General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWalgreens pharmacist denies mother miscarriage medicine because of moral objection (AZ)
But doctors gave the 35-year-old mother heartbreaking news during her 10-week pregnancy checkup.
The baby's development had stopped. There was no heartbeat. The pregnancy would end with a miscarriage a pain Arteaga has faced before.
Grieving, Arteaga went to her local Walgreens in Peoria on Thursday to pick up medication prescribed by a doctor to manage her health and the miscarriage by terminating the pregnancy.
Instead, Arteaga was turned away, without the medicine she needed.
A Walgreens pharmacist refused to fill the prescription, she said.
I don't have control over my body and I dont have control of the situation," Arteaga said. "I was seeking help for the medication I needed and he refused.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/peoria/2018/06/23/z-arizona-walgreens-pharmacist-denied-mother-miscarriage-medicine-because-personal-beliefs/727805002
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)I actually don't mind too much about bakers refusing to bake wedding cakes for same-sex couples. I'd pick a Democratic plumber over a MAGA one, etc etc.
But a pharmacist has a license and has moral and legal obligations to fulfill. If he doesn't like it, he is free to give up his license, not to make a patient go without medicine that was prescribed for her.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)If they agree with the pharmacist, they should close their doors.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
Walgreens prices are kind of on the high side anyway.
You'll do better at most supermarket or other chain pharmacies anyway. Once you leave, never go back!
.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)But if theyre born, we all know that they wouldnt give a shit about the babies.
treestar
(82,383 posts)If the fetus has died, it's not ending a life. Now they don't want any miscarriage to take place with any help?
I would think they were against inducing birth too (when baby hasn't come after 9 months).
kag
(4,079 posts)First, let me tell you, I know from experience. I have a condition that caused me to have seven miscarriages sprinkled before, between, and after my two children were born. My docs and I had long conversations about what was happening, the medical information, and the politics surrounding it.
So, the reason the bible thumpers will give is that there is no way to tell for "absolute certain" that the fetus is no longer alive. If they can't find a heartbeat, maybe it's just weak or "hiding" or something. If the baby isn't growing, perhaps it is "just" a defect or the date of conception is off, or something.
Now, these arguments are, for all intents and purposes, bullshit with today's technology and medicine, but that doesn't keep the fetus freaks from using it.
Any woman who makes the decision to allow the miscarriage to happen "naturally" risks a bloody, painful mess at home along with infection or...worse. Any woman who gets assistance from her doctor risks having to deal with a world full of sanctimonious shitheads telling her she's being sinful...or worse. I experienced both.
So, yeah, they have an answer for everything, and just don't care if that answer is idiotic. As in all things RWNJ, they never let the facts get in the way of persecuting someone over whom they feel superior.
Kittycow
(2,396 posts)I hope you don't mind a hug.
Thanks for explaining that so that we may have a more clear idea of what's going on and its ramifications. It's so easy to talk in abstracts and not real life..
kag
(4,079 posts)I can talk about it now after years of therapy and healing. Thanks for the kind words. It helps.
Laffy Kat
(16,383 posts)To have a natural miscarriage and ended up hemorrhaging and being taken to two different hospitals by two different ambulances. It was traumatic and I was afraid I would not live to raise the three-year old I already had. I wanted to have a D&C as soon as I knew the fetus was dead, but the NP I saw said it would be healthier for both my body and mind if I let nature take care of it. Right.
Thanks for your insight into this topic.
Second, sorry for your losses...miscarriages are hard, had three myself and a full-term stillbirth.
kag
(4,079 posts)My mom, who was dealing with the same issues I did, had a full-term stillbirth. Back then no one knew about this condition (it's a chromosome translocation). In fact, once I was diagnosed, we learned that my brother has the same thing, and my SIL wound up having even more miscarriages than I did.
They are truly reprehensible. And nothing like it ever happened to them, which of course, is what it takes for them to get a clue. Always willing to have someone else suffer.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)I had 2 natural miscarriages, and 2 that had to be removed surgically. With one, I was at 11 weeks when they found no heartbeat, but the gyno queried whether perhaps the conception date was off and maybe that was why there was no heartbeat. I had to remind her that I had been at her office a month prior with a confirmed pregnancy of 7 weeks, so obviously the date was not off. So we scheduled surgery (D&C, or scraping of the uterus to remove the dead pregnancy) for the next day. I still ended up starting to bleed the pregnancy out that same afternoon, prior to the scheduled D&C, and ended up in the ER with terrible hemorrhaging which ended up in emergency surgery in the middle of the night. All I could think of that long night was how much I wanted to go home to my then 18 month old daughter and husband. At that point all I wanted was for the dead pregnancy to get OUT.
pandr32
(11,594 posts)They carry the item...right?
sarah FAILIN
(2,857 posts)In this case he sent the prescription to a nearby Walgreens pharmacy which let's him think his hands are clean and the company allows. Myself, I would have sold it to her.
