Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
Mon Apr 9, 2018, 05:57 PM Apr 2018

Question for DU lawyers re. the Cohen thing

If the feds find that all the Stephanie Clifford hush money-related activity was conducted in New York, can they hand the case to the New York State Attorney General so Trump can't pardon Cohen?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Ms. Toad

(34,073 posts)
1. It isn't where the activities took place that matters.
Mon Apr 9, 2018, 05:59 PM
Apr 2018

It is whether the conviction is for state (can't pardon) or federal (can pardon) crimes.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
3. actually where the activities took place can have equal jurisdiction with Federal investigations.
Mon Apr 9, 2018, 06:03 PM
Apr 2018

If actions occur in New York, the State AG can have parallel investigations...but the AG of Connecticut can not...

Ms. Toad

(34,073 posts)
8. I don't even know where to start.
Mon Apr 9, 2018, 06:26 PM
Apr 2018

The only thing that matters, as to Trump's ability to pardon, is whether the crimes are state or federal.

Yes, there are certainly activities that could be covered by both federal and state statutes. But that wasn't the question posed. The question was whether "the case" could just be handed over to the state to avoid Trump being able to pardon him. It does't work that way.

If the activities took place in New York, Connecticut would have no jurisdiction. But again, not the point.

The only thing that matters as to whether Trump can pardon him is whether the activities constituted state v. federal crimes (regardless of where they happened).

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
10. a president can not pardon a state crime conviction are you saying that is not true?
Tue Apr 10, 2018, 07:43 AM
Apr 2018

I like to see where that is authorized because what I know about presidential pardons, it can ONLY go to federal convictions, so enlighten me about this

Ms. Toad

(34,073 posts)
11. Umm....see my very first response in this thread.
Tue Apr 10, 2018, 12:40 PM
Apr 2018

The question was whether the investigation can be handed off to the state if all of the activities took place in New York, in order to avoid Trump being able to pardon him.

The answer is NO. The location of the activities has NOTHING to do with whether Trump can pardon the offense.

You essentially said that location might matter. It doesn't as to the question of pardon. Period. (Location matters as to which court has jurisdiction over the person or the subject matter, but not to whether the offense can be pardoned.)

The ONLY thing that influences whether Trump can pardon the offense is whether the crime is a violation of state law (no pardon - as I believe I've said at least 3 times) or federal law (which can be pardoned). Location of the activities is completely irrelevant as to the question of a pardon.

To avoid the offense being pardoned by Trump, the crimes would need to be a violation of a state law. Any state law. A New York law would do it, as would a Connecticut law. But handing off the investigation of a federal crime to New York officials does not transform a federal crime into a state crime merely because all of the activities took place in New York. Or Connecticut. Or any other state. There must be a state crime that he can be charged with. Not all federal crimes have a state counterpart. (The specific campaign financing laws he is being investigated by, for example, expressly alluded to in the OP may not have a state counterpart.)

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. For the NY AG to do what?
Mon Apr 9, 2018, 06:02 PM
Apr 2018

What New York state law do you suggest was violated?

The payout to Daniels has been known for a long time, and there have been FEC and DOJ complaints on that since January.

What's relatively "new" on the Cohen front is that Felix Sater appears to have begun cooperating.

magicarpet

(14,154 posts)
6. Wouldn't it be nice..... The State of New York slams them...
Mon Apr 9, 2018, 06:15 PM
Apr 2018

... as a continuing criminal operation under the RICO Statutes. Found guilty + long prison term + seize all assets.

_________


U.S. Code › Title 21 › Chapter 13 › Subchapter I › Part D › § 848
21 U.S. Code § 848 - Continuing criminal enterprise

(a) Penalties; forfeitures
Any person who engages in a continuing criminal enterprise shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be less than 20 years and which may be up to life imprisonment, to a fine not to exceed the greater of that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $2,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $5,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, and to the forfeiture prescribed in section 853 of this title; except that if any person engages in such activity after one or more prior convictions of him under this section have become final, he shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be less than 30 years and which may be up to life imprisonment, to a fine not to exceed the greater of twice the amount authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $4,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $10,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, and to the forfeiture prescribed in section 853 of this title.

More at link,
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/848

Cirque du So-What

(25,939 posts)
9. As the cell door slams behind Cheeto Benito...
Mon Apr 9, 2018, 07:26 PM
Apr 2018

he says, 'Guard! I wanna speak to my lawyer,' to which the guard replies, 'that's easy. He's in the next cell.'

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question for DU lawyers r...