Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,720 posts)
Mon Jun 25, 2018, 04:08 PM Jun 2018

It is now official from the woman "Hucklebee" that stands at a podium and LIES:

Saying that basically there is no 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th amendment, that when someone comers into this country and tries to step foot in this country, that is a "REFUGEE" seeking asylum..........your are fucked and "DO NOT DESERVE DUE PROCESS".

And the media is all a twitter that we ( liberals/ progressive/democratic party have to take high road when they go low, FUCK THAT) about her and others of her ilk getting called out for what they fucking are..................Lying POS fascist.

Because her fucking boss is complete deranged fucking asshole , it was good for him to have due process when he was bilking people out of money, it was fine with him to get his wife's mother and father a green card, It was fine with him to get due process when he filed for umpteen times in bankruptcy, instead of going to a debtor prison, that he now endorses,m and its just fine with him that he bilks the taxpayers when he goes and plays golf, and his fucking kids are scamming the public trough...................FUCK HIM

And a fucking "republican" congress............standing with there hands in there pocket and just playing with themselves




November 2018 cannot get here fast enough......................

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It is now official from the woman "Hucklebee" that stands at a podium and LIES: (Original Post) turbinetree Jun 2018 OP
SHS is a true believer lunatica Jun 2018 #1
This has been argued before and the courts have John Fante Jun 2018 #2
Proves they are racists treestar Jun 2018 #3
She and her boss need to sit their fat asses down and read a few Supreme Court cases. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2018 #4
Reading like that is above their pay grade Blue_Adept Jun 2018 #5

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
1. SHS is a true believer
Mon Jun 25, 2018, 04:13 PM
Jun 2018

A Stepford White House Press Secretary. Her lines have been programmed into her software and she repeats them in a perfect machine gun cadence.

John Fante

(3,479 posts)
2. This has been argued before and the courts have
Mon Jun 25, 2018, 04:14 PM
Jun 2018

told the xenophobes to fuck themselves every time.

nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,867 posts)
4. She and her boss need to sit their fat asses down and read a few Supreme Court cases.
Mon Jun 25, 2018, 04:22 PM
Jun 2018

For example, Zadvydas v. Davis, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZO.html

But once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the Due Process Clause applies to all “persons” within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence here is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent. See Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 210 (1982); Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 77 (1976); Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U.S. 590, 596—598, and n. 5 (1953); Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 369 (1886); cf. Mezei, supra, at 212 (“[A]liens who have once passed through our gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness encompassed in due process of law”). Indeed, this Court has held that the Due Process Clause protects an alien subject to a final order of deportation, see Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228, 238 (1896), though the nature of that protection may vary depending upon status and circumstance, see Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21, 32—34 (1982); Johnson, supra, at 770.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It is now official from t...