General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy don't we talk about Mitt's Mormonism? The Brits. do.
&feature=player_detailpageThis sort of thing is no lose. We don't even have to be unfair. I know I'm a broken record on this, but, man. This is just too easy. I know dems. don't like to be bigots, and I KNOW I'm walking a very fine line here. But, come on. Do Americans get it? Really?
Oh, yeah, the piece above is good.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)and scorn heaped on Mormonism (or Scientology, for that matter), then we best shut up.
Seriously - what's stupider? Magic underwear, or believing a guy came back from the dead? Believing that when you die you get your own planet to live on, or that you go to heaven to live with Jeebus?
It's all idiotic, childish bullshit.
Fair is fair. All fairy tales have the same connection to reality, which is to say, "none."
ithinkmyliverhurts
(1,928 posts)JFK's Catholicism was used against him. But let's see Mittens use the argument you just used. None of these people are going to use an absurdist argument or the argument that it's all bullshit anyway. If Obama's time in a black social-gospel church was an issue, well, then . . .
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Bucky
(54,068 posts)There's nothing wrong with pointing out the silliness inherent in deistic religious belief systems rooted in Stone Age mythologies. It's just a remarkably dumb idea to do so in the name of the Democratic Party, which counts on the support of millions of Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim, and Buddhist voting blocks. Mixing religion and partisan politics has always been a bad idea. It gets people killed and it shuts off the dialog necessary for the marketplace of ideas. How many times do we have to burn our hands on the stove before learning there's a reason Goddess gave us oven mitts?
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)At least with the other religions (Catholicism, Methodism, Lutheran......) they have the decency to follow something that wasnt made up (or discovered or founded) so recently that there are people who can remember the founders and call them on their bullshit. I am related (by marriage) to one of the big proponents of the newish movement of Southern Pentacostalism and the rest of the family knew for years and now generations that same said great great uncle was completely full of shit. Mormonism, for one, was founded by a convicted fraudster. Lets own up to that fact and not gloss over it or call it bashing.
Let's have some Atheists run for office who will not be beholden to (or scared of) great beings in the sky. You wouldnt go to a heart surgeon who still believed in Santa Claus?
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)Santa Claus could still be a good surgeon--you'd just know you'd get great Christmas cards from him each year More apt would be, "Would you trust a faith healer to cure you appendectomy over a surgeon?" Likewise with a president. We really don't want a president who, as Scott Walker did, meets people's complaints about fire and drought by praying for rain rather than trying to engineer ways to pipe in water.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)It's one thing to go to heaven to be with the god-figure. A lot of religions feature that. But your own planet? That's a new one.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)But on another planet?! Wow, that's just effing crazy!
treestar
(82,383 posts)It's being god of your own planet! That's a new one.
mucifer
(23,570 posts)that he is involved with that are going to air commercials that President Obama would not approve of.
This could be one of the issues he was talking about.
niceguy
(25 posts)It shouldn't matter....
ithinkmyliverhurts
(1,928 posts)Bush-the-dumber's Israel policy is exactly predicated upon his evangelical faith. And Sarah Palin, well, yeah. No. And those videos surfaced. I don't want a smear job or anything untoward. I just want people to understand Mittens' background. He says his faith forms who he is, so we should look (as we should with any candidate who applies for the job). Santorum is very open about his faith and how it works in his life. This may always be his downfall. I'm just looking for something similar.
elleng
(131,136 posts)but applying it in a way that doesn't appear bigotted is difficult.
SO MANY THINGS about rmoney can't be discussed! His religion, his taxes, his jobs (even when its his job at Bain he relies on to argue he understands the economy, and as governor>health care reform.)
spanone
(135,884 posts)dimbear
(6,271 posts)If you are basically a political organization, you're going to get backlash.
Bucky
(54,068 posts)What d'ya think, maybe we should put 'em in camps or something?
Seriously, I loathe it when Democrats mimic fascist talking points. In your heart, you know better than this.
blueamy66
(6,795 posts)I know that's not the real number, but we all know that they just let Black men become priests about 20 years ago.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)It was the actions of many, giving money to promote the removal of rights of people their religion tells them to hate. When I see the majority of mormons pooling their money together to fight for equality, then I will change my mind.
