General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWALK OUT - my daughter just finished theirs
The county relented last week. No punishment no restrictions on sports tryouts or the big field trip.
I'm very proud of her. ❤️
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)Her generation will be heard. Every election will matter.
Thank you , Miss underpants.
PunksMom
(440 posts)in Baltimore...so proud of them.
ffr
(22,670 posts)Link to tweet
Students at Livingston High School in New Jersey sing an adaptation of Brian Stokes Mitchells Make Them Hear You" as part of their walkout. #NationalWalkoutDay
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)ONE
HUNDRED
MILLION
AMERICANS
(how many are aged 10-30? more probably)
Love this video.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)the track team and the older two are kicked out of National Honor Society. Welcome to red state Wisconsin I guess... but obviously we are proud of them.
mama
(164 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Last edited Wed Mar 14, 2018, 02:44 PM - Edit history (1)
Wear it with pride.
moriah
(8,311 posts)I would question the history of expulsion from the Honor Society or exclusion from sports tryouts for missing one class in a school day.
If others who have been caught skipping class were punished less severely for a first offense, then it is likely the district will be in deep shit if enough parents complain about politically-motivated excessive punishments.
Edot to add: yes, civil disobedience has consequences. No, it shouldn't have more consequences than the same disobedience not involving political speech.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Perhaps it's not simply 'missing a class' / 'skipping class', but the disruption caused by leaving class in the middle of a period.
ie, don't compare an apple to an orange. What's the punishment for a kid standing up and saying, "I'm out of here." and leaving school by him/herself- compare the punishment for that to today's protest.
If they're the same.. tough shit. Civil disobedience has a cost. Deal with it, or don't do it.
moriah
(8,311 posts)One NJ district technically could knock 10 points off of that class's quarter average grade for their students who protest, as "cutting class" has a higher penalty than merely an unexcused absence (which would be detention on first offense, not suspension).
But again, if you protest, know the rules you'll be breaking and the punishment. And fight if that punishment is more punitive than guidance demands.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)leaving school grounds without permission or in the accompany of their parent (whatever the offense is called.)
If they're applying a stronger punishment for the same offense today, for a political protest, than they are for an individual just getting up and saying, "gotta go, see ya"-- then they're in trouble.
If not? Take the punishment and don't whine.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)They should not punish kids for standing up for what is right for the school.
Punishing the students for protesting gun violence is foolish and wrong.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Schools should not be endorsing one political cause over another.
Should christian students be able to protest abortion by scheduling walk-outs without consequence? How about white nationalists?
Anti-immigration?
Or is it only causes that you agree with that you think should be endorsed and consequence free?
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)be interested in supporting the students demonstrating for school safety.
None of the other causes are related to the school itself.
It isn't just a political cause. It is about safety in our schools.
In fact, school safety as a cause crosses all political and religious lines. It should not be a divisive issue at all.
It is only because there is a lot of money to be made in selling guns to crazy fanatics.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Pull the other one, it's got bells on it.
I get it- the causes that you care about should cause the school to be more lenient when rules are broken.
Free hint: Others could make the same 'important' claim about abortion, or immigration, or.. etc.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)CHILDREN due to the shooting of guns in our schools. It is not political. There can only be one moral opinion on it: the school shootings have to stop.
It is not a political issue.
It is an issue about safety in our schools.
I have children and grandchildren. I want them to be safe in their schools. If the slide was broken, I would go to the school and complain about it.
When we have so many school shootings, it is a definite indication that our gun laws are broken. We need to fix them. It is no more a political issue than fixing the slide in the school yard. It is a school security issue. We need to demand that school authorities and our government fix it.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)No.
Schools can't be choosing which issues they endorse and which civil disobedience they punish and which they ignore.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)The issue is school violence.
And the school is correct in encouraging its students to participate in public demonstrations on that issue which affects the schools and that school so definitely.
The school is just as much within its rights to assist students in protesting school shootings as it is to assist students in protesting any other kind of school violence. If bullies among the children or from outside the school were beating children in the school yard, the school would absolutely be within its rights to encourage the children to protest the beatings in any way they want to. In fact, a school near me has a sign in front of the school warning against school violence. I think that is great.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)But to ask a school to look the other way for one act of civil disobedience and punish another?
No, schools should not be in the business of endorsing one political position over another w/r/t punishment.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)the same as "endorsing one political position over another."
This is about saving lives.
This is about demonstrating to save lives in schools.
School shootings are a safety issue.
Demonstrating for gun legislation aimed to stop the killing of our children is the equivalent of demonstrating for safe crossings in front of the schools, for safe slides and swings, for safety in any aspect of education.
CHILDREN HAVE DIED due to our lax laws with regard to shootings in schools. This has to be corrected. If a school lunch room served food that caused deaths due to food poisoning and no one did anything about it, the school would be right in allowing the students to protest without penalties.
