General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOkay Mitch! It's time to make your move.
Mitch McConnell has been saying for a long time now that he did not see any need to have a vote to protect the Special Counsel investigation. Because he did not think Donald Trump was that unpredictable or unstable, I suppose?
Well, Mitch, it is time to make your place in history. Since the Senate voiced overwhelming approval to appoint Robert Mueller, in a bi-partisan way, it would be a stab in the back of the Legislature of our Government if you did not defend the stature of the US Senate.
It's a simple proposal. If no crimes were committed, no one will be charged. But we have a duty and a responsibility to go to no end to protect our country from foreign attacks. We should let Bob Mueller finish his job that we approved for him to do.
spanone
(135,838 posts)I hope I'm wrong
kentuck
(111,098 posts)And do something for our country?
Skittles
(153,164 posts)Mitch is knee-deep in the Russia scandal
kentuck
(111,098 posts)TeamPooka
(24,227 posts)kentuck
(111,098 posts)You don't believe in mental telepathy?
TeamPooka
(24,227 posts)kentuck
(111,098 posts)He should not be a US Senator, let alone their Majority Leader.
Volaris
(10,271 posts)The democratic elected party had ever had. He's good at what he does (maintaining his own Power), and the only way to bring him low is to see him either voted out of office, or indicted.
TeamPooka
(24,227 posts)Volaris
(10,271 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)remove indict and arrest Trump. I think Muller has already planned for this. Trump is not interested in just firing Mueller. Trump wanst to completely shut down the administration of justice involving any part of his his crime syndicate. This tells me if Trump fires MUller he'll be out of the WH in 24 hours.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)1. The NYT has reported that Trump wanted to fire Mueller back in December. He didn't, of course, but this is certainly something that he has contemplated and the higher the heat, the more likely it is that he will act.
2. Within the purview of his presidential powers, Trump COULD invalidate the current regulation that permits the establishment of a special counsel. He wouldn't be "firing" Mueller; he would undercut the very rule that created the office in the first place.
Ball is your court, Mitch. Be a good boy. Fetch us some democracy.
kentuck
(111,098 posts)The Senate has a small window of opportunity to fix this problem before it gets out of hand. It is an unnecessary dereliction of duty to put it off even one more day.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)1. Their coffers are awash with illegal Russian money
2. Their security was compromised and every one of them could be blackmailed by the Russians
3. At this point, we've seen more of Punxsutawney Phil this year than Ryan or McConnell
kentuck
(111,098 posts)For various reasons. Number one being that they do not want to lose their power.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)has a little black book on McConnell. I can't imagine they will allow a foreign asset to be at the head of power, with access to the intel we spend billion of dollars to find. Not to mention all of our lives, and our allies lives.
Might have a little sit down with Mitch. He's not clean, and as long playing within political boundaries, it may not have mattered. This is national security, and if he can't see the difference then he's putting himself, his family and bounty in with a Trumps lot. Not a good place to be.
rsdsharp
(9,182 posts)Not as special counsel. As FBI director, yes, but Rosenstein appointed Mueller as special counsel, and there was no Senate vote.
kentuck
(111,098 posts)I edited post to show correction.