the right when saying that gays shouldn't be allowed to marry. They say that when people sleep together it should be towards the goal of procreation. My point it that, if that were true, then we wouldn't have all of the teen pregnancies, unwanted marriages, abortions, blah blah blah. They bring the self loathing and hatred upon themselves.

blur256

(979 posts)
20. And I know that may not follow completely, but hear me out
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 11:10 PM
Aug 2012

we have the right-wingers who preach abstinence only sex ed, because they want kids to get married and then flourish the land with their seed as it were. But we all know that doesn't work, and trust me, I know because my high school had the highest teen pregnancy rate in the state when I was going to school there. This would be the buckle of the Bible belt no less. So, if their basis for not allowing gay marriage is that gay people can't procreate, well A:that's not true, and B: they are jealous of the fact that we make better babies.

Godot51

(239 posts)
19. In Summation...
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 11:07 PM
Aug 2012

That about sums it up. We straight/white/conservative/christian/real Americans have "values". and nobody else does. We decide who to deride.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
27. Nah...there a few of us round kicking and screaming after 30+ years.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 02:45 PM
Aug 2012

absolutes are annoying and dilute an argument
imho.

marble falls

(57,083 posts)
29. I truly wish that those against same sex marriage realize that same sex marriage doesn't amend....
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 07:07 PM
Aug 2012

any body's rights and it doesn't cost anybody else anything.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
30. I'd bet many religious conservatives would use these same examples in their argument
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 07:24 PM
Aug 2012

Against marriage equality. Many probably believe that the push for same-sex marriage is another symptom of the decline of the institution of marriage and 'traditional family values' that these examples are also evidence of. They connect all of this with porn, T and A on tv, promiscuity, and birth control as symptoms of the left's promotion of homosexuality, secularism, permissiveness, and their encouragement of the abdication of personal responsibility.

To them, all of this stuff comes from the same source.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's get this straight ....