This is a safety issue that affects all children. It is not a political issue in the usual sense. This is an issue that directly has affected many, many American children and their families.
The shooting in Parkland was the last straw. No school should punish any student who participates in efforts to end the school shootings.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Of course it's political.
The rabid right would say the same about abortion- CHILDREN ARE DYING, etc.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)It's no different from demonstrating to obtain legislation that would better fund the schools or support school safety in terms of guards at crosswalks or safer school buses.
This is a legislative issue that affects the schools and education. Of course students can demonstrate in favor of it.
As I said, my local school posts a sign to address the problem of school bullying. The shootings in the schools are an extreme form of school bullying.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)There's no "this rule doesn't apply when it's an issue we like" clause.
The last thing we need is schools deciding which rule breaking they punish and which they don't.
No. Just no.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)mean a call home. Nothing more. BUT because the school Superintendent is a major right-wing authoritarian, the girls get a suspension on their record, and my youngest cannot participate in a sport she loves. I don't know for a fact that the Superintendent is a TRUMP-humper but I expect he is.
OnDoutside
(19,962 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)... could be labeling the walkout as. And see the usual punishment.
I saw one NJ student handbook could count it as "cutting class" and drop the kid's grade by 10 points that quarter in the class on the first offense. There might be something they're legally using to punish so severely.
But if not, join with the other parents and fight like hell.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Sick fucks.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)What leads you to believe there is surprise?
I see resignation of consequence, but no surprise...
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Tone.
Reading comprehension allows one to read tone in text.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Which, in my nearly 26 years of experience communicating online about hot-button issues, is the primary cause of many misunderstandings and flame wars.
Another cause is sloppy grammar, particularly using the word "you" to mean "one" or "a person".
rainin
(3,011 posts)Actions like this by authority figures should be fought, not submitted to. "Wearing it" just discourages others -- which is exactly what they want. Get a lawyer. Reach out to anyone who will listen. Use social media. Get sponsors to support court action. Make them an example that if they treat these kids any differently than kids who miss school for any other unexcused reason, they will lose their jobs.
My HS kids had unexcused absences and never got forced from their sport or National Honor Society. That is clear abuse of power.
FIGHT IT!!
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)If they'd protested by not showing up at school today (a la some labor events) then if the punishment were worse than any other unexcused absence, then there'd be reason to fight.
I noticed that in one district kids just went to the gym, and only one student left school grounds. Apparently some students are aware of the consequences of leaving school grounds and choose to exercise civil disobedience in a more tame manner.
rainin
(3,011 posts)every unexcused absence is treated with the same punishment.
(Not the same district, years ago) My son left school without signing out and he was reminded when he returned that he needed to sign out. No consequence. Other than confirming it wasn't an excused absence, he wasn't required to state why he left.
When he was absent, his absence was either documented as excused or unexcused. He was allowed several unexcused absences before consequences kicked in and those were a matter of district policy and enforced fairly.
I would get advice from a good attorney. I would absolutely give the Principal/Superintendent the opportunity to reverse this decision. If he doesn't, I would proceed with legal action.
I am not against consequences, but we can all see this is political. As parents, we are allowed to demand that all children be treated equally. A school official isn't God. Sometimes, he/she can make a wrong call. Removing these kids from their sport and the NHS is a punitive action taken by a control freak.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Would you say the same if a group of white nationalists staged a walkout?
rainin
(3,011 posts)Show me the written policy that forbids this.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)I'm sure every school has rules to that effect. Wouldn't you agree?
rainin
(3,011 posts)Every school has rules about unexcused absences. I don't recall all of them, but I do remember that if my kids got more than 3 (or 5?) then they would no longer be eligible for exemption from the final exam in their AP classes. That was one rule.
So my kids took their final exams in addition to the AP exams when they exceeded that number of absences. They were never kicked out of National Honor Society, nor were they kicked off their sports teams.
So, yes, there are rules.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)In the schools around here, an unexcused absence is ditching for the day.
Getting up in the middle of the day, disrupting class and walking out and leaving school grounds is not simply an unexcused absence.
Not at any of the public nor private schools I'm familiar with.
moriah
(8,311 posts)In the Little Rock School District, a walkout is encompassed under the Category I rule:
"Rule 5: Leaving School Grounds/ Class Without Permission of a School Official/Skipping/Cutting Class"
Insubordination or not following a reasonable order from a teacher is also a Category I.
The maximum allowed punishment is in-school suspension for any first offense of violating a Category I rule. There is no mandatory punishment for a first Category I violation, and contacting a parent is not mandatory.
So, in Little Rock, if any student is given a full suspension vs ISS, there's definitely a claim for going above what the district has mandated as reasonable discretion on punishments.
Edit to add: Looked up what our district decided, and it looks like the ealkouts were essentially designated a "voluntary assembly" lasting 30 minutes in total, and students would only be punished if out of class longer than that. So 17 for the assembly and 5 minutes to-from it, with 3 minutes for hallway delays.
http://katv.com/news/local/arkansas-students-participate-in-walkout-after-florida-school-shooting
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)There is a written policy that proscribes the behavior in question.