What he should have done if he was so set against selling it is to tell her he didn't have it in stock but the store around the corner does and they are getting it ready for her to pick up right now. He didn't have to be an ass.
We have 2 Walgreens pharmacies inside of a mile of each other. I guess this is why.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)The reason he didnt do that is because its not about an actual, genuine belief but a need to assert and show off his moral superiority.
sarah FAILIN
(2,857 posts)Assholes are gonna be assholes.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Employees are required to refer the prescription to another pharmacist or manager to ensure the needs of the patient are met "in a timely manner."
Arteaga explained that there were other pharmacists at the Walgreens when the man denied filling her prescription, yet he did not refer her medical needs to another employee.
"We are looking into the matter to ensure that our patients' needs are handled properly," the statement said.
A representative for Walgreens said someone reached out to Arteaga to apologize for how the situation was handled.
pandr32
(11,594 posts)What I don't understand is why they hire pharmacists who might "have a moral objection" to products carried in their store, and for which a person has a legal prescription. Perhaps those discriminatory pharmacists should work in their own pharmacies that clearly post their narrow-mindedness at the door, or find another type of job.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)There's quite a bit more info. in the story than I could post in the OP.
pandr32
(11,594 posts)exboyfil
(17,863 posts)You have to be careful because it is an exception to employment at will.
Walgreens should have a policy in place that makes this whole interaction invisible to the customer. Violation of that process should be grounds for dismissal. The pharmacist should never announce that they have a moral objection to fulfilling an order.
"Arizona laws specifically allow pharmacies and pharmacists to refuse to fill a prescription for religious or moral reasons."
I think it is a crappy law.
pandr32
(11,594 posts)herding cats
(19,565 posts)When it reaches the point a woman cannot get medication for a no longer viable fetus, the only alternative is a D&C. Which has far greater risks to her health not to mention is much more expensive.
sinkingfeeling
(51,461 posts)One of the prime reasons I became an atheist is their misplaced moral high horse.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,618 posts)Having had a miscarriage with my first pregnancy and having tried unsuccessfully to conceive again, I can understand her anguish. We're seen as incubators not people by a significant portion of the populous. How humiliating for her to be forced to explain her situation in such a public setting. How awful that she had to go through this. She has my sympathies.
Tucker08087
(621 posts)Each was devastating. I went for an ultrasound to try to find a reason, and the tech read on my medical form: Number of pregnancies:3 Number of live births: 0.
She lowered the paper and asked, in what I can only describe as a matronly, accusatory way, So what happened there? And now youre looking for help getting pregnant? I was already grief-stricken. I said, I miscarried. As far along as 5 months. Again with the accusatory tone which now also carried a dont bother lying because I know you have sinned tone, she said All THREE? She might as well have come right out and said, Liar! Im sure you chose to terminate a few. I replied, Yes, all three, and probably more. I wont take the pregnancy test anymore unless Im two months late. Tears streamed when I said, I just cant stand to know that another of my babies has died. I will say that I saw remorse on this womans face. She sat down on her stool and said, I dont know what to say. Im just so sorry. In that moment, I believed that she meant for the pain I had been through as well as the pain she had caused me. People dont understand the pain that miscarriage causes, more so for some people than others. These people insist that the fetus is a life. Allow the parents the respect and kindness to mourn the death of their child just as if the death occurred after a live birth without imposing ridiculous hurdles, accusations, and shaming.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)The only way to change the attitudes of these ultra-right, ignorant people is for those of us who have trouble carrying babies to tell our stories.
Thanks so much.
kag
(4,079 posts)I posted my own story upthread, and know the kind of looks and comments you talk about. And you're right--people don't understand the grief and loss a woman suffers when she loses a hoped-for pregnancy.
Thinking warm thoughts for you, and for the woman in the news story.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Medical personnel should not be in the business of passing judgement. They are there to provide healthcare, period. I hope all went well with your last pregnancy.
BTW, Welcome to DU!
Tucker08087
(621 posts)I adopted a baby who has grown into an amazing, brilliant, unique, funny (I could go on...) 15 year old young man. The pain fades in my memory when I think that this is the road that brought me to him. I hear the pain of childbirth also fades due to love for the child. In both cases, the pain is worth it!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)My best to you and your son!
MustLoveBeagles
(11,618 posts)She should have kept her judgments to herself, but at least she had the ability to feel shame for what she had done to you. Most these days wouldn't have. People just don't what it's like unless they've experienced it themselves. Mine happened at home with no medical intervention. I wouldn't go to the hospital fearing we'd get a huge bill later that we couldn't pay. My future husband and I had just moved in together and our finances were precarious. He took care of me over the next several days. I missed two days of work. I've been to a fertility specialist recently that can help us and I was fortunate that the staff was kind to me. My husband is nervous about us going through this because our ages.