That goes for every religion out there using their power and money to harm others.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)You really need to watch "The Mormon Proposition". Internal memos among LDS officials were quite clear about their concern with their actions becoming public in relation to their coordination of the campaign.
railsback
(1,881 posts)Last edited Mon Jul 30, 2012, 01:51 AM - Edit history (1)
believes God exists in human form and lives on a distant planet called Kolob. Scientology also has the space alien thing going, and nobody seems to have a problem lambasting that 'church'. And it weren't for social pressures, the Mormons would still believe (and probably still do under their breath) that blacks were once white people who got burned dark for being evil.
Mormonism isn't your average 'praise God' religion. There's some seriously weird stuff going on here.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)railsback
(1,881 posts)Drink his 'blood' and whatnot, but they also got extra weird additions, such as the Bible Part 3.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)and he's gonna come back soon. Meanwhile people eat his meat and drink his blood -- that doesn't strike you as seriously weird?
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I think a lot of the things I dislike in Romney have to do with his experience as a Mormon.
But, I refuse to be discriminatory about the fact of his participation and defend our side when Obama is "accused" of being a Muslim. My answer for that is "so what if he is?"
Consistency does matter.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)If you bring your religion out into politics, say that it is a huge force in your life, try to make me live by your beliefs then I have a right to question your religion.
Keep it to yourself and everything will be fine
Iggo
(47,571 posts)Huh.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)due to a desire to break free from the Church of England. That is why there is no religious requirement/clause for POTUS and the whole freedom of religion (separation of church and state) thing in the founding documents.
That said, when someone's faith determines their priorities in governance (see: Palin, Sarah) it is a critical issue, but do we really want to open that general can of worms?
Bucky
(54,068 posts)Amen. We can have discussions about religion outside of politics. But when you mix the two, you shut down conversations and you destroy the spirit of tolerance needed for a liberal democracy. The Founders knew their history: the Reformation wars, the Thirty Years War, the Crusades and the plundering of Constantinople, the waves of anti-Catholic and then anti-Protestant persecutions in Britain, the English Civil War...
Religion historically leads to factionalism. Democracy, at its best, depends on tolerance. They're not "oil and water" - they're potassium and water.
renate
(13,776 posts)If he would let his faith guide his decisions, it's extremely relevant.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)And that the same guy turned water into wine, and fed 5000 people with a couple of loaves and fishes.
I mean, he must be mentally unbalanced to believe this kind of crap, no?
Bucky
(54,068 posts)The Comeback Kid!! Woo-hoo!
Oh, I'm sorry. Am I off topic?
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...if they would have allowed him to fully participate.
But, alas, the LDS did not allow black people to gain full endowment until 1978. This was a policy which Mitt Romney, of course, supported as bishop and during his missionary work.
While the "mark of Cain" was indeed an edict from God, it was nonetheless one which Mr. Romney taught and supported.
That is relevant, sorry.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Henry Blodget isn't exactly MSM, but his site is heavily traffic'd
http://www.businessinsider.com/how-mormonism-was-founded-2012-7
For example:
- Do Mormons have any weird beliefs or practices that might make a President do strange things?
- Is there a Mormon "pope" or other boss that a President might feel some greater allegiance to?
- Can Mormons truly separate "church" and "state"--or do they think that their "God's law" is higher than American law?
And so on...
And how did Mormonism come to be, anyway? Wasn't it founded only a relatively little while ago by some dude in upstate New York? (Upstate New York?!)
Bucky
(54,068 posts)Because most liberal Americans don't want their arguments to be associated with the right wing bigots who tried (and failed) to make it big deal during the Republican nomination race. Because all bigots suck. Because "first they came for the Jews." Because the "land of liberty" should mean just that.
aikoaiko
(34,184 posts)I'm an atheist and I don't really feel compelled to denigrate one person's religion while giving a pass to the religion of my candidate.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)it's the time he spent as stake (roughly equivalent to a Catholic diocese) president in Boston. That makes him part of the LDS Church's leadership. That's a whole different kettle of fish than, say, JFK's (lay) Catholicism.
Hamlette
(15,412 posts)As is Bishop. All mormon men earn some title like that if they go to church often. It's a complete no big deal. He prolly got to be stake president because of either his money or political ambitions. Mormons love people with money, in fact, they tell their missionaries to convert only rich people on their missions overseas. They say its because the rich and powerful will then do the converting after the missionaries leave but I think its because they like the 10%.
