Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSuspicious claim: Did Cambridge Analytica Have the Hacked Emails?
https://politicalwire.com/2018/06/21/did-cambridge-analytica-have-the-hacked-emails/"SNIP.......
Paul Wood, writing for The Spectator:
An American lawyer I know told me that he was approached by a Cambridge Analytica employee after the election. They had had the Clinton emails more than a month before they were published by WikiLeaks: What should I do? Take this to Mueller, the lawyer replied.
......SNIP"
After the election implies within a few months after November 2016. But Mueller was not hired to investigate till May of 2017.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 814 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Suspicious claim: Did Cambridge Analytica Have the Hacked Emails? (Original Post)
applegrove
Jun 2018
OP
And it was a story in the American Spectator. So I'm wondering if it is a red herring.
applegrove
Jun 2018
#2
To me it has the emotional resonance of within a few months. I could be wrong.
applegrove
Jun 2018
#4
manor321
(3,344 posts)1. Needs verification
It's true this is basically a rumor at this point and needs verification. I don't see American media running with it.
But "After the election implies within a few months after November 2016" is just flatly not true.
applegrove
(118,778 posts)2. And it was a story in the American Spectator. So I'm wondering if it is a red herring.
unblock
(52,317 posts)3. After implies after, not before.
How is 6 months after the election somehow not included in "after the election"?
applegrove
(118,778 posts)4. To me it has the emotional resonance of within a few months. I could be wrong.
It was the American Spectator. I say we tread carefully.