On a happier note welcome to DU.
Tucker08087
(621 posts)I went through 15 years of fertility treatments and miscarriages. As I posted above, I ended up adopting. If you ever want to talk about the treatments or the possibility of adoption, or just need to talk, please let me know. The good news is, if you have insurance, many fertility treatments are covered now. They were not when I was trying. In fact, my maternity leave of absence request was also denied because (and Im quoting because it still burns a whole in my heart) You didnt do anything. Most businesses and insurance policies now consider the birth of a newborn sufficient to grant leave.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,618 posts)Tucker08087
(621 posts)More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)No more Walgreens for me.
not fooled
(5,801 posts)me too.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Pharmacists can't take it upon themselves to decide whether or not to sell birth control, opioids (unless abuse is suspected), viagra, or whatever else they may object to. Walgreens is in the business of filling prescriptions. The pharmacist will likely be disciplined or fired.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,436 posts)RockRaven
(14,974 posts)that you will perform your duties without reference to your personal moral standards, or you don't get licensed (maybe they do already, but this story is here so I guess not). If your objections are based on science, safety, professional judgement, experience? Okay, then don't dispense it immediately, call the prescribing doctor/PA/NP and talk it out. But moral objections? Bye-bye license.
Look, pharmacists do need to exercise judgment and not just be automatons -- that's another layer of the safety-net of how prescribing mistakes, potential drug interactions, and unnecessary cost-overruns get caught and patients avoid harm (both physical and financial). But your moral objections are irrelevant to your duty to the patients (aka customers) and if you have any interfering ones then you should work in a different field.
This refusal is potentially harmful to this woman, with absolutely no effect on the FACT that this fetus will never progress to anything other than a miscarriage. THIS IS MALPRACTICE.
MagickMuffin
(15,944 posts)I know it is a hassle but these hospital pharmacies are not going to deny someone their medication.
I hope Walgreen's HQ's sets a new policy and if the pharmacist can't uphold that policy then show them the door.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)Company policy cannot override that.
Only removing conscience laws will stop this.
maxrandb
(15,336 posts)didn't fight against this fucked up law hard enough.
I'm through giving companies a pass for this shitshow.
I want to see their political donations. If they gave a fucking penny to ANY God damned Retrumplican, they are complicit.
bluestarone
(16,980 posts)They COULD FIRE this one, i feel!!
mountain grammy
(26,626 posts)and above that if necessary. This man needs to be relieved of the job he's refused to do.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)After they terminate him for actions that are protected by state law.
They are in an impossible position.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)He didnt follow policy - he was required to refer her and did not.
rustysgurl
(1,040 posts)... that if a pharmacist would not fill a birth control or similar medication due to 'religious beliefs or personal convictions', then another pharmacist was supposed to step in and fill it. Or, if another pharmacist was not available, then that prescription should be transferred to another Walgreens where it would be filled.
My daughter was a senior pharm tech for them for almost 10 years. This was their policy as late as 2017.
More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)If he wants, he can open his private pharmacy that serves only people that think like him.
ailsagirl
(22,897 posts)I remember it was a CVS and it was somewhere in the midwest
I was flabbergasted!!!!!
This was when W was president, BTW-- don't remember the year
CountAllVotes
(20,876 posts)They are just as evil as Walgreens!
They manipulated an RX I had. Before I picked it up, I noticed that half of the 90-day supply was not there!
I contacted my health care provider and she looked up the RX and instructed me that I was to never get an RX filled at CVS again as they were guilty of manipulating an RX and to go elsewhere.
So, now I go elsewhere and I also must pay a higher costs because the "new" pharmacy is not in the RX provider's "network". This trickle down sh*t isn't trickling down is it?
RE: the RX being filled = a "controlled" substance. Need I say more?
As for the woman in the story referenced, can she not file a complaint or sue the sh*t out of Walgreens dare one suggest?
ailsagirl
(22,897 posts)Response to ailsagirl (Reply #57)
CountAllVotes This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)Arizona law specifically allows pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions that violate their conscience. Company policy cannot override that.
Walgreen's is in a no win situation: they'll lose business over this but if they were to terminate him they'll be paying out a ginormous settlement.
Laffy Kat
(16,383 posts)Why would there be an objection? This one needs to go to court to get sorted out, and I hope the company gets hit with punitive damages.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)has been very friendly to "Religious Liberty" claims as of late and Walgreen's defense to a lawsuit would likely be something along the line how they have to abide by the conscience laws of Arizona.
