General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Corporate Plan to Groom U.S. Kids for Servitude by Wiping Out Public Schools
..................
Lafer explains that in the new system, the children of the wealthy will be taught a broad, rich curriculum in small classes led by experienced teachers. The kind of thing everybody wants for kids. But the majority of Americas children will be consigned to a narrow curriculum delivered in large classes by inexperienced staff or through digital platforms with no teachers at all.
Most kids will be trained for a life that is more circumscribed, less vibrant, and, quite literally, shorter, than what past generations have known. (Research shows that the lifespan gap between haves and have-nots is large and rapidly growing). They will be groomed for insecure service jobs that dull their minds and depress their spirits. In the words of Noam Chomsky, who recently spoke about education to the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET), students will be controlled and disciplined. Most will go to school without developing their creativity or experiencing doing things on their own.
The New Reality: Two Americas, Not One
Economist Peter Temin, former head of MITs economics department and INET grantee, has written a book, The Vanishing Middle Class, which explains how conditions in America are becoming more like a third-world country for the bulk of its people. He agrees with Lafer that the corporate-driven war on public schools is not just about money, but also about a vision of society.
People like Betsy DeVos, he says, are following the thinking of earlier ideologues like James Buchanan, the Tennessee-born, Nobel Prizewinning economist who promoted current antigovernment politics in the 1970s. The shut-the-government-down obsession is really an extreme form of libertarianism, he says, if not anarchism.
Temin also agrees that shrinking the horizons of Americas kids makes sense to people who follow this philosophy. They want to exploit the lower members of the economy, and reducing their expectations makes them easier to manipulate, says Temin. When they arent able to go to college and get decent jobs, they become more susceptible to things like racist ideology.
In other words, dismantling the public schools is all about control.
much more of this terrifying idea here:
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/the-corporate-plan-to-groom-u-s-kids-for-servitude-by-wiping-out-public-schools
ck4829
(35,077 posts)A. It divides the poor white person and the poor black person. Instead of being united, we are fighting each other.
B. It makes us blind, it really does. Here's the root of your "economic anxieties". It's not a black guy taking your job away. Notice those boilerplate job rejection emails? How many have you received that are written in Spanish or say "assalamu alaikum"? Racist ideology makes you fail to see the person owning the workplace or not hiring you is usually a white person, just like you or me.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)It's simply the dismantling of representative government to establish direct rule by the hereditarily wealthy class.
brush
(53,778 posts)It was nice while it lastedthe post-war prosperity boom from the '50s to the '80s when Reagan and the trickle down (not) crowd took over, with a brief flowering during the Clinton '90s when everybody and their mama was working.
I started to write it was a good run but it was really short when you think about itnot even two full generations.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)be far more likely than lords and quasislavery of serfs. This is a whole new world technologically, and the billionaire ultraconservatives behind this would have zero interest in enslaving and caring for people they have no use for.
And fascism is the direction many are clearly trying to take us, often with a veneer of libertarianism because that gives a supposedly high-minded reason to allow unneeded workers to live or die as they can. Personal freedom.
For instance, eliminating government organized health insurance would require people to pay for their own healthcare. Most who work would still get insurance that way, but many could not, such as disabled diabetics and people on dialysis. When sick people ran through their own estates, they would ultimately die from "natural causes."
But we're not going to let that happen, of course. For all that perhaps a third of Americans are naturally disposed to authoritarianism and the evils that requires of them, that is not the case for the rest of us.
Also very important, it's not in our culture or our government of, by and for the people. Very unlike such nations as Germany, Russia and Iran, America has no history of national or state authoritarian government. Our nation was born out of the Enlightenment, a word I'm using more these days as we really need to realize why we are who and what we are and what we need to protect from these barbarians.
Btw, we're going to have to destroy these brand-new ultrawealthy classes and re-redistribute our national wealth to the way it was in healthier days. Or they would destroy us. As we see.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)The poor got whatever education they could afford, if at all, the wealthy got tutors, and higher education at places like Eton.
Even after mandatory schooling was passed, it was again divided by social status and income.
Same model that was so often noted here in the South. "Separate but equal" was not "equal,", school conditions were appalling for non-whites. we still to this day have private schools for well off white families, and poorly funded public schools.
and yes, when you look at what Trump is supporting, it is an attempt to tear down all aspects of our society, for the benefit of the wealthy, like the Kochs, and Mercers.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Already. Remember, Americans are trained from birth to consume. Those sucked into the daily grind vortex think saving money is deprivation but spending more than we have on stuff we don't need is freedom (especially if unnecessary stuff is "on sale".
-Puzzler
malthaussen
(17,195 posts)If authoritarians are threatened by critical thinking and broad educational experience, why would they not control the education of their own children more carefully? Since they don't value these traits, they would not want their own children to waste time with them.
As for suppressing the mob, sure, and this is one way our current authoritarians differ from our founders (even the Puritans), for whom education was fundamental.
