General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking - Wiretap onCohen weeks before FBI raid - Update per NBC - Phones monitored - no wiretap
Last edited Thu May 3, 2018, 07:26 PM - Edit history (1)
WH involved - Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
They are going down
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)Praise the lordy !!
malaise
(269,054 posts)M$NBComcast now. Evidence of a crime. Holy Shit this is coming to a head.
trueblue2007
(17,228 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)ACKLY!!!!
👍👍🤪🤸🏻?♀️
Hekate
(90,714 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)This was about to break
Zoonart
(11,869 posts)hence the "Hands off Vonkers" panic.
malaise
(269,054 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,564 posts)Oh my my, oh hell yes. Go put on your party dress.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)hlthe2b
(102,292 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)It will have to be, to store all the evidence that Special Counsel has amassed against these treason weasels!
Orsino
(37,428 posts)volstork
(5,402 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)LSFL
(1,109 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)serving up crime - then atty-client privilege is out the window....and the atty knows it is a crime..or the client knows it is a crime, right???
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)If they are conspiring to commit a crime, it's not priveleged. If it's a theoretical discussion, like "Is this a crime?" then it's privileged. Smart criminals keep it "theoretical." Dumb ones, well, we are talking about Trump here, so...
LakeArenal
(28,820 posts)janx
(24,128 posts)How so? I can't keep up with all of this!
emulatorloo
(44,131 posts)intercepted.
Getting link
https://upload.democraticunderground.com/100210571976
janx
(24,128 posts)Might have to turn on the XM radio.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,742 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)sprinkleeninow
(20,250 posts)That dammm microwave.
Microwaves just cannot be trusted.
😂😆🤣
~sprink
💙🇺🇸🌊
emulatorloo
(44,131 posts)A fact
I wondered if he knew, but I shouldn't have.
Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)12:06 PM - May 3, 2018
Link to tweet
?s=20
emulatorloo
(44,131 posts)hatrack
(59,587 posts)janx
(24,128 posts)spanone
(135,844 posts)janx
(24,128 posts)MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Link to tweet
Saviolo
(3,282 posts)There are a few people tweeting about that:
Link to tweet
janx
(24,128 posts)dweller
(23,641 posts)a secure line or a burner?
I hope it's tapped 😜
rtracey
(2,062 posts)oh ummmmm, hahahhaa well, I ahhahaa you see, there was this guy ummmm BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, EMAILS CROOKED HILLARY
IVANKA, MELANIA HELP!!!!!
mobeau69
(11,145 posts)Capperdan
(492 posts)Please get this scum out of OUR HOUSE!
janx
(24,128 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)Listen to any, or use any, privileged information a listener could glean from a conversation.
The chances Trump was on that call is ridiculously small, and the chance he would discuss incriminating information without 100% knowing who was on the line is infinitesimally smaller.
They probably heard a conversation between Cohen and Dowd, Cobb or McGahn relating to document possession and submission. Since that would be Trumps legal team discussing legal strategy, that call would be covered by attorney-client privilege.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)atreides1
(16,079 posts)He's arrogant, Dowd and Cobb left, it's been reported that he and McGahn aren't exactly on cordial term...and Ghouliani dropped the soap on Hannity!!!
So it's very likely that Trump talked to Cohen without his legal "team" even knowing about it...and only the FBI knows what was discussed...and investigators along with the court will decide if the conversation was privileged!
Saviolo
(3,282 posts)... and keep in mind, this is just what people with more knowledge of the process than I have been saying in a theoretical sort of way, is that the call discussed not possession and submission of documents, but destruction of them. That discussion would not be covered by a-c privilege as it is discussion about committing a crime.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)mcar
(42,334 posts)I usually don't tune in till 5. But this is too delicious.
cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)Thanks!
You suppose the tap created the legal basis for the raid? Which means they already had and have the goods???!!
OH HAPPY DAY!!!!!
OnDoutside
(19,962 posts)oasis
(49,389 posts)and HE can be connected to Trump. Oh my!
grantcart
(53,061 posts)janx
(24,128 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)No attorney client privilege. They can listen to anyone.
ffr
(22,670 posts)Me neither.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)with his Oval Office taping system.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)Maybe JFK
FarPoint
(12,409 posts)The day tRump had him come in to kiss his ring... wanting a loyalty oath....
Comey was skeptical, heck suspicious and uncomfortable of tRump...I think the bombshell will be, Comey wore a wire.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)shortly after Cohen's offices were raided that Cohen's phones had been wire-tapped for several months prior?
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)I'm looking forward to him implicating himself and those around him further.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)These guys are fuuuuucked
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)<snip>
CORRECTION: Earlier today, NBC News reported that there was a wiretap on the phones of Michael Cohen, President Trumps longtime personal attorney, citing two separate sources with knowledge of the legal proceedings involving Cohen.
But three senior U.S. officials now dispute that, saying that the monitoring of Cohens phones was limited to a log of calls, known as a pen register, not a wiretap where investigators can actually listen to calls.
NBC News has changed the headline and revised parts of the original article.
Federal investigators have monitored the phone lines of Michael Cohen, the longtime personal lawyer for President Donald Trump who is under investigation for a payment he made to an adult film star who alleged she had an affair with Trump, according to multiple senior officials and individuals with knowledge of the legal proceedings involving Cohen.
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)Three hours is an eternity - it's non-stop breaking news with these goons at the helm
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)out my hwole show to cover what is happening right now?
janx
(24,128 posts)I find this part interesting:
I so wanted tapes from wiretaps
janx
(24,128 posts)I suspect they were not from the DOJ.
triron
(22,007 posts)janx
(24,128 posts)with other information. There is no doubt.
your response really cracks me up.
Historic NY
(37,451 posts)but it does record times, length of call, from and to. If they text message it can trap that also.
raven mad
(4,940 posts)And, lo, there are tapes!!