While a jury may, in fact, award damages I see a higher court tossing the judgement on appeal.
NutmegYankee
(16,200 posts)That part of company policy is not banned by law.
caballojm
(272 posts)Not anymore. I've been meaning to make the switch to Costco anyway.
StarryNite
(9,447 posts)Let them know that you are switching to a different pharmacy unrelated to Walgreen's. Don't tell them you were planning on switching before. They need to know their bullshit policy is going to cost them customers.
ecstatic
(32,712 posts)no prescription required Plan B a few years ago. That was before it was fully OTC. Went to the drive through and the woman working said I'd have to come in the store to verify my identity or some crap--can't remember the exact excuse given. It was freezing outside and I wasn't dressed appropriately. SMH. I don't go to Walgreens for anything these days.
pansypoo53219
(20,981 posts)get the red out
(13,467 posts)There is one at the University where I work, every time I hear of them I want to puke thinking about their primary purpose probably being learning how to harm women as much as they can upon graduation. "Christian" medical student associations can't possibly be about giving poor, marginalized Christians a group to call their own, in my red state 90% of students are probably Christian!
maxrandb
(15,336 posts)It's their warped view of Christianity.
Bettie
(16,111 posts)you should be in another field.
A pharmacist's job is to dispense medications. That is the job, literally, that is THE JOB.
Assohole made a very bad day even worse for this poor woman.
If your job is to bake cakes, you bake cakes, if your job is to fix cars, you fix them, and if your job is to fill prescriptions, then fill them.
Or get another job.
mainer
(12,022 posts)But women have to be made to suffer.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)on the morale grounds, that a person who will be probably be replaced by a machine in a few years is practicing without a license. They need us more then we need them.
Freddie
(9,268 posts)This also happened a few years ago and the pharmacist was not disciplined. I have not set foot in one since. Make it very public why you are transferring your prescription. Money talks when nothing else does.
dlk
(11,570 posts)A little-known fact in this matter that is rarely discussed. Women will not become full citizens until they can control their own bodies without political interference. Until then, their rights are second-class or less.
demigoddess
(6,641 posts)I had two miscarriages because of what they used to call a tipped uterus. A doctor, seeing this in my records, yelled at me for having 'abortions' which he was against and were illegal back then. The idiot doctor couldn't tell the difference between a miscarriage and a surgical abortion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would say write directly to the president of the company. I have done that in the past and got results. Wrote to the head of the AMA and the president of Sears and got some action. Could not find the name and address of president of Walgreens. Maybe someone else can find it and post.
gtar100
(4,192 posts)Is there a world out there where this shit doesn't go on? This world has an infection and it's symptoms include self-righteous right-wing conservative bullshit. And these assholes love to be in positions of control.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)Are getting alot of crap, and having difficulty getting their scripts filled as well.
The morality police are everywhere.
GaYellowDawg
(4,447 posts)I was on a large dose of oxycodone earlier this year. People treated me as if I was an addict. The ironic thing is that it only partially reduced the pain, and I never got a high from it. When I found something else that almost completely killed the pain (antihistamines, it was an allergic reaction), I got off the oxycodone in about 3 weeks of tapering down. I am very lucky that I was able to do that.
3catwoman3
(24,007 posts)Judgmental busybody. None of his business.
IMO, the ONLY opinion ANY man has ANY right to about ANY pregnancy is one that he helped create and one in which he intends to remain fully involved until the time the child of such pregnancy is a self-supporting young adult. Otherwise, butt the hell OUT!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)Any woman should be able to abort their pregnancy with zero resistance from anyone.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Imagine...people using their jobs and position to deny others the right to purchase legal and necessary products.
WHAT IS THIS, NAZI GERMANY???
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)needs to be fired. He's losing money for them so they may listen.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)It was the most crushing moment in both of our lives, and remains so to this day. After receiving this news (no heartbeat could be heard, ultrasound confirmed fetal death after 37 weeks) my wife received a prescription to induce labor and end this horrible ordeal, so that healing could begin. Our son was stillborn, we named him Andrew, held him for a while, and then said our goodbyes. Two years after that we welcomed our first of three healthy daughters.
I cannot imagine- LITERALLY cannot imagine- what it would have been like to have some pharmacist refuse to fill that prescription. My wife would have been forced to live in that hell for as long as it took for her to go into labor naturally. I can't even imagine, and I pray none of our girls is ever in a position like this. My heart goes out to Ms. Arteaga, and suffice to say I will NEVER use Walgreens pharmacy again. Thankfully I have several other local options.
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)may interact badly with a drug the customer/patient is already taking - and then the pharmacist should call the doctor to let express the concerns. Other than those situations, a pharmacist has no business questioning what or why a doctor has written a prescription.