General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumspandr32
(11,594 posts)I'm quite sure there will be little doubt once Mueller finishes his work.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)But not because the Rump installed him. He must be impeached for offenses he has committed.
bucolic_frolic
(43,202 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)And it would need to be for something he did on his own, not because he was installed by Russian agents.
In saying that, I do believe there need to be some rule changes, starting with how hearings cannot be delayed for a year.
bucolic_frolic
(43,202 posts)To say we cannot find a way to undo the unjust is to give up. If the truth is ever laid bare for all to see, possibilities could improve. Theft is theft. Theft is a violation of property rights, in this case voting rights. Someday we will have this discussion as a nation.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)But at the moment, we are bound by the laws that are in place. If we had a 2/3 majority in Congress, then we could do something more.
pandr32
(11,594 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)We have many to thank, starting with those not supporting/voting because the "lesser of 2 evils"
triron
(22,007 posts)malaise
(269,072 posts)for Scalia - do you remember what the turtle and other ReTHUGs did?
oasis
(49,393 posts)a host of other haughty "know it alls".
grantcart
(53,061 posts)hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)If it's been covered here before, I apologize for not seeing it.
stuffmatters
(2,574 posts)And Trump has followed the tradition with an almost entirely Mission Hostile/Unqualified Cabinet....DeVos, Carson, Pruitt, Zinke, Ross etc
Gorsuch is Trump's SCOTUS wrecking ball.
Neil has been brainwashed in same Birch/Kochism since birth. Plus he apparently has her same arrogant, condescending personality: Reportedly most of the other SCOTUS justices find Neil Gorsuch 's opinions pedantic and his presence obnoxious.
dhol82
(9,353 posts)Even for McConnel this seems like a stretch for a SC pick.
Wonder who approved him?
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)orangecrush
(19,581 posts)appearing in teeny tiny print?
(not the header, but the text.)
Doesn't seem to be happening on other threads.
Perhaps just on my device?
dhol82
(9,353 posts)Not sure why you have a problem.
orangecrush
(19,581 posts)after leaving and returning.
Weird!
dhol82
(9,353 posts)Solves virtually any problem.
orangecrush
(19,581 posts)Raysawesome34
(19 posts)To get thier guy confirmed we wouldn't be in this situation.
Our side laid down on the job when those asshole Republicans wouldn't even give Obama's pick a meeting.
There's enough blame to go around on this one.
Sorry. Not sorry.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)They had absolutely no power, but I guess they were supposed to do what?! Throw a bigger temper tantrum?
Raysawesome34
(19 posts)The hugest fucking temper tantrum evah!
It's the SC for fucks sake!
Do you expect the notorious RBG to live to 150?!
Love her to pieces but that ain't happening.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)What could we have done to prevent it from happening?
You seem to have an answer that our most experienced leaders lacked.
Please enlighten us on what could have been done to prevent the Atrocity from happening?
sinkingfeeling
(51,461 posts)Raysawesome34
(19 posts)The fact that I just found this place?
I stated an opinion that maybe we need to toughen up as a party.
So you disagree? Why?
SC appointments are pretty fucking important.
I would like to think we would treat them as such.
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)The blame is wholly owned by McConnell and the GOP majority.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)And this can keep happening as long as people can't be bothered to vote, all it takes is one election for a generation's worth of damage.
Voter turnout at 20-year low in 2016
https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/politics/popular-vote-turnout-2016/index.html
As a nation we take our democracy for granted and got exactly what we deserve.
dhol82
(9,353 posts)I kept screaming to anyone who would listen that the Supreme Court was at risk.
And see what happened?
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)our destiny is in the hands of people who are too lazy to vote.
Which is pretty much the case, it's the only reason Republicans have control right now.
dhol82
(9,353 posts)They had no thoughts about anything else.
Supreme Court, any future control of Congress - no problem.
We wont have Hillary to hate.
Pathetic. All of it.
c-rational
(2,594 posts)hear that from any credible news source.
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)First, here's the decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1432_7j8b.pdf
Minnesota statute 524.2-804 says: if you designated your spouse as the beneficiary of your life insurance policy and the two of you get divorced, that designation is nullified. (It also says you can voluntarily designate your ex as your beneficiary, and the procedure is not difficult.)
Mark Sveen married Kaye Melin in 1997. In 1998, Mr. Sveen bought a life insurance policy. The now-Mrs. Sveen was named as primary beneficiary and his two kids from a previous marriage were contingent beneficiaries. In 2007, the Sveens got divorced and Mr. Sveen died in 2011.
Ms. Melin argues that because the law hadn't been passed yet when the policy was purchased the Contracts Clause of the Constitution nullifies the law. All the justices who weren't nominated by our illegitimate president agreed that's not the way it works.
Gorsuch believes the Contracts Clause is absolute - any law that impairs a contract must be considered unconstitutional.
The problem with Gorsuch's stance is it effectively nullifies every law in existence.
Fun and easy - but extreme - example: I am a shopkeeper in Wall, South Dakota. I wish to sell marijuana to the public. I travel to Colorado and execute a contract with a cannabis farmer for ten tons of bulk cannabis flower per month to be delivered by a date certain. There are a vast number of laws I'd have to violate to enter into this business. Under the Gorsuch Doctrine, I could walk into court waving a copy of the contract and claim the drug laws of Wyoming, South Dakota and the federal government impair my contract with the pot farmer, and all those laws would be instantly erased.
Seriously though, any law on the books impairs someone's contract. Fortunately, the other eight justices didn't see things Gorsuch's way.