General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate allows babies in chamber despite concerns from older, male senators
Progress, in spite of old men who are nervous around icky, diapered babies and nursing women...
The inspiration for the historic change of rules was Sen. Tammy Duckworth's daughter Maile Pearl, born April 9. Duckworth, now the only senator in U.S. history to give birth while in office, wants to resume voting and the Senate requires that votes be cast in person.
..........................................................................
Teleworking is not an option in the Senate, which requires members to vote in-person. So Duckworth raised a rare question that split her colleagues more along generational lines than well-worn partisan ones, according to interviews Wednesday. Duckworth proposed changing the rules to allow senators with newborns not just Duckworth, and not just women to bring their babies onto the floor of the Senate. This, recalls Sen. Amy Klobuchar, did not go entirely smoothly for the two months she privately took questions about the idea and its potential consequences diaper changes, fussing and notably, nursing. More than one senator joked that those things happen on the Senate floor now.
.............................................................................
"Yes, you can vote from the doorway of the cloakroom, but how is she going to get to the cloakroom when it's not wheelchair accessible?" she asked. Some senators proposed making an exception for Duckworth. But her allies said the Senate should make work easier for new parents. "We believe strongly, and she did, that it should be a permanent rules change."
..................................................................................
There was more, voiced privately, Klobuchar said including whether Duckworth intended to change Maile's diaper or nurse her new baby on the Senate floor.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-senate-babies-chamber-duckworth-20180418-story.html
I can see what the older men were really worried about...
Farmer-Rick
(10,185 posts)Excluding children and babies use to be a way to exclude women. Duckworth is an amazing person.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Judging by recent discussions on Duckworth's efforts....
Farmer-Rick
(10,185 posts)But you would expect better from Dems.
Girard442
(6,075 posts)They'll cry, throw tantrums, make messes, be disruptive, and need constant attention.
The babies are just going to have to deal with it.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)tblue37
(65,403 posts)IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)Babies can be super loud and disruptive. It's extremely disturbing having a baby screaming while you are trying to concentrate on something or conduct some important business.
Nothing related to gender or age in my view. More of a matter of decorum.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Really?
She just wanted the ban removed, and it was unanimously approved, even by the old republican men.
Did you read the article?
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)Just don't like the idea of babies screaming while official business is taking place.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)It's not like she's going to be sitting there all day long with the baby. It's for votes.
And you may want to look at babies again as well because they don't scream constantly. They adapt to where they are pretty well for the most part. Watch some of CSPAN with voting periods to see how this actually goes down.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Once again, a blow to American Exceptionalism.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)New Zealand's new baby-friendly Parliament
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/98699747/new-zealands-new-babyfriendly-parliament
gollygee
(22,336 posts)They aren't going to keep screaming babies on the senate floor. Babies can't nurse and scream at the same time. They eat and then they fall asleep.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)That kind of thinking is outdated.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)in the middle of an important proceeding?
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)It's where the Senators convene to vote and interact with each other. They do their actual work in their Senate offices in the Senate office buildings.
The Senate floor is noisy, busy, and bustling. A crying, fussing baby is hardly likely to be noticed. In fact, the baby is more likely to be disturbed by the Senators than vice versa
Response to ehrnst (Original post)
gollygee This message was self-deleted by its author.
zeusdogmom
(994 posts)Are not disruptive. Wise parents leave with a disruptive child until said child is calm. And then return. People get their shorts in a knot over such silly things.
I'm glad the Senate is approaching the 21st century - albeit mighty slowly.
I am, however, weekly amazed at how many people - both men and women - find nursing babies in public offensive. And how difficult it can be to find a spot - any spot - to nurse a child. I battled this nearly 40 years ago when my kids were babies. I though by now we as a society would be a different place.
FWIW - I led church choir rehearsal with a 2 week old nursing babe in arms - and later directed the choir on Sunday mornings holding said baby 'cause she wasn't happy unless she was with momma. No one batted an eyebrow - and this was not a progressive, liberal congregation. But it had a strong focus on healthy families and thus healthy individuals.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)It's called feeding. I bet those who are offended by seeing a woman breastfeeding a child are not offended when they see baby calves sucking a cow's udder.
Sampan
(121 posts)What if they see a nipple?? Those old farts would get the vapors!