Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonald Trump's New Lawyer Once Argued Presidents Can Be Indicted
http://time.com/5206281/joseph-digenova-donald-trump-president-indicted/
Donald Trump's New Lawyer Once Argued Presidents Can Be Indicted
By Tessa Berenson March 19, 2018
President Donald Trumps new lawyer once argued that sitting presidents can be indicted, a key constitutional question facing special counsel Robert Muellers team.
Trumps pick of longtime Washington lawyer Joseph diGenova drew attention because he has aggressively argued in television appearances that the FBI and the Justice Department are framing the president.
But his prior comments during investigations into President Bill Clinton in a 1997 editorial in the Wall Street Journal also drew attention.
Nobody should underestimate the upheaval that a prosecution of the president would cause, he wrote in a March 6, 1997 piece published when independent counsel Kenneth Starr was only investigating financial irregularities in the Whitewater scandal and Clintons affair with a White House intern had not yet come to light. But we went through it once before, in Watergate, and survived. The nation, in fact, could conceivably benefit from the indictment of a president. It would teach the valuable civics lesson that no one is above the law.
Theres a constitutional question about whether a sitting president can be criminally prosecuted, and there isnt a clear answer. It has never happened before, and no court has definitively ruled on the issue. The Supreme Court heard arguments about it in 1974 about President Richard Nixon, but never resolved the question. You can read more about that issue here.
DiGenovas position has taken on fresh relevance now that hes been hired to the legal team of a president currently embroiled in a special counsel investigation. diGenovas Wall Street Journal piece was published during the independent counsel probe of President Bill Clinton, and he wrote at that time, Independent counsels are not appointed by the White House, so presumably they should be free to pursue criminal charges against the president if his actions warrant it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 790 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donald Trump's New Lawyer Once Argued Presidents Can Be Indicted (Original Post)
babylonsister
Mar 2018
OP
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)1. Quelle surprise. He hated Russian commies before too, I'll bet.
He's another freakish mutant, all the dregs are coagulating together around our carbuncle in chief.
mnmoderatedem
(3,728 posts)2. he's trump's kind of lawyer
to be sure, trumptards are going to counter that DiGenova is not saying presidents can't or shouldn't be prosecuted. Just that he claims Mueller is part of the Deep State conspiracy to take down trump. He's said as much already.
Where Dowd and Cobb seem to recognize the reality of the situation, and see the inevitability of trump having to be confronted by Mueller at some point down the road, DiGenove has latched onto loony Deep State conspiracy theories, which is why he appeals to trump.