Slate: "How to Build a Campaign Finance Case against DT & MC"
This is a few days old--I didn't see it posted previously but apologize in advance if it was. As a non-attorney, I found it very helpful.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/how-to-build-a-campaign-finance-case-against-donald-trump-and-michael-cohen.html
How to Build a Campaign Finance Case Against Donald Trump and Michael Cohen
Lessons from the prosecutions of John Edwards and John Rowland.
By Liam Brennan
snip
"The presidents defenders may take solace in the fact that the Department of Justice failed to convict Edwards. But theres another precedent that Potter didnt mention: the conviction of former Connecticut Gov. John Rowland, which I secured as a federal prosecutor. Taken together, the Edwards and Rowland prosecutions hold important lessons for building a campaign finance case against Trump and his associates...
snip
"...Finally, while the prosecutions main role is to prove up its own story, disproving the defenses theory of the case is almost as important. Defense attorneys must only raise reasonable doubt in one jurors mind to trigger a mistrial, and telling a coherent story can be enough to raise that doubt. From the prosecutions perspective, it appeared self-evident that Mellons payments to Hunter were intended to help Edwards campaign. But the defense argued that payments to conceal Hunter were intended to spare Edwards family, particularly his sick wife, personal embarrassment and shame. The claim apparently had some sway with at least one juror. In Rowlands case, disproving his parallel assertion that Foley was paying him for consulting became vital to the governments efforts.
While Trump may try to follow Edwards lead, the same defense isnt really available to him. Edwards and his wife, Elizabeth, made their partnership a central aspect of his public persona. They had raised four children together, suffered through the death of one of them, and persevered through Elizabeths battles with cancer. Trump, on the other hand, has never been beholden to notions of family values or fidelity. Alleging that the payments to Daniels and McDougal were intended to protect him from personal embarrassment gives the government a free pass to show how he has always been a man without shame."