Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,720 posts)
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 09:58 AM Apr 2018

At least the NFL isn't pretending it's not blackballing Colin Kaepernick

As if there were any doubt that the NFL was going to continue its blacklist against Colin Kaepernick, the former Super Bowl starting quarterback was once again denied an opportunity this week. This time, it was in Seattle, and there was none of the hemming and hawing about Kaepernick’s numbers not being good enough or his playstyle not being the right fit for the offense. No, instead, an NFL source told ESPN’s Adam Schefter that Seahawks officials cancelled Kaepernick’s workout after he refused to commit to ending his kneeling protests during the national anthem during the 2018 season. (Sure enough, on Friday, the Seahawks went ahead and found someone else for the job.)

This comes just days after Kaepernick’s former teammate, Pro Bowl safety Eric Reid – the first 49ers player to join Kaepernick in his protest in 2016 – was approaching a contract with the Cincinnati Bengals only to be confronted by team owner Mike Brown, who asked him to commit not to kneel during the anthem in 2018. After going through a series of workouts with coaches and sensing interest, Reid was again confronted, this time by Bengals coach Marvin Lewis. Lewis asked Reid if he wished to clarify his stance on anthem kneeling for ownership. Reid declined, and the meeting was over shortly thereafter. Reid, like Kaepernick, remains unsigned.

As Reid tweeted in March, “[General Managers] aren’t the hold up, owners are.” Football people like Bengals defensive coordinator Teryl Austin recognize players like Reid still have something to offer NFL squads. It’s owners like Brown who feel threatened by a powerful voice like Reid’s or a Kaepernick’s in their locker rooms, on their fields, and perhaps most crucially, on their television sets.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/apr/13/kaepernick-reid-blackballed-nfl-kneeling-anthem


And exactly why and how do the public pay(s) for these tax breaks that these owners get to fucking discriminate and have venues built by taxpayers....................this is just fucked up


18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Mopar151

(10,002 posts)
1. Too many fans want to be managers!
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 10:04 AM
Apr 2018

Players are supposed to be greatful pawns, and bow before Massa! They better know their damm role!

 

poboy2

(2,078 posts)
14. This is how THEY are kept in line, so the players should be made to abide those dictates
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:22 PM
Apr 2018

as well. Crabs in a hamper...okay, racist crabs in a hamper.

genxlib

(5,542 posts)
4. This goes beyond the owners
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 10:44 AM
Apr 2018

I would love to think that the owners would do the right thing but the fans are at the root of this. As long as the drooling masses that object to the kneeling are making a stink, the owners are in a no-win situation.

I would love to believe that the objecting fans are an insignificant minority that should not affect decision making. However, I think the riled up fan base is certainly big enough to make an impact. It is one thing for an owner to stand by the existing players they have. Bear in mind that those existing players had a built in level of support among the fans since they were already one of "our guys". But it is another level of trouble to bring someone into the team knowing they are going to be controversial from the beginning. They would have no pre-existing fan support and would be widely jeered from day one.

This is largely akin to driving advertisers away from FOX or Limbaugh. They are business owners and do not want controversy. They don't necessarily object to the specifics of the policy or else they would not have advertised on Limbaugh in the first place. They only flee when a significant enough of their customers say it is unacceptable.

This is so wrong. These guys deserve a job if they still have the talent regardless of exercising their first amendment rights. But it is a larger cultural question that really comes from the fan base.

Permanut

(5,653 posts)
5. Well said, genxlib..
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 10:58 AM
Apr 2018

the NFL is a sacred institution to the fan base, like NASCAR.

Disclaimer: I've been an NFL fan since 1960, but not so much NASCAR. It just isn't very interesting watching 30 cars make left turns all day. That said, the first amendment rights of the players should always have precedence.

Lamonte

(85 posts)
6. Team cohesion
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:12 PM
Apr 2018

I would not hire a player who has his focus on a protest rather than helping the team he is supposed to be helping. A valid protest, but I do not expect the Seahawks or any team to provide the platform.

pazzyanne

(6,558 posts)
7. Question - what are the reasons for making that statement
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:27 PM
Apr 2018

"I would not hire a player who has his focus on a protest rather than helping the team he is supposed to be helping." Enquiring mind wants to know. As a person who has done protests most of her life, those protests have never kept me from doing the job I was hired to do. It is not like the player drops to take a knee in the middle of a play. Taking a knee is a very respectful way to protest IMHO.

cstanleytech

(26,322 posts)
9. That would make sense if they were refusing to play when the time came to start the game itself
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:42 PM
Apr 2018

but they were not doing that.

RVN VET71

(2,698 posts)
11. Do you really think kneeling affects team cohesion?
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:03 PM
Apr 2018

I'm not asking facetiously. Seems to me, if a player on a team cannot concentrate and give his full effort because he doesn't like or agree with a political and moral stand taken by his team-mate, then he's the one who should be given his walking papers.

On the other hand, if an existing team -- maybe the Seahawks -- has reacted with anger about a prospective player's political and moral stance, then maybe that prospective player shouldn't be hired. (Even then, though, I have to think that management might want to show some cojones and tell the players to live with it or take a walk -- as Leo Durocher did with the racist buttheads on the Brooklyn Dodgers who threatened a boycott if Jackie Robinson were signed. Are you listening, Kirby Higby?)

Of course, it's not about team cohesion. It's about filthy rich and corporate fascist owners who do not like the idea of protests on the field because it might affect adversely the racists among their fans. But, I gotta say, Brooklyn kinda sorta got behind Jackie, and Joe Black, and Jim Gilliam, and Roy Campanella, and Don Newcombe, if memory serves.

So, to edit what I just said, it's about narrow minded, fascist racist owners who think their fandom can follow a team only if its players are narcissistic block heads who are totally unaware and unaffected by the world outside of their brain-crunching game. And I have words for those narrow minded, un-American borderline fascist 1%ers who own the teams, but I won't sully the pages of Democratic Underground with them.

spanone

(135,887 posts)
16. I would hire him because of his protest.. someone will step up and hire him for his talent.
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 02:07 PM
Apr 2018

wait and see.

Mr.Bill

(24,330 posts)
8. I would support a team that did not play the national anthem before the game.
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 12:31 PM
Apr 2018

I'm through going to sporting events and being forced into so-called patriotic ceremonies and being forced to worship the police and the military. Just play the game. That's what I came to see.

RVN VET71

(2,698 posts)
13. Agree.
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:07 PM
Apr 2018

The Star Spangled Banner is a hymn that should be reserved for special State occasions. I'd much prefer Woody Guthrie's "This Land is Your Land" to rouse the crowds at mass-entertainment events. It's a joyous song about America and includes no exploding or bursting bombs. It references peace and the natural wonder that (still) is this nation.

rogue emissary

(3,148 posts)
15. If that's true.
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 02:05 PM
Apr 2018

Than why does just about every famous current football player have a charity organization?

A few of the elite players have multiple charities. The league encourages them to be active in their community.

PufPuf23

(8,840 posts)
12. Imagine a team comprised of self selected like minded stars that
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:07 PM
Apr 2018

Goes all the way to win the Super Bowl.

I. was a 49er fan nearly 50 years, a Christopher Milk Club kid while in Cub Scouts sitting in Kezar end zone dodging sea gull shit. Fandom wa Ned with Bartello gone and contributed to suspenDing Satelite dish and no tv since 2011 but do watch stuff on internet.

Persevere and succeed Kap!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At least the NFL isn't pr...