General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan Dick's enforce selling to those 21 and over?
Not sure how this will work if the legal age is 18.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)rzemanfl
(29,566 posts)Historic NY
(37,452 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,816 posts)No impediment whatsoever.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,816 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Many states have anti-discrimination laws that only say age, without qualifications as to what age.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)But since, as stated elsewhere in this thread, 18-20-year-olds aren't a protected class.
Example: car rental agencies don't rent to drivers under 25 regardless the legal driving age.
dalton99a
(81,565 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,426 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Short of violating civil rights, they are free to deny sales or service or both to anyone they choose.
forthemiddle
(1,381 posts)If the law doesnt state under the age of 21, is this discrimination any different than the bakery case?
Can a business pick and choose who they sell a legal product too?
Im just wondering, not advocating on these grounds.
B2G
(9,766 posts)And I fully support the legal age being 21.
forthemiddle
(1,381 posts)That's IF they change the law, I just am not comfortable with the age discrimination, for either younger adults, or older.
Demsrule86
(68,632 posts)I am delighted. The beginning of the end for gun humpers and maybe an end to mass murder at the hands of the second amendment crowd.
mythology
(9,527 posts)That said I don't think age is an issue here for the same reason 55+ housing communities are legal. Age is protected for employment.
Demsrule86
(68,632 posts)and businesses do not hire under 21.
Justice
(7,188 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The Age Discrimination Act applies to organizations receiving federal (sometimes state) funds only.
So yes, if a private business decided to serve thirty-one year old customers only and no one else, it would be wholly legal unless the business was receiving a federal grant or loan.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)Most business would lose their liquor license if they sold alcohol to an underage person.
forthemiddle
(1,381 posts)But only for those over 21.
If the legislatures passed a law that upped the legal age, that would be no problem, but as of now its a legal product for those 18 and over.
procon
(15,805 posts)Apartments for seniors only, restaurants have a separate kid friendly section, or price discounts only for seniors. There various competitive local sports leagues that are divided by age. Movie theaters and other entertainment venues, exercise facilities, dining, retail stores have special times and discounts for seniors.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,085 posts)Driving/car rental/car ownership is legal at age 16 in most states. But most car rental agencies will not rent to anyone under 25.
Age is not a protected class, with the limited exception of over age 40 for employment purposes.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Someone up thread said age discrimination of this kind might not be a protected class.
I have mixed thoughts, since voting at 18 made sense if they could be drafted at that age. So really this is the same. And there are mass shooters over 21. It's the guns, not the age.
onenote
(42,733 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Discrimination by age is perfectly fine in many contexts. Employment is a notable exception.
Renew Deal
(81,868 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)young gunners whine like babies because they can't purchase the latest lethal weapons.
Demsrule86
(68,632 posts)It is a good move and to stop selling AR 15s as well.
I've worked at a store that sold age restricted products before (cigarettes). WHen you scan the barcode on a pack of Marlboros, the POS system prompts you to enter the customer's birth date (which could be faked for someone you know is of age-- we would do 1/11/11 but now that is the birthdate of a 7yo-- in 1998 it was not).
FSogol
(45,513 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)FSogol
(45,513 posts)Demsrule86
(68,632 posts)that some even on DU are so obviously for guns no matter how many kids die. Guns must be regulated and it not unconstitutional to do so...even Sacalia agree with this.
Ms. Toad
(34,085 posts)Certain civil rights laws prohibit private entities from discriminating against limited protected classes in employment, housing, education, and public accommodations. As to age, the protections are very limited - essentially a one-way prohibition on employment discrimination against people age 40 or over (i.e. someone over 40 is protected; someone under 40 is not)
Otherwise, you're free to discriminate against anyone you choose.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)I expect this policy wont be legal in some states.
Ms. Toad
(34,085 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Ive already found two, CA and MI, where it wouldnt be legal.
Looks like Virginia has age listed as well.
I am slowly going State by state and finding more and more states where age is listed without qualification.
Ms. Toad
(34,085 posts)Michigan's employment discrimination law, for example, lists age as a protected class, but employment laws only apply to employment discrimination - not to public accommodations/sales.
ETA: I've now found the general non-discrimination law for Michigan ( https://www.michigan.gov/documents/act_453_elliott_larsen_8772_7.pdf) , that was used to force car rental companies to rent to anyone 18 or over. Guns would appear to follow the same principles. (Although the case doesn't explain why discrimination would apparently be permitted between age 16 and 18 as to car rentals.)
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Specifically Article 3 37.2392 sec 302. I would copy and paste it by my phone is acting funny and not letting me.
To see it similarly applied look at the fact that the state sued car rental companies under that statue and now you can rent a car at 18 in Michigan- see Bickham v. Hertz.
Ms. Toad
(34,085 posts)Response to B2G (Reply #22)
Ms. Toad This message was self-deleted by its author.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The movie rating system is an entirely voluntary system.
It was instituted precisely to avoid the alternative of legislating what persons of a certain age would be permitted to see or not see.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)And allows them to go to those movies under those ages with parental consent.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)sarisataka
(18,733 posts)with a legal product that has age restrictions.
Could a liquor store decide it will not sell to anyone under the age of 25?
hlthe2b
(102,328 posts)hlthe2b
(102,328 posts)Just like stores can restrict special sales to their regular customers or Apple can restrict first sales of a new iphone to, say, previous customers, those who pay cash... or whatever they want to do.
MarvinGardens
(779 posts)E.g. chemical suppliers (in the U.S. at least) will not sell to just anyone with the money. They want to know who you are and what you intend to do with their products, though this is not a legal requirement for many chemicals. Some retailers will not sell cough medicine (dextromethorphan) to underage kids although this is not a legal requirement.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,027 posts)dsc
(52,166 posts)only for the old. They can easily to this. Just like a store or eatery can ban children.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)blake2012
(1,294 posts)If its not discriminating against a protected class.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Under federal law you are correct. Under many states anti-discrimination laws they may not be able to.
Response to Lee-Lee (Reply #49)
onenote This message was self-deleted by its author.
OldHippieChick
(2,434 posts)children can buy their weapons of mass destruction at other retail outlets. It's not as if they were being deprived of their right to kill.
Kingofalldems
(38,468 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)I've already stated that multiple times.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Youth is not a protected class under Federal law, so any lawsuit there wont go anywhere.
Now state and local laws may in some places come into play. Some have shown the example of car rentals, but state laws affect that as well.
An example is Michigan, where the state sued car rental companies for age discrimination for not renting to younger people because the states anti-discrimination law just says age cant be discriminated on in any way. So at 18 in Michigan you can rent a car because the law protects your right.
You will also find that in many states car companies have specific exemptions under the law allowing them to set age limits.
California is one example. If you look at the Unruh Civil Rights act is says:
"All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, or sexual orientation are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever.
Under this law no, they couldnt refuse to sell a product legal for the person to buy based on age.
And yes, in CA auto rental companies have a special exemption codified in law for their policies. So as it looks right now if a 19 year old who is a legal buyer in CA gets turned away right now they would have a strong discrimination case under CA law.
spanone
(135,857 posts)roamer65
(36,747 posts)removal of assault weapons from their shelves permanently. That cannot be challenged and now no one can get one from their stores, regardless of age.