There's actually lots of evidence of Trump-Russia collusion
https://www.vox.com/2018/6/11/17438386/trump-russia-collusion
Theres actually lots of evidence of Trump-Russia collusion
The untenability of the no collusion talking point.
By Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesiasmatt@vox.com Jun 11, 2018, 8:00am EDT
snip//
The collusion in plain sight
Last but by no means least, its worth recalling that theres something fundamentally odd about the entire framing of the collusion question.
The way a political candidates relationship to a hostile foreign power would normally be framed is that the discovery of covert collusion would be used as evidence that the candidate harbored a secret desire to repay the foreign power. But in Trumps case, there was absolutely no secret! Trump quite openly ran on a pro-Russia platform, adopting Russian views on the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine, defending Putins character, and vowing to break up the NATO alliance.
Its of course not illegal for a candidate for office to espouse pro-Russian foreign policy views. But
to an extent, there was plenty of collusion in plain view throughout 2016 crimes were committed and Trump openly praised them; he offered pro-Russia policy in exchange for Russian assistance, received the assistance that he sought, and has labored ever since to avoid investigating or punishing Russias crimes.
And here, ultimately, is where Paul Ryans argument completely falls apart.
The speaker says theres no evidence of collusion but also isnt willing to go full Trump, denounce the investigation as a fraud, and call for its end. Instead, he says, this is about Russia and what they did and making sure they dont do it again. But Trump has always been clear that he doesnt think Russia did anything wrong, doesnt want the full details to become known, doesnt want anyone punished, and has no particular interest in making sure they dont do it again. And that, itself, is perhaps the most powerful evidence of collusion.