Thanks.
moriah
(8,311 posts)That's the key thing for deciding if a school has gone beynd enforcement of regular rules to illegal suppression of speech.
As I said, LRSD went ahead and decided the least disruptive thing was to allow/regulate the assembly. That may not be the decision of all school districts, and a smart thing for organizers to have done prior in each school would have been getting the student government to petition the school to sanction it in that way. Essentially, asking for a permit in the adult world. Thrre could have been lawsuits if the permit was denied when other groups had been allowed assemblies during classtime.
But say you didn't get your permit and decide to demonstrate anyway, in the adult world, and tried to stand silent for 17 minutes, or have another peaceful but possibly noisy assembly. You shouldn't get charged with conspiracy to incite a riot if your protest was peaceful -- disorderly conduct possibly, but not rioting. It got thrown out against the DC protesters as over-charging.
So if LRSD had not decided to roll with it, and students demonstrated peacefully then got back to class, had they received harsher punishment than the maximum of ISS... or had they tried to classify peaceful assembly as actual rioting.... then there would have been grounds for unhappiness for the district.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)It's not quite analogous to speech in a public setting, but it doesn't swing 100% in the school's favor, either.
Smart of LRSD to set boundaries for the sanctioned activity- I assume students stayed on campus. Had a student chosen to go further
and leave campus (like the one student in.. what was it.. NJ?) I expect punishment would have been appropriate (commensurate with their standing rules, of course).
marybourg
(12,633 posts)Sorry to correct - but experience has proved that one mistake can beget a new and incorrect usage
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)... especially on the Honor Society thing.
Look at prior trends for punishment for skipping one class. If the punishment applied is excessive, there's a good chance they broke the law. I can't imagine one unexcused absence from a class normally results in expulsion from the National Honor Society.
rurallib
(62,423 posts)Your daughters deserve our admiration for their stand.
pandr32
(11,588 posts)They are the change this country needs.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)rightwing traitorous black hating, woman hating, gay hating assholes will learn even if it has to be the HARD way.
if EVERYBODY is suspended, they wont have a choice but to stop suspending people.
MontanaMama
(23,322 posts)We got home last night after 25 hours of traveling from Australia and I offered to let him sleep in and he declined stating he wanted to be part of the walk out. These kids are changing the world. Its quite moving.
Let your son know how proud we all are of him. He is an inspiration. All of these kids are.
niyad
(113,344 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I have to hand it to Charlie Baker, our Republican governor of MA (and I never thought I would say this) but I heard him on TV yesterday talking about the blizzard and the walkout today and he endorsed it and said he had spoken to some young people and believed that they weren't about politics, but that they needed to take this issue into their own hands because they didn't feel like adults were listening. Why the hell can't more Republicans be like him? He is actually rational and decent.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)There aren't any that I'd actively vote for over a Democrat at the moment, but I still feel proud of my vote for Weld in the 90's and Baker has been a solid governor. I don't agree with certain stands but he's not trying to radicalize the state but work within it. I've much respect for him and he's handled all of these weather storms VERY well.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Weld ran against John Silber for Governor of MA. I was die-hard Democrat, but socially, it was almost like the parties were reversed and Silber was just an odious human being and very anti-woman. Weld was a social liberal and a moderate in other areas, so I cast my vote for him. That is probably the first and last time I will ever vote republican. Why are NE/MA Republicans so unpopular? Is it because they aren't hateful enough?
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Silber was just plain wrong on all levels. I couldn't understand how he was a Dem in MA.
poboy2
(2,078 posts)SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)Their generation will be a generation of DOERS, not indifferent spectators.
Thanks for raising a daughter with a social conscience.
benld74
(9,904 posts)Individual schools were mentioned as taking part in the WALK OUTS.
Other schools, stuck by the blunt, mundane statements of
Walk outs are against school policy and will be dealt with as such
Such idiots were in majority within STL unfortunately
My daughter's was NOT
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)Please thank your wonderful daughter for me!
My youngest is in college. I had hoped they could do something today, but they are on spring break.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)I am very proud of Gen Z.
GallopingGhost
(2,404 posts)TV channel pulled programming for seventeen minutes this morning in solidarity.
I am so proud of all these brave kids and the parents, grandparents and community members who are supporting them.
There is still hope for this country.
underpants
(182,829 posts)Thanks.
GallopingGhost
(2,404 posts)I was changing channels.
It surprised me but it was awesome. Kudos to them!
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)But it is a big deal ESPECIALLY given the age of some of the walk-outs.
Not to mention the push-back from the right-wingers both students and parents.
Think of how much sooner the Vietnam War might have ended had the protesters started when they were 9.
Proud of you and your daughter!
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)My daughter's high school is on break, so she didn't have a chance to do it.