Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,024 posts)
Fri Apr 27, 2018, 09:24 AM Apr 2018

Natalia Veselnitskaya, of Trump Tower meeting fame: "I am an informant" for the Russian government.



MOSCOW — The Russian lawyer who met with Trump campaign officials in Trump Tower in June 2016 on the premise that she would deliver damaging information about Hillary Clinton has long insisted she is a private attorney, not a Kremlin operative trying to meddle in the presidential election.

But newly released emails show that in at least one instance two years earlier, the lawyer, Natalia V. Veselnitskaya, worked hand in glove with Russia’s chief legal office to thwart a Justice Department civil fraud case against a well-connected Russian firm.

Ms. Veselnitskaya also appears to have recanted her earlier denials of Russian government ties. During an interview to be broadcast Friday by NBC News, she acknowledged that she was not merely a private lawyer but a source of information for a top Kremlin official, Yuri Y. Chaika, the prosecutor general.

“I am a lawyer, and I am an informant,” she said. “Since 2013, I have been actively communicating with the office of the Russian prosecutor general.”

The previously undisclosed details about Ms. Veselnitskaya rekindle questions about who she was representing when she met with Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort and others at Trump Tower in Manhattan during the campaign. The meeting, one focus of the special counsel investigation into Russia’s election interference, was organized after an intermediary promised that Ms. Veselnitskaya would deliver documents that would incriminate Mrs. Clinton.


MORE:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/27/us/natalya-veselnitskaya-trump-tower-russian-prosecutor-general.html?smid=pl-share

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Natalia Veselnitskaya, of Trump Tower meeting fame: "I am an informant" for the Russian government. (Original Post) kpete Apr 2018 OP
Trump, "No collusion" Botany Apr 2018 #1
Nope, no collusion dalton99a Apr 2018 #2
Well Trump says that there was "no collusion" Botany Apr 2018 #3
File this under "No shit, Sherlock!" GoCubsGo Apr 2018 #4
But really what about Hillary's emails? Botany Apr 2018 #5

Botany

(70,598 posts)
1. Trump, "No collusion"
Fri Apr 27, 2018, 09:28 AM
Apr 2018

“I am a lawyer, and I am an informant,” she said. “Since 2013, I have been actively
communicating with the office of the Russian prosecutor general.” Natalia Veselnitskaya


https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/10/politics/trump-no-collusion/index.html

Trump: "Well, again John, there has been no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians or Trump and Russians. No collusion. When I watch you interviewing all the people leaving their committees, I mean, the Democrats are all running for office, trying to say this that -- but bottom line, they all say there's no collusion. And there is no collusion.

"And when you talk about interviews, Hillary Clinton had an interview, where she wasn't sworn in, she wasn't given the oath, they didn't take notes, they didn't record and it was done on the 4th of July weekend. That's perhaps ridiculous and a lot of people looked upon that as being a very serious breach and it really was.

"But again I'll speak to attorneys -- I can only say this, there was absolutely no collusion. Everybody knows it. Every committee -- I've been in office now for 11 months. For 11 months, they've had this phony cloud over this administration, over our government. And it has hurt our government. It does hurt our government. It's a Democrat hoax that was brought up as an excuse for losing an election that frankly the Democrats should have won because they have such a tremendous advantage in the electoral college.

"So it was brought up for that reason. But it has been determined that there is no collusion and by virtually everybody. So we'll see what happens. We'll see what happens. I mean certainly we'll see what happens -- when they have no collusion and nobody's found any collusion at any level it seems unlikely that you'd even have an interview."

Botany

(70,598 posts)
3. Well Trump says that there was "no collusion"
Fri Apr 27, 2018, 09:35 AM
Apr 2018

As a matter of fact Trump said it 7 times in 2 minutes .... see post above.

GoCubsGo

(32,095 posts)
4. File this under "No shit, Sherlock!"
Fri Apr 27, 2018, 09:36 AM
Apr 2018

Anyone who has been paying attention has been onto you, Ms. Veselnitskaya.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Natalia Veselnitskaya, of...