Why Stop At AR-15's. What about RPG's, Grenade Launchers, Anti Tank Rockets etc etc.

[TheMastersNemesis]

The truth is that that NRA believes civilians should have anything.

[ck4829]

1. When the second amendment was written, they were talking about single shot muskets

What if I want a tank and Wolverine's claws, does the NRA support that?

[TheMastersNemesis]

2. I Wonder. Perhaps Not. But You Never Know Following Their Present Logic.

[oneshooter]

10. If you want a tank, then all you need is $

A LOT of $.

http://www.milweb.net/classifieds.php?type=1

[NCTraveler]

3. Why stop at AR-15's.

What about guns?

We have a gun problem. Not an AR-15 problem. Not and AK problem. Not a RPG problem. We have a gun problem.

[TheMastersNemesis]

5. True Enough But They Want More And More Varied Guns And Who Knows What Else.

[NCTraveler]

7. The "varied" part is insignificant.

The problem we have is with guns.

[Sophia4]

4. Precisely. If it can be manufactured, hauled into a store or depicted in a catalogue,

why not sell it?

Who cares what happens with it after it is sold and the check that pays for it is cashed and safely stashed in the bank account of the manufacturer?

sarcasm

[lame54]

6. Who's talking about stopping...

Just don't ask for too much up front

[bluestarone]

8. i've thought that way too!

God forbid! (Right To Bare Arms) What does this mean? They only had Muskets at that time! They had no idea of what weapons were possible! It all comes down to the definition of those 4 words? Or does it?

[hack89]

9. America drew that line in 1934 with the National Firearms Act (NFA)

which no one is talking about revising.