General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLevi Sanders criticized removal of Confederate flag from VA license plate after Charlottesville.
Last edited Wed Feb 28, 2018, 04:15 AM - Edit history (1)
Link to tweet
?s=21
struggle4progress
(118,320 posts)I don't see why it has to be on the license plate
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)And you are right.
That is not Levi Sanders' real Twitter account.
Check this one. I Googled, and it was hard to find, but this is his real Twitter account.
https://twitter.com/Celentra?lang=en
I hope this was just a mistake by the author of the OP.
If it is intentional, it is a horrible thing to do, to lie about a candidate in this way.
I hope it is just a mistake.
https://twitter.com/Celentra?lang=en
RandySF
(59,079 posts)yardwork
(61,690 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Op seems to be standing behind it. Sounds like something Levi would say. Its consistent with their past history.
You seem to be knowingly linking to the same account.
If you are wrong, you seem to agree that Levi is shit. 👍🏼 Hard for many of us to believe these are his words as well. He seems to have gotten bit by the economic anxiety bug.
struggle4progress
(118,320 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a18754769/levi-sanders-bernie-sanders-son-congress/
Esquire has photoshopped pictures of his tweets.
WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)is he in congress? or just running? He's horrible.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)Is he running on our platform? Or just trying to split the vote?
onenote
(42,736 posts)Care to apologize, respond, delete your posts. Or are you leaving them there so we know who you are?
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)you can be quite predictable.
Cha
(297,471 posts)for Progress didn't say..
And you are right.
That is not Levi Sanders' real Twitter account.
You're the one who's made "the mistake".. and you should own up to it.
It's Bernie Sanders' son, Levi Sanders', Twitter Account and he makes really dumb, un-Democratic, statements.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)still_one
(92,321 posts)Wwcd
(6,288 posts)Any questions as to where this has its origins & $upport?
KOCH'S fund not only the Libertarian Party, but the Tea Party .
The Party started by their father in the 50's/60's, The John Birch Society, was so anti-American (they despised free societies & the Kennedys) that the US Gov't pretty much drove them underground. By today's standards they would be listed with SPLC for their anti-American stance.
They re-emerged not as The JBS but under their new name. The Libertarian Party. They changed up their message but their mission remains the same.
The destruction of democracy, of a free society.
THAT is who hides in the shadows and appears as psudo Democrats when the Party needs an usurper to keep its power crushed.
Libertarian & Tea Party are the KOCH's updated John Birch Society.
Watch any 3rd Party that shifts from Democrat in name, to anti-democrat in word.
I will bet the farm on their being money & strings attatched by the Kochs.
This is who they are & how they finally achieve their father's goal of destroying democracy, & replacing it with his beloved John Birch Society.
Who were the ONLY 2 Senators to vote against Magnitsky again?
Right.
still_one
(92,321 posts)Wwcd
(6,288 posts)still_one
(92,321 posts)Koch connection with them
Cha
(297,471 posts)to RF.
still_one
(92,321 posts)Cha
(297,471 posts)started out as a Dem, too.
still_one
NanceGreggs
(27,816 posts)... the douche doesn't fall from the bag.
And if that observation gets me a "hide", it's well worth it.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)so pointedly showing us. Diminish the Democratic name and divide the party. Fecking asshole.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)The one linked to in the OP belongs to someone else I think.
Check this out.
https://twitter.com/Celentra?lang=en
It's disgusting to see a lie spread like this about any candidate.
brush
(53,815 posts)link you're posting.
Aren't you disgusted that all this divisive crap is always around these people?
Who are we supposed to believe, them or our lying eyes?
yardwork
(61,690 posts)You've already said that you don't understand Twitter.
It's been explained to you several times. I'll attempt to help you understand. Levi Sanders' tweets are being retweeted by others. He's running as a candidate and people believe that voters have the right to know what he's been saying about Trump (Sanders is a fan), the NRA (Sanders loves them), Obama (Sanders thinks he was weak against the Russians), Planned Parenthood (Sanders is against them), etc.
I appreciate being informed so that I can support the people running against Sanders. I wouldn't want him to be elected.
BannonsLiver
(16,434 posts)Youre not fooling anyone.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I think you need to revisit what you define as "disgusting."
You're welcome.
kcr
(15,318 posts)And also unintentionally hilarious.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)I have no particular interest in his campaign, but I don't like spreading lies.
https://twitter.com/Celentra?lang=en
Check it out. He really is a liberal.
