General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRubio: There's no evidence that the money's been massively poured back into the American worker
The Florida senator thinks that reheating Reaganomics is a dead end
His implication that Republicans have found no good answer to the problems Mr Trump described is irrefutable. The presidents scheme to revive the 1970s economy through protectionism and deregulation is unrealistic, as Mr Rubiowho these days dares not criticise Mr Trumpcannot help but acknowledge. The future is going to happen, he says. I have no problem with bringing back American car-manufacturing facilities, but, whether theyre American robots or Mexican robots, theyre going to be highly automated. Most Republican congressmen meanwhile remain entranced by the limited-government shibboleths he has shaken off, as his fight over the tax bill revealed. Mr Rubios proposal, to double the tax credit to $2,000 per child and pay for it by making a small increase to the corporate rate his party wanted, was decried by some Republicans as socialism. The watered-down version they accepted, as the price of Mr Rubios support for the bill, excluded the poorest families. There is still a lot of thinking on the right that if big corporations are happy, theyre going to take the money theyre saving and reinvest it in American workers, he says. In fact they bought back shares, a few gave out bonuses; theres no evidence whatsoever that the moneys been massively poured back into the American worker.
https://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21741146-florida-senator-thinks-reheating-reaganomics-dead-end-marco-rubio-offers-his
bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)Last time I checked, Rubio voted for the tax cut.
Freethinker65
(10,033 posts)CrispyQ
(36,492 posts)but it's just good business when it goes to the corpos?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)promise that just went bust? No kidding,who would have thought.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)rhetoric for years....he vote YES - for the tax cuts for the rich....how disingenuous - he has been on this afterthought for years....I call BS....
SWBTATTReg
(22,156 posts)even listened to industry experts and the like, you would have discovered via simple discussion w/ all members of the public what was wrong w/ the tax law recently passed and its obvious tailoring to ones' donors...hypocrites, being that all of their stock and everything is in trusts, granting them tax free loans forevermore, never even selling anything (living off massive proceeds), all while being written off somehow/sheltered somehow etc. This is one of the biggest scams pulled on us, the DUers and the taxpayer grunts that basically aren't seeing any results from the passed new tax law. Estate taxes or death taxes are being totally phased out, so this income is sheltered forever, and basically contributes to little economic advancement (money is basically dead, earning little to nothing in funds yearly wise, but long-term wise, massive forever free money at 15% if 1 year or older). Wow.
dawg
(10,624 posts)It's possible that he might actually come around someday.
I used to believe a lot of the same things that "mainstream" Republicans believe. When I was 17.
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...even if they spoke--or voted differently in the past; and no matter who they are. Or if they change their minds again. Because every sane statement, or action, no matter how small, is a victory for reason. Not for liberalism, necessarily; not for agreeing with us. But for making America a country--again--where empirical facts matter. If the GOP can be brought slowly towards accepting empirical reality, we're all the winners. And Rubio--for all his glaring weaknesses--just might be educable.
Gothmog
(145,481 posts)mvd
(65,179 posts)Too little, too late now.