General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConor Lamb 52.40% 240 : Rep Rick Saccone 46.94% 215
It is a start of something good
1/253 Precincts reporting
http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/PA/Allegheny/73817/Web02.193333/#/cid/0102
Party Candidate % Votes
Dem Conor Lamb 52.40% 240
Rep Rick Saccone 46.94% 215
LIB Drew Gray Miller 0.44% 2
WRITE-IN
RandySF
(58,899 posts)riversedge
(70,242 posts)Unofficial Results
Home
ResultsRepresentative in Congress 18TH DISTRICT
Representative in Congress 18TH DISTRICT(Vote For 1)
Last updated
3/13/2018 8:31:45 PM EDT
Full screen
Share
Not Participating
Not Reporting
Tie
Table view
Chart view
Results
Vote types
2/253 Precincts reporting
Overall Allegheny Results
Party Candidate % Votes
Dem Conor Lamb 56.43% 439
Rep Rick Saccone 42.80% 333
LIB Drew Gray Miller 0.64% 5
WRITE-IN 0.13% 1
Votes Cast 778
RandySF
(58,899 posts)riversedge
(70,242 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)oasis
(49,389 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,864 posts)riversedge
(70,242 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)ATM overall it's almost 60/40 LAMB ... mostly Allegheny reporting so far (43% of population, with 10% vote in ... 62-38 LAMB)
Greene is only 2% of the population but it's rural and with 18% of it's vote in ... is 54/44 SACCONE.
We've got no Westmoreland (33% pop) or Washington (22%) reporting yet, however. Expect those to go more Saccone's way.
Looking good so far ladies and gents!!!
nolabear
(41,985 posts)Fingers, toes, etc. crossed (and if youve ever tried crossing an etc....)
marble falls
(57,102 posts)Dem Conor Lamb 61.86% 6,041
Rep Rick Saccone 37.55% 3,667
LIB Drew Gray Miller 0.54% 53
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Lambs ahead of the benchmarks in every county save Westmoreland since we've no results from there. He's supposed to be down by -6% in Washington instead he's up by almost 8%. In Allegheny he's expected up by +6% but he's up 19%.
And he's not down in Greene as much as expected either though thats 2% of pop and very rural, so ...
Motownman78
(491 posts)Saccone will win by 1.8%. Kinda disappointing.
KelleyKramer
(8,969 posts)Just curious
Motownman78
(491 posts)budkin
(6,703 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)And Nate said if he hits those benchmarks he should win.
Needs to be behind in Washington county by <=6% and he's only down .5.
Need to be down by <=13% in Westmoreland and he's down 12.3%
Needs to be up by >=14% in Allegheny and he's up 15.3%
Green not enough to matter but he's beating that bench too.
Yonnie3
(17,444 posts)Right now the projector says Lamb +0.3%
now 0.4%
We need to wait until the colored bands narrow around the needle.
I'm looking at:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/03/13/us/elections/results-pennsylvania-house-special-election.html#eln-forecast-section
Yonnie3
(17,444 posts)Westmoreland is not reporting by precinct so their model doesn't have input data.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Are taking a coffee break, you see.
Or are is this when the Russians gather up the numbers so far and figure out how much they need to tweak the remainder to make sure Saccone gets the win ... Dun-dun-DUUUUUUUUNNNN!!!
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Need him to not lose by 13% and he's now down 13.8.
BUT his Allegheny margin is higher than needed at +16.1 vs +14
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)This is bullshit ...
EDIT: boom there they are ... not TOO terrible news, benchmark is -6% on this county for Lamb and he's down 5.5%.
Motownman78
(491 posts)He fell behind there as well