Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 712 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In the time it takes to read this image (Original Post)
ffr
Mar 2018
OP
needledriver
(836 posts)1. If you have a fully automatic weapon,
which is either belt fed or has a magazine with an over 42 round capacity.
Whats the point of this meme?
blake2012
(1,294 posts)2. To visualize wanton slaughter
It is effective. I imagine some gun nuts will take issue with it which is awesome.
needledriver
(836 posts)3. Fair enough.
But if you are going to create a stark, powerful meme to visualize wanton slaughter, wouldnt it be more effective if you simply showed the truth?
If the poster had 26 holes instead of 42, it would still make a graphically powerful point, and be directly addressing some of the issues; semi automatic weapons and large capacity magazines.
Does exaggerating the effects of the firepower of a typical assault weapon help or hurt efforts to regulate them?
blake2012
(1,294 posts)4. Maybe their intended audience are slower readers