And stake presidents have NO say in leadership. Way too far down the line. First there is president, he has 2 close aids, (called "the presidency" then under that is the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, and under that there are several groups called "quorum of 70". Only some of the members of the first and second quorum (I think there about 12 quorums of the 70) have any authority over church doctrine. And of course the 12 apostles and and the top three guys (the presidency).
Stake presidents don't have anything to do, unless they are are also in the quorums, with decisions in the church or leadership except as to the wards they oversee.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)his money and their money, all wrapped up together. I know it sounds paranoid, but is it a plot for Mormons to take over the US? We have no clue how much wealth Romney has amassed, how the church is tied to it, and how much of the USA they own.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Even though any bishop of any religion might have done that. But I wonder if more mainstream religions would do that nowadays.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)That he is 27 and living in Salt Lake City??
treestar
(82,383 posts)since he's living is SLC, but that seems contra-indicated by his mother's story. Are you thinking he resembles the Mittwit?
kentuck
(111,110 posts)She said she called Mitt when the baby was sick and he sent two other people to see her and that was more or less her break with the Mormon Church.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Hey it's no worse than the Obama/Davis crap. The right could use the lesson.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)Maybe she did?
K8-EEE
(15,667 posts)because he is excited about the world going to hell in a handbasket so Jesus can come and rule the universe for 1000 years with the LDS in Missouri!!
I'm sorry but why is Rev Wright/ "everyone thinks Obama is a MUZZLIM" stuff fine for US media but Mitt's REAL BELIEFS and the fact that he won't say he believes in the separation of Church and State NOT ALLOWED TO BE BROUGHT UP.
longship
(40,416 posts)Notice that it is our First Amendment. More importantly, there is Article VI, which I recommend you read. Naw! I won't presume you will do that, so here's the applicable clause:
{emphasis mine}
I am a lifelong atheist. I despise religion. But, damn it! Campaigning against a candidate's religion is just plain wrong!
If Mitt opens the door to this by, for instance, saying that his policies are informed by his faith, so be it. But he hasn't, nor will he.
Plus, are we going to then oppose Harry "Golden Gloves" Reid?
Let's end this once and for all. A person's religious belief is a non sequitur.
It's his position on policy which make Romney unsuitable for the Oval Office, not his religious belief. That's the American way.
Enough of this bullshit. If you disagree, read the fucking Article VI quote above again.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)They were all bad-mouthing and persecuting our whackadoodle cults, man.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)At about the 22 minute mark of the video, a lady is interviewed who had a child out of wedlock and Mitt Romney wanted her to give up her child to the church. She refused and felt as if she had been excommunicated from the church. Mitt was a high official in the church at the time.
She says she is happy she kept her baby and they showed a picture of him and said he was 27 years old and living in Salt Lake City.
He looked just like Mitt Romney!!!! No kidding.
mnhtnbb
(31,405 posts)It's at 30:14 and he corrects himself, "I mean President Obama".
I caught that.
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)at points, it seems to be more about Mormons and the fundamentalists polygamous Mormons that about Mittster. The Mittwit should not be tainted with the polygamy end of it, though it's about as fair as calling Obama a Muslim. Still the ignorant hear the middle name "Hussein" and perhaps think it's reasonable.
I'd love to see one of those first of plural wives try for a divorce. That would create an interesting legal mess. I was at first thinking it's not so believable that Husband rotates among his wives - he probably stays with the newest one more. But then, you start to realize, it would be bad to piss off legal wife #1.
We always see the President with children and say he's a natural. There were a few scenes there were Mitt had a kid or two and the context seems to show they are his own grandchildren, yet they don't look that thrilled. It would be funny to see Obama pick up one of Mitt's own grandchildren. They'd probably be happy.
A lot of religions demand 10% but why are the Mormons so good at collecting/enforcing it?
oldhippydude
(2,514 posts)in the mid 60's i read book by Irving wallace called the 27th wife... i am sure it is long since out of print... rather lengthy but a good read.. unfortunately that was during my teen years and i remember little beyond the title..
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)What's required for office is different from what will influence votes. Since it matters to many voters, I think they should be aware of the fact that Romney's religion is not biblical. That could be done well, even though it might take extra diplomacy.
trof
(54,256 posts)This need wide distribution.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)No Dem affiliation. Just someone to spook the horse so to speak. Fear of being baptized after death with a Mormon President. How many wives does Mitt Rmoney have? If Rmoney's dad was born in Mexico, does that make Mittens a citizen of Mexico?
marlakay
(11,498 posts)is a mormon!