Note, though, that the focus on STEM training and removal of all enrichment courses from public education is not confined only to one party. Authoritarians come in all stripes. The drive to turn humans into obedient robots has a long history, and applies to more fields than education.
-- Mal
Shipwack
(2,162 posts)Just critical thinking and education done by -those- kind of people, especially (but not limited to) the working class.
This ties into ehrnsts post about Republicans attacking the NEA:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210467117
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)via private tutors, private schools, and colleges. They pay for it and they control the information and biases.Then these same students, as adults, become political leaders.
Of the forty-four men who have served as President of the United States,
eight have degrees from Harvard, five from Yale, three from Columbia, two from Princeton and one from Penn.
Twelve presidents have earned Ivy undergraduate degrees.
Even IQ45 went to collage..Wharton..tho no record of him actually graduating.
I am reading an excellent book : The Imperial Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War by the guy who wrote Flags of Our Fathers.
the book is about the Asian expansion policies of the US, starting with Teddy Roosevelt. It talks about how the belief
in Aryan purity was endemic in culture, esp. in higher education of the rich. Even Emerson believed it.
thus, having been saturated with that point of view, Teddy, and Congress, who agreed with his views, was all set to take over the
Asia, starting with the Philippines.
Very good read, includes history we were never taught.
Reader Rabbit
(2,624 posts)There are plenty of Democrats promoting charter schools and education reform. It would be awesome if the party took a stance against corporate interference in public education and chose to support teacher professionalism and autonomy. The teacher strikes in (so-called) right-to-work states right now are providing a perfect opportunity to garner teacher support for the next elections.
shanny
(6,709 posts)the rich don't want your kids educated, they want 'em trained. Including, and explicitly, not in critical thinking (like Texas).
Farmer-Rick
(10,175 posts)Their true desires. With less government, the minority of ridiculously rich can come in and control us through their corporations and strongmen. Yes, a system very similar to feudalism.
So, what has happened is capitalism, a feudal style of work environment, has taken over and is destroying democracy.
Capitalism is not compatible with democracy....and democracy has lost, just like Soviet style communism lost to capitalism.
Texin
(2,596 posts)I don't believe that all school districts countrywide are part of this, but certainly a large part of them are, and the curricula promulgated is geared to promote conformity.
Basically, the wealthy donor class of the rethug party want to roll the clock back to the era of the Gilded Age before workers went on the march for broader rights and representation, and long before the era of FDR and his New Deal reforms and institutionalized social safety nets and various agencies of the federal government. And what the current rethugs are doing - or rather not doing - has been bolstered by widespread intellectual torpor reinforced by social behavior largely influenced by electronic social communication platforms; a sort of zombiefication of the American populace - and it begins when children are not yet ready for in-school education, but they are given electronic devices that program them before they can even read.
The ridiculous roll-the-clock back plan can only work so far, though. At some part there's a tipping point. And if they create a permanent serf population and fodder for Bolton's war drums, there will be no one to buy the damn products, goods, services their fucking corporations produce. Their damn companies will collapse because there's no longer a consumer class with the financial wherewithal to buy them.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)It might start off with the Rich Schools getting all the good teachers and classes, but I assure you that is NOT what they will remain. Their rich parents, many of them fundamentalist Christians, do NOT want their children to think any more than they have to.
https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/jessie-golem/leaving-the-church_b_4816252.html
Christians that educated their children to debate the Heathen found that,lo and behold, some of their kids lost faith, which is why every inch of those "elite" schools on the Hill will be a cattle pen, a Brahman cattle pen, but still a pen. After all, not like these rich kids will actually need to MAKE wealth, just allow their employees to manipulate it for them.
Want Proof? Besty Devos could have bought her way into any school, she got a four year degree, thatw as not even an education degree, from a local Bible College. She knows she can act as stupid as she wants, and never have her stated goal of education thwarted, which is to "reach children for Christ."
I also say this as a student of Catholic schools where the rich kids were stupid, took pride in being stupid, and were praisde by clergy for being stupid, because those types filled the church coffer.
VOX
(22,976 posts)It's something I'm aware of, but seeing it in print delivers more of a blow. Thanks for the link.
"...a Brahman cattle pen..." -- whew.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)LongTomH
(8,636 posts)...
We need a Deep Blue Wave A complete turnaround from the Reaganomic / Military-Congressional-Industrial Complex policies of the last half-century.
TomSlick
(11,098 posts)The Walton family has been spending piles of money advancing "school choice" and charter schools in Arkansas. Most recently, $300 Million.
[link:https://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2018/04/09/walton-foundation-pours-300-million-more-into-charter-schools-to-ease-loans-for-new-buildings|
I have long wondered why. Now I get it.
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)You know, it takes MONEY to cheat. They are like card sharks with a stacked deck, shit eating grin all the way to the bank.
TomSlick
(11,098 posts)I had guessed it was because of some personal beef with public schools. Now, you have me wondering.
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)These fuckers don't spend a dime unless it is going to make them $50.