Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,356 posts)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 05:41 PM Jul 2012

WikiLeaks claims responsibility for fake Bill Keller column, citing donation ban

Hoax including fake tweets and a counterfeit Times website dismissed as 'childish prank' by former editor Bill Keller
Ed Pilkington in New York
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 29 July 2012 14.18 EDT

WikiLeaks, the whistleblowing site set up by Julian Assange, has claimed that it was behind the fake opinion piece circulating on the internet under the name of Bill Keller, columnist and former executive editor of the New York Times ...

The organisation implied that it – or its "great supporters", whomsoever they might be – had carried out the stunt in a bid to embarrass the Times into covering the financial blockade of WikiLeaks by US companies ...

That WikiLeaks should have masterminded the hoax – assuming the group is telling the truth – is not entirely surprising. Assange had a falling out with the New York Times, and its then editor Bill Keller, after the paper published a profile of him that he deemed unflattering ...

"My views on WikiLeaks are widely misrepresented," a rather tired (real) Keller said. "This falls ham-handedly in the realm of misrepresentation." ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jul/29/bill-keller-fake-column-wikileaks?newsfeed=true

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. Well, if the goal was to "stick it" to Keller, all they did was make him look victimized by
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 05:49 PM
Jul 2012

mendacious pranksters.

The prank was apparently in the works since March--you'd think they might have thought about how it would go over.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
3. One wonders what the motive was. It certainly does not seem well-thought out.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 06:01 PM
Jul 2012

I wonder if this is what real journalists do....

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
4. Keller, another warmongering tool for the establishment elites.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 06:11 PM
Jul 2012

Cheered us right into Iraq with his sleazy little editorials and NYT/neocon propaganda lies.

He's human filth.

struggle4progress

(118,356 posts)
5. Could be: the whole of the corporate media was guilty of that, IIRC.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 06:23 PM
Jul 2012

But disliking Keller wouldn't predispose me to like Wikileaks' BS

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
6. That's because you have an agenda.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 06:30 PM
Jul 2012

Sadly, your irrational hatred toward Assange has led to bad judgment, that you would lie down with a flea-ridden dog like Keller.

struggle4progress

(118,356 posts)
8. It's actually because I have a tiny bit of experience doing grassroots organizing
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 07:23 PM
Jul 2012

You want to win the PR wars?

Then: stand firmly on the high moral ground; be a reliable source of information; provide informative and useful analyses; and don't play bullshit games

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
7. Genius! Nothing helps Wikileaks more than intentionally disseminating false information.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 06:33 PM
Jul 2012


Now we have an organization that's passing on all sorts of information without saying where or how they got it, and now they are putting it out there that they're not afraid to put out false information to push a specific agenda.

The CIA couldn't have come up with a better way to discredit them if they WANTED TO.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WikiLeaks claims responsi...