Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kemah

(276 posts)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 04:28 PM Jul 2012

Las Vegas is a good example of a town created by a government project.

If it wasn't for Hoover Dam, Vegas would not exist. Just another small down in the desert. Cheap hydroelectric power and Lake Meade are the reason Vegas can exist. The Hoover Dam workers would go to Vegas to gamble, drink, and hook up with hookers. The government housing for the workers did not allow such activities.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
1. If you're arguing that government projects can be good
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 04:29 PM
Jul 2012

I'm not sure you chose the best example to make your case.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
4. I think the point is that it is popular on
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 05:17 PM
Jul 2012

the dark side and might (doubtful) show them that government projects work for them too.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. Also have to thank Bugsy Seigel for development capital and the "vision thing."
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 04:36 PM
Jul 2012
Better call the Chicago Mob, "Job Creators." Or, else.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
5. Both Nevada and Arizona owe their existence as major cities to the government.
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 05:37 PM
Jul 2012

Arizona was a solidly Democratic state, and territory before that, mostly because Washington kept appointing republican governors. They sent people like Carl Hayden and Richard McCormick to bring home the bacon, and they did.

Boulder Dam, Roosevelt Dam, and the Central Arizona projects are why 5+M people can live there. Without huge government expense there would be nothing but an atrophied mining industry and some subsistence farming.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
6. The Dam helped.
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 05:38 PM
Jul 2012

Still, prohibition, and then the end of prohibition, actually had far more to do with it, especially in terms of longevity. Yeah, I know. Still government acts. Got it.

Cerridwen

(13,260 posts)
8. Vegas is a good example of what happens when
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 06:13 PM
Jul 2012

a mormon banker convinces the banking industry that it's okay to do banking business with the mob and how greed, the LOVE of money, can be manipulated into creating a town in the fucking desert.

All the rest is just a rendition of water, grazing, and mining interests manipulating the government lands offices in the US southwest.

Signed,

A native Las Vegan.

 

doohnibor

(97 posts)
9. If you want to see Las Vegas without Boulder Dam*, look west
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 06:16 PM
Jul 2012

Look on the WEST side of Mt. Charleston to see what is possible without abundant water and electricity. Pahrump is a good size town, but it's never going to be able to support one high-rise resort, let alone dozens. Without big government projects, Las Vegas and Phoenix would be more like Pahrump and Kingman, more than just jackrabbits, but NOT big cities.

[font size = 1]
*If you are an FDR New Dealer type, you will refer to it by its proper name, Boulder Dam, just as nowadays we refer to the DC airport as Washington National instead of humoring the Republican fetish of naming stuff after their disasters.

bhikkhu

(10,720 posts)
10. The Grand Coulee Dam, and the US aviation industry are a better example
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 06:24 PM
Jul 2012

The dam provided the power to smelt the aluminum and build the planes with which we won WWII. And transformed the economy of the whole NW... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Coulee_Dam

Igel

(35,337 posts)
11. So you're saying that a government prohibition was a positive act of creation.
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 07:45 PM
Jul 2012

After all, if not for the ban on drinking and gambling in government housing ...

So if we want to help things, we should prohibit more things?


Still, the entire argument misses the main point. Idee fixe to the point of monomania on both sides. (Can somebody please help produce a corpus callosum in the body politic?)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Las Vegas is a good examp...