Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 08:10 AM Apr 2018

Should we be talking to the dead?

https://qz.com/896207/death-technology-will-allow-grieving-people-to-bring-back-their-loved-ones-from-the-dead-digitally/

Imagine you have a close friend you frequently communicate with via text. One day, they suddenly die. You reel, you cry, you attend their funeral. Then you decide to pick up your phone and send them a message, just like old times.

“I miss you,” you type. A little response bubble appears at the bottom of the screen. “I miss you too,” comes the reply. You keep texting back and forth. It’s just like they never left.

The possibility of digitally interacting with someone from beyond the grave is no longer the stuff of science fiction. The technology to create convincing digital surrogates of the dead is here, and it’s rapidly evolving, with researchers predicting its mainstream viability within a decade. But what about the ethics of bereavement—and the privacy of the deceased? Speaking with a loved one evokes a powerful emotional response. The ability to do so in the wake of their death will inevitably affect the human process of grieving in ways we’re only beginning to explore.

In the past year, neuroscientists and philosophers have been speculating about the potential of, let’s say, building a digital duplicate of your grandmother. This copy could exist in a kind of virtual Elysium, able to Skype in to Thanksgiving dinners long after her death. But Hossein Rahnama of Ryerson University and the MIT Media Lab is working on something more immediately realizable than mental duplicates: chatbots crafted from personal data.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should we be talking to the dead? (Original Post) TreasonousBastard Apr 2018 OP
No. That is all. Kirk Lover Apr 2018 #1
If you buy into the religious fantasy that god communicates with you... brooklynite Apr 2018 #2
Only for laughs Dread Pirate Roberts Apr 2018 #3
Covered in SF for decades in numerous ways Blue_Adept Apr 2018 #4
Only if they know winning lottery numbers dalton99a Apr 2018 #5
Creepy, and no. Thats supporting a delusion. Oneironaut Apr 2018 #6

brooklynite

(94,737 posts)
2. If you buy into the religious fantasy that god communicates with you...
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 08:12 AM
Apr 2018

...buying into the fantasy that your Grandmother does isn't a long stretch.

Blue_Adept

(6,402 posts)
4. Covered in SF for decades in numerous ways
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 08:20 AM
Apr 2018

There is no singular path to how it'll be handled on either end, but there's pros and cons to be sure, just like with any tool.

It was a part in the Captain America: Civil War movie as well

Oneironaut

(5,524 posts)
6. Creepy, and no. Thats supporting a delusion.
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 08:40 AM
Apr 2018

The movie, “AI” had an effect on me. If someone loses a child, for example, would replacing them with a robot that is an exact replica of them be healthy?

I really don’t think so. You’re only trying to solve grief by giving people a delusion to hold on to. It’s all a trick. It’s an unthinking machine with no consciousness or life acting out lines of compiled code.

I don’t think this use of machines is ethical.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should we be talking to t...