Everyone can vote for whomever they wish, but it is mean and low to spread a lie about what is someone's Twitter account.
https://twitter.com/Celentra?lang=en
Really beneath DU in my opinion.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)Here is the url of the tweet in the OP. If you look very very closely, you'll see that it is a tweet from the account you referenced.
In order to go to the link shown below, remove the space between 'https' and '://'. I added it so the link itself would show up in this post.
https ://twitter.com/Celentra/status/897572989679652865
You owe the OP an apology for calling him dishonest.
BTW, the original tweet in the OP was from a person who was retweeting the Sanders 'celentra' account tweet. It showed both tweets because that's how twitter works in those cases. People post retweets here all the time that look just like the original one here.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,113 posts)Response to Sophia4 (Reply #9)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cha
(297,471 posts)misinformation.
You owe everyone an apology for accusing them of being "mean and low", when it is you who is Not Getting IT.
pandr32
(11,601 posts)Agreed
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)dalton99a
(81,565 posts)It is disgusting.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)No doubt this has been (will be) alerted on. I wish you luck!
WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,113 posts)NBachers
(17,133 posts)Mark S. Mackenzie - State Rep.[10]
Deaglan McEachern[11]
Mindi Messmer - State Rep.[12]
Terence O'Rourke[13]
Chris Pappas[14]
Levi Sanders[15]
Lincoln Soldati[16]
Maura Sullivan
In my quick review, I've been most impressed with, in this order: Maura Sullivan, Mark S. Mackenzie, Terence O'Rourke, and Mindi Messmer. If I had to narrow it down at this point, I'd probably make it Maura and Mark, with Maura getting my contributions.
There's plenty of information at the link. Let's talk about who else is running, and see who to focus on.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)Here is Levi Sanders' account.
https://twitter.com/Celentra?lang=en
I Googled for it. It was not easy to find, but I think the one I link to is the authentic one.
NBachers
(17,133 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)The OP is dishonest.
That account does not have anything to do with Levi Sanders' account.
Here is Levi Sanders' account.
https://twitter.com/Celentra?lang=en
RandySF
(59,079 posts)Link to tweet
?s=21
OnDoutside
(19,965 posts)posts.
I followed the twitter link YOU provided, and found the same tweet posted by Sanders
Link to tweet
Response to Sophia4 (Reply #6)
SidDithers This message was self-deleted by its author.
Demsrule86
(68,632 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)....that you are wrong on this?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,113 posts)RandySF
(59,079 posts)oasis
(49,396 posts)manage to get in, they'd be a pain in the ass for our leadership to deal with.
Demsrule86
(68,632 posts)think. To defend removing the confederate flag...a symbol of slavery and treason...well let's just say...it would be an easy choice not to vote for him in the New Hampshire primary. And those who condemned McAuliffe (who was a very good governor) as being too centrist and who seems to the left of Levi Sanders are panting with excitement that a new politician named Sanders is running. It seems almost a fan club. What would this candidate have to offer were his name not Sanders? Those who defend his remarks on the confederate flag would rightfully condemn another politician if he said the same thing (rightfully). The only reason I can see why some would support him after reading through his twitter is that his name is Sanders...not a good enough reason.
He combined the tweet below with the words used in a toast Feinstein made about Hillary's candidacy at her birthday party to the effect that if she couldn't couldn't win the presidency, what woman could? Nice Mr. Sanders...so no woman can win in your opinion? I guess Hillary got what she deserved why that uppity woman who received three million more votes in the general than Trump (who's voters we need to understand) and probably had the election stolen from her should not have run...a mere woman after all (sarcasm). No more 'wimmin folks' running for the presidency or even higher office...lets leave it to the men (sarcasm). As a woman, I am offended.
matter.
Link to tweet
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Including me.
Demsrule86
(68,632 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,434 posts)dalton99a
(81,565 posts)Docreed2003
(16,869 posts)WTF does a dude from New England give a crap about the confederate flag?? As an aside, its freaking hilarious to me that the folks at that Richmond newspaper dont even know their own history. That battle flag aint the stars and bars, even though its called that all the time. The stars and bars refers to the first flag of the confederacy which looks nothing like the battle flags of the Armies of VA and TN.
Also, again, why is this dude running as a Democrat??
WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)and he's following in daddy's footsteps, only younger and with more vigor.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)uponit7771
(90,348 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Not really not funny
Well the Levi part, yes , it's no for real
Who the hell raised that kid?