Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
Fri Apr 27, 2018, 11:32 PM Apr 2018

Seth Abramson: Bombshell revelations in new House Intelligence report

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/990040290907119617.html

There are bombshell revelations deeply damaging to Trump in the just-released HPSCI report written by Trump's allies and agents in the House. This thread discusses them via a deep dive into the timeline of events the GOP now seeks to obscure. Hope you'll read and share.

It's now clear that Trump NatSec chief Jeff Sessions received—with Trump—the US intelligence community's August 17, 2016 briefing calling Russia a "threat." 22 days later, Sessions secretly met with the Russian ambassador. No other Armed Services Senator met with Kislyak in 2016.

Sessions' testimony confirms he discussed Ukraine (sanctions) with Kislyak in his secret meeting of September 8, 2016—the one he lied to Congress about. But we didn't know until now that the intelligence community had told him 22 days earlier that Russia was an *active* threat.

So Trump's top national security advisor was told Russia was an *active* threat against the US and *almost immediately thereafter* set up a secret meeting with the Russians, which he later lied about under oath. During the secret meeting he discussed sanctions policy with Russia.

SNIP
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Seth Abramson: Bombshell revelations in new House Intelligence report (Original Post) pnwmom Apr 2018 OP
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Apr 2018 #1
K&R... spanone Apr 2018 #2
K&R Docreed2003 Apr 2018 #3
That was in their report that they claim showed there was no wrongdoing? Doodley Apr 2018 #4
If that is considered OK by them what in the Hell BigmanPigman Apr 2018 #5
Well, the money Scarsdale Apr 2018 #17
They didn't make any attempt to connect the dots. triron Apr 2018 #6
a few cons secretly might have wanted to get something out? the rest are fucking idiots certainot Apr 2018 #9
Think that was bad, this was also in it, even worse grantcart Apr 2018 #11
That's covered in the Abramson tweets. It IS a smoking gun. n/t pnwmom Apr 2018 #15
I continue to be amazed at all that comes out about this maladministration brer cat Apr 2018 #7
Thanks, brer cat. Staying on top of it is my way of coping pnwmom Apr 2018 #8
Maybe that's why he keeps tweeting "Witch hunt!" and "No collusion!" DesertRat Apr 2018 #10
Doesn't matter. Trump is king of their world. We are the dandruff. SleeplessinSoCal Apr 2018 #12
Have you been paying attention to events impacting Trump & Co the last two weeks? lunatica Apr 2018 #23
The republican Perjurer General is a traitor against America Achilleaze Apr 2018 #13
Is this possibly the core reason Sessions recused himself ? Pluvious Apr 2018 #14
I believe that the DOJ ethics officer was absolutely going to recommend grantcart Apr 2018 #16
Nunes is so stupid he doesn't know the damage he does. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2018 #18
Does anyone else find this vaguely suspicious? BobTheSubgenius Apr 2018 #19
K&R Scurrilous Apr 2018 #20
I like this thread reader thing MariaCSR Apr 2018 #21
Oops... lunatica Apr 2018 #22
K&R red dog 1 Apr 2018 #24
So much for the DUers who kept insisting Trump did not commit treason because we were Nitram Apr 2018 #25
AFAIK Treason requires actual war with troop movements directly against the United States marylandblue Apr 2018 #27
What Is It About August Briefings Me. Apr 2018 #26

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
17. Well, the money
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 03:03 PM
Apr 2018

Russia donated to the gop was more than welcome, so that "greased the skids" so to speak. The entire administration of unqualified traitors, plus the gop needs to resign.

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
9. a few cons secretly might have wanted to get something out? the rest are fucking idiots
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 01:43 AM
Apr 2018

- really, just stupid, capable of being told what to do by their think tank appointed staff and remembering and delivering some lines. that's what the GOP is now.

and R is for russian.........

brer cat

(24,610 posts)
7. I continue to be amazed at all that comes out about this maladministration
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 12:43 AM
Apr 2018

and that the republicans in Congress try to keep hidden.

Thanks for the post, pnwmom. You have been staying on top of this all along.

pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
8. Thanks, brer cat. Staying on top of it is my way of coping
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 01:43 AM
Apr 2018

with the almost unbearable turn of events that took place in 2106.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
23. Have you been paying attention to events impacting Trump & Co the last two weeks?
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 04:02 PM
Apr 2018

What in the world do you mean it doesn’t matter? Everyone around him are trapped and falling like flies!

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
13. The republican Perjurer General is a traitor against America
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 06:25 AM
Apr 2018

for the benefit of the ignoble & deceitful & traitorous republican Comrade Casino*

* aka republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
16. I believe that the DOJ ethics officer was absolutely going to recommend
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 02:08 PM
Apr 2018

Recusal and this would become public. He had no option

BobTheSubgenius

(11,567 posts)
19. Does anyone else find this vaguely suspicious?
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 03:41 PM
Apr 2018

It's almost as if he didn't have the best interests of America or Americans foremost in his mind. Or that it's possible he just might have had an inkling that these actions weren't ...umm...necessarily mainstream, shall we say?

Nitram

(22,890 posts)
25. So much for the DUers who kept insisting Trump did not commit treason because we were
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 05:46 PM
Apr 2018

"not at war with Russia." If Russia had been declared an active threat against the US, that argument falls by the wayside.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
27. AFAIK Treason requires actual war with troop movements directly against the United States
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 06:08 PM
Apr 2018

At least that's what courts have always ruled. Maybe we need a 21st century extension to that, but I think we'd need a constitutional amendment for that. I don't see Mueller trying to muddy his already strong case for other crimes by trying to extend treason to situations far beyond the contemplation of the Constitution.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
26. What Is It About August Briefings
Sat Apr 28, 2018, 06:02 PM
Apr 2018

that Cons think they can just ignore them? Bush/Condi August 6, Comrade Trump/Sessions August 17.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seth Abramson: Bombshell ...